Macros, on 20 May 2016 - 01:28 PM, said:
Pacing was pretty good, no parts of the novel really dragged for me, and I imagine it would have been quite easy to get sucked into a day by day of the retreat but it was contained nicely and only focused on the big days.
Again I can't stress this enough, its a good story, with good characters, decent pacing and a well realised world.
Man, my pacing went from "pretty good" to "decent" just in the course of the review!
Macros, on 20 May 2016 - 01:28 PM, said:
My only negative take on this section would be that it probably felt a little flat on the emotional scale as we had no connection with the fleeing refugees, and only a small cast of the Locians to engage with so yes people die, in significant numbers, it reminded of the death of one is a tragedy, the death of many is just a statistic.
There was however a good deal of involvement on some character deaths in the novel, I'll say no more on that for fear of spoilers. I thought some of it was very well handled.
So overall the story was engaging, for me, the world well realised, and clearly (going off Joel's maps) has a wealth of background and thought put into it. Pacing suited me fine, Id have been through the novel an awful lot quicker if I had of had the reading time available.
The build quality I'll praise again, this is a well made book, the tight margins don't bother me in the slightest. Were I to nit pick I wouldn't have minded the world map maybe broke in 2 so it was a little larger to pick out names. Took a bit of squinting to find Arc Dago etc.
Thanks! For the most part. I will admit, there's really only two or three scenes where the Locians or our Xyntoi friends engage directly with the refugees. It was a choice of tight pacing or deeper tragedy, and I opted to keep the story about the soldiers and royalty. Glad you enjoyed the weight of their personal stories.
The world map is clearly somewhat inadequate. Online is much better. It was too huge to fit in the softcover. There were plans to make it the entire interior (in colour!) after opening the cover for the Hard Cover release, but having lost the publisher I am now uncertain of a hard cover in the near future. So many references to other places on the map and the reader is left with a tease of the rest of the world. Again, a casualty of the publisher dying the week the book came out.
Macros, on 20 May 2016 - 01:28 PM, said:
Now, my problems with the times/ measurements stuff are mostly down to my personal preferences and little idiosyncrasies. Its a different world, based on different cultures, there will be different cycles and so forth. But the fact that you've made a minute 60 seconds long just pulls me out of immersion when I see the word tic and sixtieth. Bear with me on this, the first few times I saw tic I struggled massively to equate it to minutes, a tic has such common use in english speaking countries as slang for a second or a few moments that it was simply the wrong word for a minute for me, every time it would make me pause for a second to put it in place. Same with sixtieth, but this is more down to my brain acting silly. There's no need for a word for a second, heartbeats or moments works fine, seconds weren't really counted until the advent of reasonably accurate clocks, I don't think we even had a commonly agreed seconds duration until the 60s? Even well into the industrial revolution people worked in 15 minute intervals for timing as common watches weren't really up to marking minutes all that accurately. If its a different world with different rules then time demarcation would likely be totally different, we wouldn't have base 12 for hours (24 in a day is lunar phases I think) (egyptians?) 60 for minutes/seconds (babylonians and greeks?) and etc etc. So seeing these things that are clearly the same as real world timing with totally different names always grabs me, like I said, this is probably just personal to me, and wont be changed as you've set your worlds parameters in stone with the first novel completed and published. Decades makes sense as your numbering is the same and so a base ten is logical on that stand point (we'll not get into my own personal bugabear with the numbers 11 and 12, cause that's not relevant to anything ever)
I know you want to keep your world fantastical and fear delivering an info dumpnwould.ruin the magic so to speak, but I really think in you DP at the start, a quick breakdown of what your measurements roughly equate would.be a good thing. What is a run? A mile, a league, as far as a drunken donkey can stumble before tripping over its own nose?
This probably all reads as very petty, and I don't mean it to sound this way, these are thoughts (minus the donkey) that genuinely run in my head whenever these words crop up, and it does pull me from the immersion of a story, in many novels. I not saying MAKE IT ALL MILES AND LEAGUES AND MINUTES DAYS AND HOURS, far from it but I like to know from the get go what a measurement is in real world terms, so I can visualise a journey or description of something easier and more accurately to what the author intended. And tic just doesn't work as anything other than a tiny amount of time due to the nature of a ticking clock. Sorry.
Just one note on this: the list of time terminology I supplied you was a general comparison from my almanac to keep me on track. It is not exact in-world, per se. A tic is usually just a 'long moment' so to speak, around a minute but not mathematically equivalent. Likely less. Sixtieth was an addition based on the ambiguity of how long a tic really was. Maybe it did not help quite so much.
Macros, on 20 May 2016 - 01:28 PM, said:
Beyond my pedantry lies what I see as the only true issues in this novel.
The prose.
Now most of the prose flows reasonably well, but its a bit over indulgent in places, you have a penchant for using $10 words when a buck will do. A large and diverse vocabulary is all fair and well, and I pride myself on having a reasonably broad one but on occasion I found myself having to track back to gain context before deciding if I had read the word correctly and swing if it really fitted in what I thought was happening.
All authors have their own little 'things' (erikson loves bald pates and potsherds, eddings has a serious love for sly looks and grins, jordan is obsessed with a well turned calve and cleavage, granted I can understand the calves thing). I found myself thinking Joel's was a fear of overuse of some language, or a desire to use words he loves, and the misuse of decimated, but that's world wide now and is something I just have to live with. I love the word flibbertigibbet, I think its the best word in the dictionary, but I don't whip it out as regular people will just go, what the fuck does that mean? I just put myself in a higher class than regular, go me.
This problem for me was compounded because sometimes a word was simply out of place in a sentence or was the wrong word entirely for the situation. So when I caught one Id go back to see if I had read the sentance wrong and try and see if there was a contextual situation that made the word work better or maybe it had been a minor typo that changed things.
On that stuck in my head from early in the boom, I think from Katylos, someone took into a saclion and whacked their face off. You wrote 'diced their face', to me it should have been sliced, and dicing is something you do to food, make it into little dice shaped cubes. A single swipe from a blade slices.
This mightn't bother some people, but it was something again that pulled me from immersion and happened frequently enough that it did become a slight irritant.
It brought to mind Apts comment about the blurb, if these things caused me to jump back and reread sentences here and there to gain context or puzzle out if it was an error, it is bound to be an ask for someone whos first language isn't english. Im kind of curious to see if this was the case or if its all macros' crazy little brain overthinking things and making his own life difficult.
Im rambling.
Again I can't stress this enough, its a good story, with good characters, decent pacing and a well realised world. I want to know more. I did enjoy the journey, and will pick up Grip of Dust. I encourage other members to go forth and read, its a lot better than a lot of the stuff out there, I'd say its more.... Realistic (probably wrong word) and enjoyable for that than several very popular authors currently selling very well (I'll say no more because the fanbois might strike)
But, I felt like you needed a tighter editor on board to take it to that next level, or an extra few proof readers with highlighter marker pens, the prose could definitely do with a bit of streamlining here and and there and in some instances its simply the wrong word or grammatical structure used.
Not going to give a score overall because...
Xyn take you, I don't feel like it that's why
Macros, you've done me a wicked solid by giving it your undivided attention. Thank you kindly, sir. It was more than most will do (although you other folk reading it - how's it going? Catch up! Don't let him beat you to the punch
).
If you've read my previous thread about publication, or followed Maark's cutting of ties with our former pub, then you will know the conditions under which the novel was produced were far from ideal. It pains me greatly, because most everything you like comes down to JOEL while most everything you didn't like comes down to EDIT THAT SHIT. Makes me proud the content works as it is supposed to, but scared the conditions of publication will haunt me.
Aneom rest his hand on you.
This post has been edited by Tatterdemalion: 21 May 2016 - 03:42 AM