Abyss, on 10 February 2014 - 05:07 PM, said:
Egwene, on 10 February 2014 - 11:15 AM, said:
Any help to answer a few questions would be very welcome!!!
...................
In the process of editing the Wikia, I came across a very short entry for the Shriven:
The Shriven were soldiers of the Forkrul Assail armies in Kolanse. They were controlled by the Forkrul Assail by voice.
I am not sure about that definition... any suggestions?
'Soldiers of the FA empire in Kolanse, Shriven may have a tiny bit of FA blood in them, but are otherwise indistinguishable from humans. The children of The Snake may have been Shriven, explaining how they survived as long as they did'.
That's all from DoD. There's nothing to suggest the FA had to use their Voice to control the troops.
There were also two other levels of part-FA/human mixes... i can't exactly recall, possibly Watered and something else...
Watered were the ones who were mostly FA with just a bit of human (or something else) - they had the next highest ranking positions in the FA armies below the ten pureblood FA and seemed to be perfectly loyal to the FA cause without any need for coercion through the Akrhast Korvalain voice powers.
DoD made Shriven seem like they had to be part-FA, but after TCG I'm not entirely sure. The way Ganoes Paran talks about them in the first chapter or two of TCG could be taken either way, I think. There is definitely a remark in there about some of the Kolansii/Estobanii children in the fort having having longer limbs and being paler. So I think it is either
{a} Shriven means any Kolansii/Estobanii/etc the FA took control of
or
{b} Shriven refers to Kolansii/Estobanii/etc who have a small amount of FA blood, less than Watered. They are not automatically dedicated to the FA cause, like the boy in Paran's castle.
Which matches well the possible definitions of 'shrive':
shrive (ʃraɪv)
v. shrove shrived, shriv•en shrived, shriv•ing. v.t. 1. to impose penance on (a sinner).
2. to grant absolution to (a penitent).
{a} would go well with {1} - the FA imposed a penance on all the humans so they are all Shriven
but {b} would go well with {2} - the Shriven are those whom the FA granted some absolution to by bringing them into the FA cause with crossbreeding or whatever
I don't have my TCG handy, but I think there are some good sections from Paran and Brother Grave that would clear this up. I also think there's a late section from Brother Grave near the Barrow where he reaches out and suppresses all his army's emotions (after the marines laugh), showing that the FA do use their Akrhast Korvalain magic to directly coerce their human/Shriven armies.
Abyss, on 10 February 2014 - 05:07 PM, said:
Quote
...............
Anyone know there is any supporting evidence that the reptilian beast which Karsa battles early on in The Bonehunters is a K'Chain Nah'ruk?
Thanks!!
As of TB it seemed likely based on the fact that the beast in question had a short tail and the only other description we had of KN was from Ganath as she was clubbed in the head by one later in the book.
Now that we've got the rest of the MBF i go with that K'Chain being either a Ja'an sentinel or more likely a particularly nasty Shi'gal assassin (and before anyone says it, yes, i know that the Shi'gal in DoD/TCG is different in a tall lean way, but the books say he was the first one to have wings, so i figure he's not going to be a big bulky monster... and he was also extremely tall (taller than a Kell Hunter), strong AND HAD A SHORT TAIL).
The timing was also fishy in that we had Karsa fighting the monster, Ganath being killed by confirmed Nah'ruk, and Iccy & Mappo finding Sorrit crucified all in close times, as if a bunch of Nah'ruk had emerged/awakened on 7C together and caused all these events. But those could still be all related without the beast Karsa fought being a Nah'ruk (or being a non-vanilla kind of Nah'ruk, for that matter).