Tapper, on 31 May 2016 - 12:17 PM, said:
Abyss, on 31 May 2016 - 10:18 AM, said:
... But with Brienne on the way and Sansa in need of allies who aren't Littlefinger, I wonder whether they may not go a different way altogether. We know how the book sequence goes, but that may be a tangent the show doesn't need or want.
True - but if the Blackfish joins Sansa, then he needs to break the siege, get out of the castle with some soldiers and then get past Moat Cailin (sp), where Littlefinger and Bronze Yohn (a good punk band name?) are now sitting. If Littlefinger's '...The Vale joins the fray' meant 'The Vale joins the Frey' this is really Bad News for the Blackfish (which is a much better punk band name).
It's unlikely that they would have the Vale join the fray at all if they weren't going to join the Freys and complicate things. Again, this is a very good time indeed to introduce Lady Stoneheart. Wasn't it Black Walder who mentioned that the Brotherhood was causing them problems? And Wyman Manderly has been cast!
This could get interesting. Robin is after all Sansa's cousin, and things could change very drastically if he were to learn that Littlefinger killed his mother. A truth that Sansa knows.
Nevyn, on 31 May 2016 - 05:10 PM, said:
End of Disc One, on 31 May 2016 - 04:58 PM, said:
I hate how so many episodes end with a triumphant Dany moment
I hate when they end with a triumphant Dany speech and she hasnt really done anything new. When she kills Dothraki or walks through fire, yeah, end the episode. Last week's ending felt like high note for high note's sake.
Exactly. I knew they'd have a hard time keeping up the momentum of the last two episodes; I think this was their attempt to do that. It probably worked for some people; I doubt it worked for anyone here.
Lycaenion, on 31 May 2016 - 06:35 PM, said:
I mean, seriously, what is her motivation for all this? Why go through all this trouble just to go to Westeros, shake things up even more while they're already in disarray, and sit on a throne no one wants you on?
I dunno if that's really true. But that's something that the show has heretofore been bad at conveying. There are lots of loyal Targaryen folks; in the books, Dorne was among them. The episode coming up where Brienne meets Ian McShane...just before that happened in the books, she met some loyal Targaryen folk at Cracklaw Point. There are various families who fought for the Targaryens up till the end who are still loyal, though many of them had their titles and lands taken. In the books, Varys is a Targaryen loyalist; Barristan Selmy also found that role appealing once he was dismissed. Whether or not their faith is misplaced is another question.
Lycaenion, on 31 May 2016 - 06:35 PM, said:
Because your brother said that a Targ should sit on the throne and he's dead now? To take revenge? On who? Your father tried to burn freaking everybody, it's a good thing he's dead! You call Robert Baratheon an usurper, but you're about to do the same thing, but when you do it, it's okay? Sigh...she so annoys/frustrates me.
Her family ruled for hundreds of years, so it's not so difficult to understand her perspective. Her beliefs get murky when she looks at it in terms of her superior bloodline; she has her brother for an example, and the stories of her father. What Robert and Tywin did to her family was monstrous, though, maybe even moreso than what Aerys was doing before Jaime killed him. They even killed the children. It was a bad way for Robert to begin his rule. Targaryen children had to be hidden because Robert wanted them all dead, and thus we have Viserys and Dany and Jon. The gods tossed coins, and Viserys got tails and Jon heads. We're not entirely sure about Dany yet, though clearly her motives are mostly benevolent.
Lycaenion, on 31 May 2016 - 06:35 PM, said:
When, a couple of eps back, she started spouting off all her fancy titles and the khals burst out in laughter I was like FINALLY! Jezus woman, stop relying on your freaking titles and whatever you think you are owed.
She started out thinking she wasn't owed anything. She just wanted to go home. All this business about taking back the throne is basically just her trying to make the best of a bad situation.
Lycaenion, on 31 May 2016 - 06:35 PM, said:
I'll give her Breaker of Chains, but she's not the Mother of Dragons (she didn't even know how to feed them at first and has been mishandling them ever since), and the other titles are just meaningless.
"Mother of Dragons" was never a literal title; she is the one who figured out how to hatch the eggs and she walked into the fire to be with them as they were born.
Lycaenion, on 31 May 2016 - 06:35 PM, said:
I seriously believe she's going to turn out to be the bad guy in all of this. She's going to descend upon Westeros, destroy everything, go crazy like her old man and start screaming to burn them all. And she will then be promptly stabbed through the neck by Arya, who thinks she talks too damn much *fantasizes*. (Keep in mind, I only watch the show, I don't read the books, but I've been reading along with the Tor.com read).
My view is that she will probably die before we get a chance to really see what kind of a ruler she would be in the long run. I really doubt she'll die, either in the books or the show, as a bad guy.
I have felt for a long time now that the (secret) Targaryens of mixed blood will eventually trump the incest Targaryens (possibly including the incest Lannisters). But I also kind of expect Jon to die.
The President (2012) said:
Please proceed, Governor.
Chris Christie (2016) said:
Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:
And no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.