[D'rek]

Dolmen 2.0, on 04 February 2018 - 03:02 PM, said:

Ok since all three are keen I'd like to hear from the 4 other players which candidate they prefer. I'll nominate that player.

Sounds like you're trying to expressly avoid stating an opinion yourself...

I'm pro-Messremb because:

Messremb, on 03 February 2018 - 06:35 PM, said:

I want to be chancellor because I'm nowhere near as scheming and devious as Venge or as much of as unknown game-wise as Nevyn.

So far, I agree^^

[Itwæs Nom]

I think that someone with knowledge of this game is more of a threat as a fascicst than an asset as a liberal so I'd prefer someone else but Nevyn as a chancellor

[Tattersail_]

I don't want to be chancellor

[Nevyn]

Well, as I already said , I am personally not supporting any chancellor but me, but I am also noting people putting forth chancellors other than themselves with great suspicion

[Dolmen 2.0]

D, on 04 February 2018 - 05:18 PM, said:

Dolmen 2.0, on 04 February 2018 - 03:02 PM, said:

Ok since all three are keen I'd like to hear from the 4 other players which candidate they prefer. I'll nominate that player.

Sounds like you're trying to expressly avoid stating an opinion yourself...

Yep!

I dont want my opinion to affect everyones feedback. Also i dont want to look like im pushing for any particular one of the three. I will put forth whomever seems to have the most positive support as this gives me a chance to actually be president and work with someone most players feel less uncomfortable with in the second seat.

I think so far we’re looking at Messremb for chancelor since D’rek is the only one openly supporting an option and Nom is apparently for either Mess or Venge. Tatts is keeping mum choicewise, which is a choice aswell I guess.

It leaves us to hear from Cause.

[Nevyn]

You're term limited, Mr President. Hurry it up.

[Dolmen 2.0]

Uh ok so anyone else not interested in a wait?

I had the impression we had time.

[Nevyn]

After a few policies getting opinions and taking time makes sense. Doing it when most of the players have no info ... We could be playing for awhile.

Plus, not for nothing but looking too much like you don't want to be responsible for your chancellor choice is suspicious.

This post has been edited by Nevyn: 05 February 2018 - 01:11 AM

[Dolmen 2.0]

Nevyn, on 05 February 2018 - 01:10 AM, said:

After a few policies getting opinions and taking time makes sense. Doing it when most of the players have no info ... We could be playing for awhile.

Plus, not for nothing but looking too much like you don't want to be responsible for your chancellor choice is suspicious.

Yeah I can see that.

This is all a learning experience for most of us and in my mind the popular view is more likely than not to be the liberal view especially early in the game when liberals are comfortable in our majority.

If that comes off as suspicious I dont see how thats avoidable.

[Itwæs Nom]

Dolmen 2.0, on 05 February 2018 - 03:55 AM, said:

Nevyn, on 05 February 2018 - 01:10 AM, said:

After a few policies getting opinions and taking time makes sense. Doing it when most of the players have no info ... We could be playing for awhile.

Plus, not for nothing but looking too much like you don't want to be responsible for your chancellor choice is suspicious.

Yeah I can see that.

This is all a learning experience for most of us and in my mind the popular view is more likely than not to be the liberal view especially early in the game when liberals are comfortable in our majority.

If that comes off as suspicious I dont see how thats avoidable.

Those who you're asking an opinion of have fascists among them while about yourself you know you're liberal and you're not gonna intentionally pick a chancellor that will hurt the town. Same goes for Tatts.

[Cause]

ironically Drek is now the best candidate for chancellor no? She cant be president again for 6 turns and otherwise we have no information that I can see yo make any rational decisisons as yet

[Tattersail_]

I prefer Messremb, reading up.

[Tattersail_]

When a Government gets approved, do the President and Chancellor have off thread comms to discuss policies?

[Itwæs Nom]

Haha

I won an IT (more like simple logic) competition in this region for our school last week

Principal just came to my class to congratulate me

And gave me a new front bumper from some Volvo as a prize

It even has a functional camera in it

[Itwæs Nom]

Also I cracked the rear bumper on my golf on saturday by drifting into a wall of snow that was frozen solid, wish he gave me a fitting one

[Itwæs Nom]

Cause, on 05 February 2018 - 08:05 AM, said:

ironically Drek is now the best candidate for chancellor no? She cant be president again for 6 turns and otherwise we have no information that I can see yo make any rational decisisons as yet

This makes sense

Guess I'd prefer D'rek then

[Itwæs Nom]

Tattersail_, on 05 February 2018 - 08:46 AM, said:

When a Government gets approved, do the President and Chancellor have off thread comms to discuss policies?

Don't think so because it would be inconvenient when playing irl

[Tattersail_]

Itwæs Nom, on 05 February 2018 - 09:14 AM, said:

Tattersail_, on 05 February 2018 - 08:46 AM, said:

When a Government gets approved, do the President and Chancellor have off thread comms to discuss policies?

Don't think so because it would be inconvenient when playing irl

So they discuss them on thread?

[Itwæs Nom]

Tattersail_, on 05 February 2018 - 09:35 AM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 05 February 2018 - 09:14 AM, said:

Tattersail_, on 05 February 2018 - 08:46 AM, said:

When a Government gets approved, do the President and Chancellor have off thread comms to discuss policies?

Don't think so because it would be inconvenient when playing irl

So they discuss them on thread?

According to rules any communication between them is forbidden

[Itwæs Nom]

.

Attached File(s)

•  Screenshot_20180205-105258.png (611.12K)
  Number of downloads: 0