Malazan Empire: MAfia 88: Arkham City - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 141 Pages +
  • « First
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

MAfia 88: Arkham City NANA-NANA-NANA-NANA-RETCON!!!

#461 User is offline   Anomandaris 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 264
  • Joined: 06-November 08

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:08 PM

View PostGalain, on 05 June 2012 - 01:59 PM, said:


*snip*

Well, as far as I'm concerned the game has already been broken, lol.


Simple pragmatism dictates that he is scum if still alive. :tongue: But on the whole I agree with what you're saying. I was *going* to remove my vote in one post earlier before I left for work, but I forgot to do so, and then Meanas shovelling that insincere "I can change" bullshit topped off a rough night at work. Thus, I'm being petulant right now. I intend to keep being petulant for a while. But don't fret, I'm keeping an open mind and perusing the thread for other options.


Makes sense that by the game rules, he should be dead. But.. what if PS did not want to modkill a townie even though he'd broken the rules because it's already going to be a rough game for town? Does that make sense? Thats just kinda what I was thinking when they decided to mull it over and not MK him. Off to work. Go townies \m/

#462 User is offline   Galain 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:08 PM

Alright, petulant mode over.


More accurately, it's fucking 2am and I have to get up tomorrow. Not before the time-out however (and even if I did, not with enough time to catch up and vote before then). So I shall go and get some sleep. In the interests of not deliberately undermining town any more than Meanas already has, I will:


Remove Vote

Vote Eloth


Because he's the best option...and I still kinda want him lynched for his early day one comment. :tongue:

#463 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:11 PM

It is Day 1. 5 hours and 49 minutes left

22 people are still alive : Ampelas, Anomandaris, Anthras, Atrahal, D'riss, Eloth, Emurlahn, Fener, Galain, Karosis, Korbas, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Omtose, Osseric, Rashan, Sheptatha Lore, Spite, Telas, Thyrllan, Tulas Shorn

takes 12 votes to lynch or 11 to go to night.

4 votes for Eloth (Karosis, Emurlahn, Anomandaris, Galain)
1 vote for Fener ( Rashan)
1 vote for Rashan (Meanas)
3 votes for Meanas (Spite, Eloth, D'riss)
1 vote for D'riss (Atrahal)
3 vote for Emurlahn (Telas, Sheltata Lore)
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#464 User is offline   Galain 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:12 PM

View PostAnomandaris, on 05 June 2012 - 02:08 PM, said:

View PostGalain, on 05 June 2012 - 01:59 PM, said:

*snip*

Well, as far as I'm concerned the game has already been broken, lol.


Simple pragmatism dictates that he is scum if still alive. :tongue: But on the whole I agree with what you're saying. I was *going* to remove my vote in one post earlier before I left for work, but I forgot to do so, and then Meanas shovelling that insincere "I can change" bullshit topped off a rough night at work. Thus, I'm being petulant right now. I intend to keep being petulant for a while. But don't fret, I'm keeping an open mind and perusing the thread for other options.


Makes sense that by the game rules, he should be dead. But.. what if PS did not want to modkill a townie even though he'd broken the rules because it's already going to be a rough game for town? Does that make sense? Thats just kinda what I was thinking when they decided to mull it over and not MK him. Off to work. Go townies \m/



Oh, I concur. 'Tis one of the reason's Ment hates modkills. But as I said, I'm being petulant, because in this case not only was the rules-breakage flagrant and repeated several times (and he's clearly unrepentant) but because of the way it's been handled we're left in a messed up position where we can't be sure if he's off the hook because he's scum or if he's off the hook because of Ment's preferences as mod. And that's fucked up. Not only that but the lack of punishment encourages other people to do similar things in the future and it's just all-around bad manners regardless. Meanas should be dead, game balance be damned. And honestly, if it was *that* close a thing, Meanas wasn't far off in his assessment of our chances, really. :S


Anyway. BED!

#465 User is offline   Atrahal 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:12 PM

As far as it goes, I will be suspicious of anyone who continues to push for lynching Meanas merely to teach him a lesson, rather than for any other more substantive reason. It would clearly be advantageous for CLs and BM to divide us in this way.


As such, I'm finding the case for Eloth to be more substantial than that of my own case for D'riss.

Remove vote

Vote Eloth

#466 User is offline   Eloth 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:18 PM

View PostKarosis, on 05 June 2012 - 01:22 PM, said:

View PostEloth, on 05 June 2012 - 09:17 AM, said:

And as someone else said on this page, the Joker also mentioned a mayor. Now, there can be an interesting correlation there... did Meanas named the de-recruiter a mayor by accident or random choice, did he name a mayor because he read in the Penguin message and it stuck (by accident or deliberately), or did he post the Penguin message and then later capitulated on it? Am I correct in assuming that the Penguin post was before Meanas mentioned a mayor? Because that would eliminate the chance that the Penguin is digging Meanas an extra comfy snug deep grave through his message.

Despite my own fixation on the whole Meanas thing (he just rubs me the wrong way, seems extremely scummy and in addition to that there are plenty of quotes that support that feelingno matter whether or not there will be a modkill), I am quite satisfied so far with day 1.
The Osseric = BM/Joker thing can be wifom, but I bet it will be tested at some point, probably if we fail to lynch a CL/BM in the first 2-3 days, which is going to make Osseric a quite valuable asset for further analysis - if he's a dead man walking, cult may not want to touch him, BM won't jump into him and we will know who or what he was and how to read his statements.
That aside, we have several other statements, a good few quote posts, some active posting, little spam, and generally decent activity.

And now I'm out for a while.

This post stood out to me quite strongly, specifically the underlined section. Eloth is trying to get us to lynch Osseric at some point without explicitly stating that he finds Osseric scummy himself. If someone smart was trying to push an Osseric lynch, this is how they'd go about it - realising the lack of evidence to work with at the moment, they create an expectation and inevitability about his lynch in the future, all the while making it seem like they didn't have much to do with it. Knowing how to read Osseric's statements serves us no better than knowing how to read the statements of anyone else at this point.


I could see Eloth as a cult leader based on this post - trying to set up recruitments down the line while providing something his future followers could look over and interpret as orders. Key in the cults' thinking will be how to avoid recruiting the same player as someone else, and lo and behold Eloth is also trying to imply that the cult leaders should avoid picking Osseric.

I don't have much time, but I'm going to have a quick spin through the rest of Eloth's posts to see if there's anything there.




Or, le sigh, you just pick a single line from a post, tear it out of the context (which follows upon that sentence) misread it and present it as a case by someone smart setting someone else up for a lynch.


Now read it not as setting a lynch up (which is a symp's work, and to my knowledge this game doesn't have any) but in light of how Mafia games usually go on this forum. You see, there's this thing where we feel we let people off the hook, then we lynch them after all because of nagging suspicions: 'why would they point out person X? There must be something about person X!' My whole line about Osseric is that this is going to happen because of what the Joker coded about him. For reference, see also the post I made earlier about regular patterns taking over (Silencer being lynched for being too smooth, Vengey exploding, et cetera). There, explained?

Furthermore, to show my expectation is not coming out of left field, other people (and if you read back you will note that I have been almost completely silent on the issue of Osseric = BM/the Joker) have already mentioned chances of him being bad or not.
And even if he is random name X selected for shit and giggles by the Joker, he can still be a bad guy - it just seems less likely he is the Joker but all other options are as open as they are for you and me. I specifically called it wifom somewhere and I also said that The Joker would not target Osseric if he didn't stand to benefit by it. So, unless I am the Joker and I am indeed being oh so clever, why would I press on this? And if I am the Joker, why would I press on this and stand out?


Secondly, what motive could I possibly have for lynching Osseric specifically and setting that up halfway through day 1, or even earlier? It doesn't compute. As a townie, I don't care which big bat (see what I did there? tee hee for wordplay) we lynch but prefer any big bad evil dude over another townie.

If I were a big bad/bat, I wouldn't care who got lynched as long as it wasn't me. As such, there is no advantage whatsoever for setting Osseric up apart from trying to do it through an anonymous message. In a regular game, sure, you might have a point and I might be a symp. But here? Explain to me, if I am so fucking clever (which is just the way to make me seem dangerous through a compliment, so thank you not so much), why the flying fuck would I set up someone for lynching in 2-3 days time in a game with multiple recruits, kills, big ben jumps and god knows what?

#467 User is offline   Eloth 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:22 PM

View PostAnomandaris, on 05 June 2012 - 02:08 PM, said:

View PostGalain, on 05 June 2012 - 01:59 PM, said:

*snip*

Well, as far as I'm concerned the game has already been broken, lol.


Simple pragmatism dictates that he is scum if still alive. :tongue: But on the whole I agree with what you're saying. I was *going* to remove my vote in one post earlier before I left for work, but I forgot to do so, and then Meanas shovelling that insincere "I can change" bullshit topped off a rough night at work. Thus, I'm being petulant right now. I intend to keep being petulant for a while. But don't fret, I'm keeping an open mind and perusing the thread for other options.


Makes sense that by the game rules, he should be dead. But.. what if PS did not want to modkill a townie even though he'd broken the rules because it's already going to be a rough game for town? Does that make sense? Thats just kinda what I was thinking when they decided to mull it over and not MK him. Off to work. Go townies \m/


No, that's fucking bull shit. You design a game to be on the edge and exciting. Then it is to the players. If someone's stupid enough to go against the rules and deserves a modkill, you kill him and to hell with balance... in that respect a modkill is nothing different from a vig or so and if need be, you just don't reveal alignment after the modkill.
If the mod has to compensate before a game for a breaking of the rules on town side, he has to overpower town, and if he has to compensate scum for a fault on theirs, then he has to overpower them, resulting in a bad game experience and you get into a vicious design circle.

#468 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:23 PM

It is Day 1. 5 hours and 37 minutes left

22 people are still alive : Ampelas, Anomandaris, Anthras, Atrahal, D'riss, Eloth, Emurlahn, Fener, Galain, Karosis, Korbas, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Omtose, Osseric, Rashan, Sheptatha Lore, Spite, Telas, Thyrllan, Tulas Shorn

takes 12 votes to lynch or 11 to go to night.

5 votes for Eloth (Karosis, Emurlahn, Anomandaris, Galain, Atrahal)
1 vote for Fener ( Rashan)
1 vote for Rashan (Meanas)
3 votes for Meanas (Spite, Eloth, D'riss)
3 vote for Emurlahn (Telas, Sheltata Lore)
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#469 User is offline   Korbas 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:28 PM

@eloth.

My interest in this case is on the second part, where someone (I forget who) points out that a cult leader will likely be trying to figure out how to not target the same target. Which you point out not to target osseric.

#470 User is offline   Eloth 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:31 PM

Oh, as for people voting me, y what are you going to do if I remove my vote? Your whole theory of zomg he wants Meanas dead above all! then collapses, more or less (don't worry, I am not going to. Because I believe he is a recruiter. Honestly, I do. He's just too nervous and his defense is scattered, bad and many of the arguments he makes now he could have made earlier, but didn't.

If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it probably is a duck. Or a penguin. Or another animal.

What then remains is the issue of whether or not I try and set up Osseric for a lynch or for recruitment. I think I debunked setting him up for a lynch to the best of my ability and am not going to add to it.
Now what about the second bit, aka setting him up for recruitment? Once more, multiple people can play that game, and there are multiple cult leaders. It would be hilarious for any other cult leader to usurp the player I apparently chose for my first recruitment who will then lead my followers, now wouldn't it, say, on day 2 or 3?

In other words, that too is not exactly smart.
Which is exactly what Karosis is saying I am.

#471 User is offline   Sheltatha Lore 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:31 PM

I am not impressed with the Eloth 'case' at all, and his rebuttal basically outlines my problems with it. That one line does not strike me as setting up lynches at all, but rather speculates how we get hung up on people in our play.

I'm happier with my vote, as I think the thoughts behind Emur are far more substantial than this nonsense.

#472 User is offline   Eloth 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:32 PM

View PostKorbas, on 05 June 2012 - 02:28 PM, said:

@eloth.

My interest in this case is on the second part, where someone (I forget who) points out that a cult leader will likely be trying to figure out how to not target the same target. Which you point out not to target osseric.


Well, you will be very, very happy with the post I just made, then.

#473 User is offline   Sheltatha Lore 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:34 PM

Right now, town is the only team, but I still don't like how the votes just suddenly piled on to Eloth. Have people decided "well, time to choose our usual random"?

Those liking the 'case', color me suspicious that at least one of them is not town.

Emur's vote strikes me as pragmatic by attempting to move a potential spotlight on him.

#474 User is offline   Sheltatha Lore 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:37 PM

Anomandaris' vote seems to be a convenient slap-down vote on a likely candidate. Lazy IMO.

And Galain, "best option"? Because he has 3 votes?

I know in any other game I'd be called a symp, but that is irrelevant on Day 1 in this game, and it's refreshing to be able to call a spade a spade on this case. Un-im-press-ed.

#475 User is offline   Eloth 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:38 PM

In other words, if I place myself in the shoes of a townie, I see no cause for setting Osseric up. If I place myself in the shoes of a recruiter, I see no cause for setting Osseric up. If I place myself in the shoes of Batman... you might have a point. Up to a degree. But it was the Joker's little initiative that set all this stuff in motion. Nor was me being Batman the case on me, now was it, Karosis specifically called me a recruiter.

#476 User is offline   Sheltatha Lore 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:40 PM

View PostAtrahal, on 05 June 2012 - 02:12 PM, said:

As far as it goes, I will be suspicious of anyone who continues to push for lynching Meanas merely to teach him a lesson, rather than for any other more substantive reason. It would clearly be advantageous for CLs and BM to divide us in this way.


As such, I'm finding the case for Eloth to be more substantial than that of my own case for D'riss.

Remove vote

Vote Eloth


What about Emur?

I'm inclined to consider Ano and Galain over those opportunistic votes.

#477 User is offline   Atrahal 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:45 PM

View PostSheltatha Lore, on 05 June 2012 - 02:40 PM, said:

View PostAtrahal, on 05 June 2012 - 02:12 PM, said:

As far as it goes, I will be suspicious of anyone who continues to push for lynching Meanas merely to teach him a lesson, rather than for any other more substantive reason. It would clearly be advantageous for CLs and BM to divide us in this way.


As such, I'm finding the case for Eloth to be more substantial than that of my own case for D'riss.

Remove vote

Vote Eloth


What about Emur?

I'm inclined to consider Ano and Galain over those opportunistic votes.



I haven't seen enough to sway my vote towards Emurlahn, honestly. And Eloth's defence is not that of an innocent accused, IMO. I read it as a desperate man clutching in several different directions for safety, hoping one will be firm enough. Not convinced.

#478 User is offline   Sheltatha Lore 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:53 PM

Weird. I saw his response as 'logical'.

I gave up playing with my gut.

#479 User is offline   Eloth 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 93
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:54 PM

View PostSheltatha Lore, on 05 June 2012 - 02:37 PM, said:

Anomandaris' vote seems to be a convenient slap-down vote on a likely candidate. Lazy IMO.

And Galain, "best option"? Because he has 3 votes?

I know in any other game I'd be called a symp, but that is irrelevant on Day 1 in this game, and it's refreshing to be able to call a spade a spade on this case. Un-im-press-ed.


I guess people will soon start asking me who I judge a better lynch target than myself... as I tried to say (and ironically, what got me into this mess :tongue:): old patterns are hard to break. Despite good intentions like Big Tent Mafia. I think everyone who participated there should go and examine this day. Low posters let off the hook without a glance, vocal players jumping over one another, easy votes with little justification at the end of the day, still the same old same old. Just like having this as a pre-emptory whine :D


The crowd probably won't like my answer of Meanas as an alternative. If I name someone else, then others will say it comes out of left field to save my hide which must make me a recruiter or batman trying to save my skin.
I come up town and tomorrow everyone will say that it's long odds to get rid of scum on day 1 anyway. I could point towards Karosis for making a too easily debunked case but not only is that OMGUS but I honestly think he is town right now and someone who is trying to come to grips with mechanics, set-up and strategies.

#480 User is offline   Rashan 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 06-November 08

Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:55 PM

Wow, so much happens over night! Anyway, I'm all caught up...

PS - I removed my vote last night. But just to be clear.

REMOVE VOTE

Now, having read through all the arguments and stuff, and the more I think about it, I'm liking Meanas less and less for a Cult Leader. He has just made a few too many small mistakes regarding the rules thing, I think he's just a newb who didn't realize that town was its own faction. To be honest, until Korbas made it very clear that it was, I wasn't sure of that either. Anyway, all that to say that I'm happy not putting my vote there.

Regarding the cases on Eloth and Emurlahn, I find both to be very slim. That being said, because of how I feel about Meanas, and because Eloth seems to still be sure, by his own admission, that Meanas is a recruiter, well, I think he might just be a recruiter trying to direct a lynch train. For that reason, I'm going to

VOTE ELOTH

Share this topic:


  • 141 Pages +
  • « First
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

9 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users