Cause, on 12 March 2026 - 06:16 PM, said:
The economics in these scenarios tend to be unpredictable and can be very counter-intuitive.
For example, sanctions put on short-term pressure but when you look at economies that have been heavily sanctioned for a long time - like Iran - in some ways that's insulating.
War economies are famously capable of churning on by creating their own jobs and demand, at least while it's necessary for war, and domestic rebuilding projects are in some ways comparable to growth.
Not saying Iran's economy is in a great shape or something, not remotely, more that I don't think we should expect economics to end the war in any near-term timeframe. Or if anything I think it's more likely America that will blink first economically.
The American economy has far further to fall and isn't starting from a strong position to handle short-term shocks due to previous waves of inflation, jobs disruption, and record debt levels. Republicans are not popular, Israel is not popular, and launching an aggressive war in the middle east is not popular. Even the American media sounds noticeably more critical about this war which typically signals a divided elite establishment.
I won't be surprised if that high gas prices force America to back off before Iran's economic woes force a regime change.
Meanwhile, Democratic senators claim that US military leadership are briefing that their war goals do not to extend regime change or to incapaciting Iran's nuclear programme.

Help

















