Recently, lots of "oh, nothing is happening posts" - can't blame you there, we've all been moaning about it.Though "Oh, nothing is happening, said I'd check back, leaving now" is not exactly encouraging participation!
Mockra, on May 29 2009, 08:06 PM, said:
Shadow, on May 30 2009, 12:12 AM, said:
Oh and for Liosan I'd point out that Sil only had 2 votes when you claim the big "switcheroo" forced you to switch to him, the other 3 that came in rapid succession all came after your switch! There was only 2 hours on the clock though, so for now this isn't really that indicative of anything malicious, I'm just pointing it out.
I don't match my actions to my words?.. What do you mean by that..
You say I want to fulfil my own agenda.. do you think my voting for Telas then going offline and Telas being lynched was of my own agenda? Do you think voting for Sil as my Emur case wasn't going anywhere was my agenda? You don't seem to make much sense.. right now all I see if you making noise about nothing to make it seem like you are doing something productive..
There seems to be alot of talk about me and many of you say you are going to read my posts etc but im not sure how many of you have..
Moaning post.
Mockra, on May 29 2009, 07:55 AM, said:
I can't help it if scum feels the people I find suspicious are more innocent..
I was planning to go after Emur today but since he has been picked off, I might read into this Amp case
Says he'll look at Amp, nothing happens. But yeah, a bit of fuss has been made over the fact that everyone you suspect has died.
Mockra, on May 29 2009, 04:56 AM, said:
Ruse, on May 29 2009, 08:50 PM, said:
anyone else see the trend?
other than that he has been pretty quiet and not really confrontational.
Dunno...
Tennes? I don't remember that...
So far all my suspects have been lynched or nkd.. Im at a loss. I had a feeling that Emur was a symp so I might look into his posts.
This is interesting, because once again, Mockra didn't follow up on his "I'll look into..." statement.
Mockra, on May 29 2009, 12:52 AM, said:
Remove Vote
Vote Silanah
Didn't want to vote Silanah, but changed to get lynch.
Mockra, on May 28 2009, 10:15 PM, said:
Kessobahn, on May 29 2009, 02:06 PM, said:
Well I find it interesting that you don't want to cast a vote on Emur but you won't cast it on anybody else..
If you don't like the case in front of you, vote for someone else..
Fair enough, this is a good point. Then again, there is nothing wrong with pointing out that all the existing cases are shit.
Mockra, on May 28 2009, 10:11 PM, said:
Vote Emurlahn
More of Mockra's belief that you should vote for someone no matter what. Would have to check where other people had votes at the time to see if this was trying for a lynch or not.
Mockra, on May 28 2009, 07:57 PM, said:
Not sure when the last time was that we heard from HP...
Somehow I feel we are getting nowhere with all this discussion, it seems everyone is suspicious of those who attack them. Right now I am more inclined to vote for Emur for stiring shit up and thinking he knows what everything should be like.. If everyone played a certain role the same way, every game would be the same. His constant talking of symps may also be him signaling his role to his masters.
But hey, at least he had a reason to vote Emur. Same reason I didn't like Emur's posts. Though his later post above could be considered to say this has no substance, I don't think that's what Mockra meant - just that if there was something with "more" substance.
Mockra, on May 28 2009, 03:53 AM, said:
Korvalain, on May 28 2009, 07:25 PM, said:
Also, I'm not pleased with the Mockra bail.
Oh im sorry that I don't have the time to sit around on a computer waiting for posts on a forum.. I have better things to do.
I don't care much for any case right now, slow game is slow.
You, sir, had better have had a vote on someone when you said this!
Mockra, on May 28 2009, 02:37 AM, said:
Korvalain, on May 28 2009, 06:29 PM, said:
"Hope I'm not wrong?"? That one?
Edit: You are not alone (for now), but I'm going to be reading other stuff on the forum while I'm waiting to discuss.
Yes that one.
It seems like extra effort to ride off his train vote to make a bad lynch have nothing to do with him. Either a scum tactic or just wants to stay out of the limelight by not providing any original thoughts.
I don't think many people have provided original thoughts in this game, you included. Hell, probably me included. *sigh*
Mockra, on May 28 2009, 02:13 AM, said:
With 2 deaths, 18 players and the game being heavy roled I suspect that there are 2 killers and 1-2 symps. Symps might be all knowing or 1 for each killer. I doubt that anyone used their vig on day 1..
Tennes' kill seemed a little off but I guess the Korlat one isn't as surprising as he was pretty out there.
With Korlat and Telas gone I don't really have anything to go on..
Balance spec.
Both his suspects gone, so nothing to go on for the moment.
Mockra, on May 27 2009, 08:27 AM, said:
Vote Telas
For useless posts really...
Votes Telas for his 'useless posts'
Mockra, on May 27 2009, 08:07 AM, said:
I do hope we get a lynch by then but it seems we won't get enough votes in time. Right now I either wish to lynch Korlat based on a gut feeling that he is scum hiding in plain sight or Telas for his mindless posts.
Useless posts and hiding in plain sight are the offences judged unworthy by Mockra.
And that's it.
So, here's my thing with Mockra - all his suspects have died. He also has not made any cases, offered any 'original thoughts', or really done much other than complain and vote. Now, either he's 'hiding in plain sight', or is just plain lazy/bored.
I'm not sure what to make of Mockra, really. There is nothing...incriminating...in his posts. But then...I don't know. You just seem like you're doing all the stuff you tell other people not to at the same time.

Help

















