Cause, on 28 July 2022 - 06:32 PM, said:
What steps are being taken to end this war?
Russia seems to have wasted their military reputation, gained? A land bridge to crimea, and forced Finland to join nato. They seem to have lost strategically with no option for further gains. How do they continue, and what do they think they can achieve? Turning off the gas will just piss of Europe and hurt their own economy. Though in time they can switch to supplying China it won’t happen overnight.
Ukraine has surprised everyone with how well they have resisted but the fighting is all in their borders. The infrastructure damage is immense. I’m sure the west will suppport financially after the war but can they force a full Russian withdrawal?
The west at this point seems content to supply arms to Ukraine to slowly continue the Russian bleeding but what else?
Is this going to drag out for another 3 months? 6? Years?
It also sadly is losing its shock value and seems to have quickly fallen out of the news.
The war not being in the news every day isn't quite true: the BBC have a dedicated news page just to the conflict and they have reported one story or another from the front every single day since Day One. NATO, the UK, the US, the Baltic States, Poland, Romania, the Czech Republic and Slovakia are also all taking this conflict incredibly seriously and they see a Russian win as simply not being acceptable, because a Russian win will be followed by a repeat, either in a NATO state (thus triggering WWIII) or in another country like Georgia, Moldova or Kazakhstan. The sheer amount of equipment they are pouring into Ukraine at this point is quite ridiculous. There may not be too many "big ticket" items going in very often, but the simple multiple tons of ammunition going across the border every day are helping keep Ukraine in the fight.
As for the ultimate resolution, I think that's pretty clear: Russia must withdraw, at the absolute minimum, to its February 23rd positions, in return for which Ukraine may offer a peace on the terms they offered early in the conflict. Ukraine will agree not to join NATO and will agree to a series of referendums to determine the future of Crimea and the Donbas territories, overseen by the UN over a 15-year period. Ukraine may also require reparations, although the easiest way to do that is for the World Bank to simply transfer the reparation figure (between $100 and $300 billion) out of the frozen Russian assets it has (currently standing at around $500 billion) without bothering to get Russia's agreement. Then the west can agree to a phased reduction in sanctions as Russia complies with the terms. To be frank, even selling that to the Ukrainians I think is going to be tough. Several entire cities have been razed almost to the ground, they'll be de-mining the country for the next decade and the final death toll is almost certainly going to be (if it's not already) in the six figures.
The only short-to-medium term road to success Russia has is to try to complete the conquest of Donetsk and quickly declare victory there, and then negotiate a peace with Ukraine on more favourable terms to Russia, perhaps even giving up on Kherson and the land bridge as a major concession (since that was only useful when they thought they could take Odesa, which is now implausible), maybe in return for water supplies to Crimea being reinstated alongside other issues. But they keep Luhansk and Donetsk. And I don't think Ukraine is going to accept that. Even if they did, Russia is now immensely aware that it's in a losing race against Ukraine's further weapons reinforcement. When this war ends, Russia will need 5 years at the absolute minimum to rebuild its military to the point where it can even think about trying anything again, and by the end of those five years, Ukraine will probably be equipped with long-range HIMARS, the country will be covered in AA emplacements and it will have a standing army of half a million fully trained up to NATO standards, maybe with a thousand modern tanks and several hundred aircraft.