 I remember seeing it elsewhere (don't remember exactly where) and I asked a friend who used to teach english (I had the same question you do). It turns out it's correct and used for emphasis.
 I remember seeing it elsewhere (don't remember exactly where) and I asked a friend who used to teach english (I had the same question you do). It turns out it's correct and used for emphasis.   
						
						Posted 15 March 2005 - 02:43 AM
 I remember seeing it elsewhere (don't remember exactly where) and I asked a friend who used to teach english (I had the same question you do). It turns out it's correct and used for emphasis.
 I remember seeing it elsewhere (don't remember exactly where) and I asked a friend who used to teach english (I had the same question you do). It turns out it's correct and used for emphasis.   
						
						 
							  
								
						
					Posted 22 October 2004 - 06:07 PM
quote:
Now, something that can do that has gotta have some kind of safety catch.
 because remember when he saw all the slaughter towards the end of MoI how emotional he became? He decided that if the Seer won the war this is what would happen to the rest of the world. So he raised his hammer and asked Burn to forgive him? It was as if Brood was left broken by that sight.
 because remember when he saw all the slaughter towards the end of MoI how emotional he became? He decided that if the Seer won the war this is what would happen to the rest of the world. So he raised his hammer and asked Burn to forgive him? It was as if Brood was left broken by that sight.  
						
						Posted 18 June 2004 - 03:27 PM
 
							  
								
						
					Posted 22 October 2004 - 11:57 AM
Posted 18 June 2004 - 04:01 PM
 
						
						Posted 30 April 2004 - 06:53 AM
Posted 11 May 2004 - 10:16 AM
quote:
My one dislike of the book, and with the series is that the behavior of the gods (with the exception of Mael in MT) is very much like the Greek mythos. Many of the gods are running around intervening in the lives of mortals, manipulating them (or trying to), screwing them (both literally and well.. not so literally) and what not. I just want to have Erikson break away from that mode of behavior regarding the deity aspect of his series.
 ). And they ascended and became gods, it stands to reason that they would want to interfere and manipulate the world (inc. it's people, there friends and their enemies) in which they came from. The other god's I'm not sure about. . . (shrugs) But those I mentioned are pretty much the most active ones.
). And they ascended and became gods, it stands to reason that they would want to interfere and manipulate the world (inc. it's people, there friends and their enemies) in which they came from. The other god's I'm not sure about. . . (shrugs) But those I mentioned are pretty much the most active ones.
						
						Posted 02 May 2004 - 03:38 PM
Posted 27 April 2004 - 02:00 PM
Posted 23 May 2004 - 09:15 PM
 
						
						 
							  
								
						
					Posted 22 October 2004 - 05:10 PM
Posted 14 March 2005 - 07:56 PM
Posted 15 July 2004 - 05:14 AM

quote:
Is anybody else hot? Cancel the chocolate shake. Mmh, cheeseburgers.
Posted 17 June 2004 - 10:30 AM
Posted 10 May 2004 - 05:10 PM
Posted 02 November 2004 - 06:17 AM
 
							  
								
						
					Posted 22 October 2004 - 12:42 PM
Posted 06 May 2004 - 05:40 AM
 ) is the similar characters I see in MT ie. Tehol Beddict is basically a merchant version of QB/Kruppe, while Brys reminded me an awful lot of Ganoes Paran and even Itkovian, and (heresy!) Iron Bars was WJ reborn. Unless this was deliberate, SE's re-using his character bio's.
) is the similar characters I see in MT ie. Tehol Beddict is basically a merchant version of QB/Kruppe, while Brys reminded me an awful lot of Ganoes Paran and even Itkovian, and (heresy!) Iron Bars was WJ reborn. Unless this was deliberate, SE's re-using his character bio's.
						
						 
							  
								
						
					Posted 10 May 2004 - 04:45 PM
 
							  
								
						
					Posted 07 February 2004 - 05:51 AM