QuickTidal, on 09 July 2026 - 06:00 PM, said:
amphibian, on 09 July 2026 - 05:50 PM, said:
There's still a major lack of MENA representation in the film series as actors and writers that is actively holding this series back from being top line excellent.
You've made this statement multiple times and I still don't get it. Dune takes place tens of thousands of years in the future in a distant galaxy. Humans would no longer be even close to the easily distinct racial and country genetic makeup of earth now.
As such, the cast is just pretty typically diverse for a sci-fi fantasy movie - there are all colours and races repped by actors in the film, Caucasian, Black, East asian, Latino, Polynesian, Arab, ect. to show a human diversity. Why would MENA specifically be a thing in a far-flung future timeline where humanity has spread to the stars?
To be honest I do think he's got a point to an extent. Sure, realistically the Dune culture may not be literally MENA/Arabic, but it is very definitely coded that way. In particular the Fremen are based in large part on the Bedouin, but more broadly part of the basis of the story is an oil exploitation allergory and I do not think it is at all a coincidence that Herbert chose to use Arabic cultural codifiers for the people being exploited. I don't think the story can or should escape its influences and themes in that respect, regardless of the actual logical consequences of that amount of time.
I don't think it holds the film back from being great - and there are more influences than just Bedouin so it isn't as simple as that- but I do think it'd have been good to have more specific MENA representation in lead roles.
This was in particular focus in film 1 because of the way Villeneuve chose to make the Fremen language much less specifically Arabic than the book (iirc precisely because it's been so long so it wouldn't be that close) and yet has Yueh just straight up speaking Mandarin. That was disrespectful. Like it's one or the other my guy.
Like I say, it isn't film-ruining, I think they're absolutely great movies, but I think it's a valid critique.
Unrelatedly except tangenially: amph, have you read/had eyes on the recent SF debut The Republic of Memory by Mahmud El Sayed? It's not similar to Dune (it's a generation ship political SF thing) and I've only started really so I can't speak to its overall quality yet, but it's compelling early and, well, I bring it up coz it's
very Arabic. It got great reviews.
QuickTidal, on 09 July 2026 - 03:26 PM, said:
Yeah I watched the first 10 minutes or so and sorry, but it's rubbish. Despite playing it tonally as 'both sides are equally silly har har' there's a definite 'conservativism is just wanting to preserve the original meaning and progressive adaptations are meaningless' thing, but on top of that, the idea that there are no new stories is idiotic. It'd be idiotic even if you only considered movies, it's even more idiotic when you compare the huge range of new stories being created in books, games, and television. He's pretty much literally only talking about what's being created in the big studio machines, and even then his point is garbled (how does the Gunn Superman movie dilute meaning from Superman? What are you talking about, man?).
This post has been edited by polishgenius: 09 July 2026 - 07:47 PM
I can't carry it for you, but I can carry you.