Chance, on 09 June 2025 - 01:58 PM, said:
I was alluding to his early criticism of season 1 (not heard of the watch alongs) which I found spot on and I'm usually a fairly harsh Sanderson critic. But what side you come down on in that argument is probably up to if you enjoyed tv-WoT.
For sure, but I'm am incredibly lax on what I'll permit in adaptation due to my friends in the industry who frequently explained to me why certain decisions were made (mostly Trek, which shoots in Toronto). Like I found ways to enjoy Shannara even though it very much made DRASTIC changes to the source material.
Chance, on 09 June 2025 - 01:58 PM, said:
I can certainly agree to that to some part, but there are some fairly faithful adaptations out there that where rather successful like LotR or Harry Potter. Now I think TV is a bit different but there are still the first few seasons of GoT which while not 1 to 1 conversions of the book are very recognizable to readers.
Eh, I feel like you've proven my point actually. Peter Jackson (and Philippa Boyens & Fran Walsh) faced a tonne of ire for their adaptation to the LOTR source material by purists. The main OneRing.net forums still to this day have scads of people who call you NARF (Not a Real Fan) if you like the PJ movies. I think the reason it works or mass audiences and was the success it was would be DUE to the adaptation choices he made. You can't shoot LOTR as it reads on the page, it would be overlong, boring, and not have compelled audiences as it did.
Harry Potter is an even better example of adaptation being an important art. The first two films, at the behest of original director Chris Columbus, were AS close to the source material as possible, and as a result are the weakest of the series film-wise...but once Cuaron, Newell, and especially Yates came on board, Steve Kloves writing of them got FAR better, more interesting, and were much more adapted in the traditional sense. As a result of stepping away from the slavish adherence to the source material in Columbus' entries, the series got INIFINITELY better. Like I can re-weatch CHAMBER...it's fine...but I can't rewatch the first one...in most re-watches I start at 3 and go forward because they are FAR better films, and that's largely on the back of them being adapted well for the medium. Moreover, if you watch the first two FANTASTIC BEASTS films you run into the same problem as Sanderson...Rowling wrote the screenplay for both, and her amateurishness in that medium is VERY present in both films as they adhere to whatever her book-author mind thinks it relevant...this is why WB forced Steve Kloves on her for the third film in the writing process, and the 3rd film is BY FAR the best of the bunch film-wise.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon