[D'rek]

twelve, on 01 November 2019 - 04:22 PM, said:

To compensate you I will wash your current commodities and I'll refresh them again and trade with you when I pop trade. There is also the possibility you will also gain some tech.

Alright, that works, thanks.

[Tattersail_]

twelve, on 01 November 2019 - 04:22 PM, said:

D, on 01 November 2019 - 03:28 PM, said:

twelve, on 01 November 2019 - 03:24 PM, said:

D, on 01 November 2019 - 03:18 PM, said:

twelve, on 01 November 2019 - 03:01 PM, said:

D, on 01 November 2019 - 02:27 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 01 November 2019 - 02:27 PM, said:

D, on 01 November 2019 - 02:20 PM, said:

So Tatts, we're being nice now, ya? I don't AC you and you won't AC me?

Yes, if you would like to exchange ceasefire then that would be cool!

Sure

So D'rek when are you planning on moving units out of Nevant? Or using Leadership?

I am mulling over a few different plans at the moment. There's a lot of appeal to stalling as long as possible.

Well I cant stall much and with Tatts ignoring my offer to pay to use the action card on anyone else I think I have to move in before I have much fewer infantry to replace the many I've lost and will lose.

So basically, you told me to move to Nevant and leave you Silvano as part of our previous deal... then when you cancel the deal you won't even let me use Nevant before attacking it? You realize that moving there and then moving back isn't free for me?

To be fair the board canceled the deal when they killed my troops. Now with Tatts threatening my troops again and with our history I have to play knowing he will. I cant wait. My game is already on a knife's edge.

To compensate you I will wash your current commodities and I'll refresh them again and trade with you when I pop trade. There is also the possibility you will also gain some tech.

If you really dont want to lose your troops then help convince Tatts to use his action card on someone else other than you or me then I'll wait until you can pull out.

To be fait Twelve you are not the only one on 3 VP any more and your hold on Rex is not as strong. So my mind is not set if D'rek has other plans.

D'rek what are your thoughts as to where the action card should be played, what would help you the most? Like I said, I have no problems freeing up that planet of infantry.

[D'rek]

Tattersail_, on 01 November 2019 - 04:32 PM, said:

To be fait Twelve you are not the only one on 3 VP any more and your hold on Rex is not as strong. So my mind is not set if D'rek has other plans.

D'rek what are your thoughts as to where the action card should be played, what would help you the most? Like I said, I have no problems freeing up that planet of infantry.

ACs were made to be used, and since it can only be played on a hazardous planet there's not a ton of good targets. No point in using it on a remote planet with only 1 infantry on it. You could do Meer, but it's not like Nom is especially winning or threatening, and frankly it's always a good idea not to put the Xxcha on your bad side for nothing. You cold do Tequ'ran if you're worried about Toaster being in a very good position, which he is, albeit I did just AC him so it might be a bit mean to do it a second time right away. If you have designs on skirmishing with the L1z1x, Lodd Eru is a very good target at the moment, but otherwise why upset a neighbour.

All of those might move around before your next turn, though.

Arborec is of course the most impactful target, since their infantry mean so much more to them than the rest of us. Sounds like Twelve is going to move into Nevant before your turn anyways, so I guess wait and see how many infantry end up on which of those two planets?

[Imperial Historian]

Blend the latest map still doesn't show the correct number of cruisers and destroyers for me or the correct positions.

I should have a destroyer in vefut, - 1 destroyer +1 cruiser in arnor lor, and - 2 cruisers and high alert token, +1 destroyer in my home system.

[ToasTer86]

@d'rek / Nekro , what the hell. Why are you targetting my planets .......

This will not be forgotten . @ sardakk if you need anything with the war vs Nekro let me know !!

This post has been edited by ToasTer86: 01 November 2019 - 05:45 PM

[D'rek]

ToasTer86, on 01 November 2019 - 05:44 PM, said:

@d'rek / Nekro , what the hell. Why are you targetting my planets .......

This will not be forgotten . @ sardakk if you need anything with the war vs Nekro let me know !!

Let's see, you have 3VP, 4 tech, nine planets, 6 ACs, already drew a new SO... not to mention as Naalu you have an added edge in claiming victory first. Out of everyone, you're the obvious choice.

[Galactic Council]

Imperial Historian, on 01 November 2019 - 05:32 PM, said:

Blend the latest map still doesn't show the correct number of cruisers and destroyers for me or the correct positions.

I should have a destroyer in vefut, - 1 destroyer +1 cruiser in arnor lor, and - 2 cruisers and high alert token, +1 destroyer in my home system.

Sorry, this is the first time I've noticed that you've said something about this, I think. Always best to send me map update issues via your game PM, I am less likely to miss them as sometimes I only skim through the thread depending on how busy I am.

[Galactic Council]

Galactic Council, on 01 November 2019 - 06:26 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 01 November 2019 - 05:32 PM, said:

Blend the latest map still doesn't show the correct number of cruisers and destroyers for me or the correct positions.

I should have a destroyer in vefut, - 1 destroyer +1 cruiser in arnor lor, and - 2 cruisers and high alert token, +1 destroyer in my home system.

Sorry, this is the first time I've noticed that you've said something about this, I think. Always best to send me map update issues via your game PM, I am less likely to miss them as sometimes I only skim through the thread depending on how busy I am.

Are you sure the Destroyer should be in your home system? I seem to remember moving it from Vefut II.

[Itwæs Nom]

Khellendros, on 01 November 2019 - 04:10 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 01 November 2019 - 03:34 PM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 01 November 2019 - 02:44 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 01 November 2019 - 09:02 AM, said:

Morgoth, on 31 October 2019 - 09:32 AM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 31 October 2019 - 08:43 AM, said:

Khellendros, on 31 October 2019 - 08:34 AM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 31 October 2019 - 08:30 AM, said:

Sure

That being said, ghosts, even letnev I'm open to passing the token further up under the usual circumstances for a small fee or favor, although then I would also ask for the second pick for Naalu in their name

Sure, I'm open to this. What kind of small fee or favour would you like?

Promise of a free refresh from both of you would do it

That is an acceptable deal. I'm happy to follow through.

Nom if you are passing up to letnev would you mind passing up one further?

The reason I offered it to the two of them this cheaply was to move the next round politics pick as close to me as possible and the chances are already high enough that someone anticlockwise from me will pick politics so no I wouldn't mind but I'd ask for an additional tg

And since you already owe me a refresh the alternative I had in mind for either of them in case they owed me a refresh was 3 votes for me on an agenda of my choice, so all in all 3 votes and a tg whenever we connect

When are you planning on playing politics? And i just have to leave you your first pick? If so we have a deal

I don’t think that’s what he said?

Me neither?

(tg, 3 votes and firstpick)

And the politics play will mostly depend on when leadership is played I think

@Naalu awaiting the results of your negotiations with the warriors and prophets and your answer to taking/not taking Mansa and letting me borrow the hazardous planet

[Itwæs Nom]

@towhomitmayconcern

I intend to be moving to the other side of alpha wormhole and if the destination is blocked by forces that I have chances of overcoming I will take those chances

[Khellendros]

D'rek, any chance of you playing Leadership in the next two turns? I can see how you'd be tempted to stall.

[ToasTer86]

Imperial Historian, on 01 November 2019 - 03:32 PM, said:

ToasTer86, on 01 November 2019 - 11:58 AM, said:

@Khellendros, @IH

Would you mind if I land on Piscium for 1 turn, I dont care about the carrier that I will lose I just need the 4 types for 1 round ?

Is that the 3 planet system? I think there will be a few people aiming for that system to get the 4 planet vp.

I think Morgoth wants one of the planets there as well. Is there a kind of deal we can make here ?
I think Morgoth is even waiting with his turn till we figure this out

[Imperial Historian]

Galactic Council, on 01 November 2019 - 09:59 PM, said:

Galactic Council, on 01 November 2019 - 06:26 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 01 November 2019 - 05:32 PM, said:

Blend the latest map still doesn't show the correct number of cruisers and destroyers for me or the correct positions.

I should have a destroyer in vefut, - 1 destroyer +1 cruiser in arnor lor, and - 2 cruisers and high alert token, +1 destroyer in my home system.

Sorry, this is the first time I've noticed that you've said something about this, I think. Always best to send me map update issues via your game PM, I am less likely to miss them as sometimes I only skim through the thread depending on how busy I am.

Are you sure the Destroyer should be in your home system? I seem to remember moving it from Vefut II.

Galactic Council, on 25 October 2019 - 12:53 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 25 October 2019 - 06:20 AM, said:

Realised I'd mixed up destroyer and cruiser in my move and build actions, switched it to the right way round.

I will have to revise the map tonight, then, because I just assumed you meant to move the destroyer you already had on the map on Vefut II rather than a cruiser from your home system. Will update tonight!

I built a destroyer in my home system not a cruiser (i couldn't afford the cruiser) and then moved a cruiser from it.

You moved the destroyer from vefut instead.

I sent you a PM as well with the same info

[Imperial Historian]

Itwæs Nom, on 01 November 2019 - 10:12 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 01 November 2019 - 04:10 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 01 November 2019 - 03:34 PM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 01 November 2019 - 02:44 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 01 November 2019 - 09:02 AM, said:

Morgoth, on 31 October 2019 - 09:32 AM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 31 October 2019 - 08:43 AM, said:

Khellendros, on 31 October 2019 - 08:34 AM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 31 October 2019 - 08:30 AM, said:

Sure

That being said, ghosts, even letnev I'm open to passing the token further up under the usual circumstances for a small fee or favor, although then I would also ask for the second pick for Naalu in their name

Sure, I'm open to this. What kind of small fee or favour would you like?

Promise of a free refresh from both of you would do it

That is an acceptable deal. I'm happy to follow through.

Nom if you are passing up to letnev would you mind passing up one further?

The reason I offered it to the two of them this cheaply was to move the next round politics pick as close to me as possible and the chances are already high enough that someone anticlockwise from me will pick politics so no I wouldn't mind but I'd ask for an additional tg

And since you already owe me a refresh the alternative I had in mind for either of them in case they owed me a refresh was 3 votes for me on an agenda of my choice, so all in all 3 votes and a tg whenever we connect

When are you planning on playing politics? And i just have to leave you your first pick? If so we have a deal

I don’t think that’s what he said?

Me neither?

(tg, 3 votes and firstpick)

And the politics play will mostly depend on when leadership is played I think

@Naalu awaiting the results of your negotiations with the warriors and prophets and your answer to taking/not taking Mansa and letting me borrow the hazardous planet

Yeah i was just clarifying you only wanted me to leave you first pick, ie i get second. So sure tg in the agenda phase or when we neighbour and 3 votes on one agenda that doesn't directly harm me, and I'll leave you first pick.

[Imperial Historian]

ToasTer86, on 02 November 2019 - 08:43 AM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 01 November 2019 - 03:32 PM, said:

ToasTer86, on 01 November 2019 - 11:58 AM, said:

@Khellendros, @IH

Would you mind if I land on Piscium for 1 turn, I dont care about the carrier that I will lose I just need the 4 types for 1 round ?

Is that the 3 planet system? I think there will be a few people aiming for that system to get the 4 planet vp.

I think Morgoth wants one of the planets there as well. Is there a kind of deal we can make here ?
I think Morgoth is even waiting with his turn till we figure this out

I have an interest in the 2 influence industrial planet, i am not bothered about the rest. I do have an interest in not letting anyone score the vp uncontested though. I'd hold off moving in that direction for a tg or 3 votes on an agenda of my choice .

[Imperial Historian]

Actually depends a bit on morgoth... Are you after tura nora?

[Khellendros]

Imperial Historian, on 02 November 2019 - 09:09 AM, said:

ToasTer86, on 02 November 2019 - 08:43 AM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 01 November 2019 - 03:32 PM, said:

ToasTer86, on 01 November 2019 - 11:58 AM, said:

@Khellendros, @IH

Would you mind if I land on Piscium for 1 turn, I dont care about the carrier that I will lose I just need the 4 types for 1 round ?

Is that the 3 planet system? I think there will be a few people aiming for that system to get the 4 planet vp.

I think Morgoth wants one of the planets there as well. Is there a kind of deal we can make here ?
I think Morgoth is even waiting with his turn till we figure this out

I have an interest in the 2 influence industrial planet, i am not bothered about the rest. I do have an interest in not letting anyone score the vp uncontested though. I'd hold off moving in that direction for a tg or 3 votes on an agenda of my choice .

I would also not contest it for 3 votes on an agenda of my choice.

[Imperial Historian]

Twelve, free refresh and commodity swap for your good neighbour?

Also are you still interested in buying access to vefut for a turn? If you want me to move my destroyer out need to know soon

[Itwæs Nom]

Imperial Historian, on 02 November 2019 - 09:08 AM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 01 November 2019 - 10:12 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 01 November 2019 - 04:10 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 01 November 2019 - 03:34 PM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 01 November 2019 - 02:44 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 01 November 2019 - 09:02 AM, said:

Morgoth, on 31 October 2019 - 09:32 AM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 31 October 2019 - 08:43 AM, said:

Khellendros, on 31 October 2019 - 08:34 AM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 31 October 2019 - 08:30 AM, said:

Sure

That being said, ghosts, even letnev I'm open to passing the token further up under the usual circumstances for a small fee or favor, although then I would also ask for the second pick for Naalu in their name

Sure, I'm open to this. What kind of small fee or favour would you like?

Promise of a free refresh from both of you would do it

That is an acceptable deal. I'm happy to follow through.

Nom if you are passing up to letnev would you mind passing up one further?

The reason I offered it to the two of them this cheaply was to move the next round politics pick as close to me as possible and the chances are already high enough that someone anticlockwise from me will pick politics so no I wouldn't mind but I'd ask for an additional tg

And since you already owe me a refresh the alternative I had in mind for either of them in case they owed me a refresh was 3 votes for me on an agenda of my choice, so all in all 3 votes and a tg whenever we connect

When are you planning on playing politics? And i just have to leave you your first pick? If so we have a deal

I don’t think that’s what he said?

Me neither?

(tg, 3 votes and firstpick)

And the politics play will mostly depend on when leadership is played I think

@Naalu awaiting the results of your negotiations with the warriors and prophets and your answer to taking/not taking Mansa and letting me borrow the hazardous planet

Yeah i was just clarifying you only wanted me to leave you first pick, ie i get second. So sure tg in the agenda phase or when we neighbour and 3 votes on one agenda that doesn't directly harm me, and I'll leave you first pick.

Aight deal then

[Tattersail_]

Twelve are playing trade first round? Any chance of a free refresh for promise of one in future from me?