Malaese, on May 14 2009, 08:00 PM, said:
Gem Windcaster, on May 14 2009, 11:17 AM, said:
On the topic of playing RI: people think I hate playing RI, but it's not that, it's just that I feel I am lousy at it, and that I think it's hard to do. Generally it depends on the game what kind of play I make of it. I take playing RI very seriously, that's why I sometimes explode - I think it's the same with Venge. We both take the role very seriously, so we get very frustrated when faced with ridiculous (we think) accusations and such. I think the average RI player that generally play sheep and do nothing on their own is a worse RI player - if you at least invest something in the role, you have more to loose.
Gem I don't want to attack you but I want to note what you say is part of the problem. It's not worse actually, it's another style and has it's benefits. If I could only tell a new player 1 thing about RI it'd be,
have fun and don't steal focus. The most powerful mechanic in the game is your brain not some power you are given. So it's perfectly reasonable that an RI player would want to get to the end game to try and figure it out. It's also part of the sentiment that RI is just cannon fodder and there is a certain logic to that strategy, but the flip-side is you can't wonder why people get frustrated drawing the role.
I think there is too much finger pointing going on in the game and in the SH speculation outside of the game about good and bad gameplay people are really uptight about it and stuck into that "my way is best" mindset. Just as an example, I don't think Pb is playing his best game, but he's not playing the game wrong by any stretch, but some of the comments in here are going to be harsh for him to read afterwards I think. No different than people getting salty in the game thread about what someone is doing. You may not like it, but fuck me it almost worked with Gamelon and drumstick. You can't argue that!
There are pros and cons to both the drawing NKs and the playing for endgame strategies as RI. As I said before, I prefer to do the latter, but you can't have everyone do that, because otherwise the game falls apart. You need to get the grain of sand for the pearl to grow around from somewhere

.
Regarding PB's play, I don't think his general strategy is wrong, per se, but that method only really works if you can distinguish between slips made by innocents who have been riled up and actual scum slips. There are always going to be far more of the former than the latter, because first of all there are more innos, and secondly the scum are more likely to be careful. It seemed to me like PB seized on the first thing that came up, which to be honest wasn't much of anything at all. He would have been better off finding a few slips before pushing hard for a lynch on the most suspicious one. Also, if you're going to be aggressive and try and catch scum out, then you need to spread your nets a lot wider than PB did - you've got to target several players as opposed to just one, and draw reactions from the people who don't want to give them. The scum like more than watching the innos harass each other, so they're not going to intervene if they can help it. That means you need to control your aggression and stop things from getting out of hand, and switch targets early and often. There is a fine line between being aggressive and being distracting to your teammates, after all, and if you stay in one place you're going to end up squarely on the wrong side of it. That is what I feel happened to PB here, and hopefully he'll take some of that onboard for next time

.
Sir Thursday
This post has been edited by Sir Thursday: 14 May 2009 - 07:21 PM
Don't look now, but I think there's something weird attached to the bottom of my posts.