[Khellendros]

Diplomacy, you big scaredy IH

[Imperial Historian]

Khellendros, on 18 May 2021 - 12:11 PM, said:

Diplomacy, you big scaredy IH

Terrified

It seemed the logical pick.

[Morgoth]

Tapper, on 18 May 2021 - 11:58 AM, said:

Morgoth, on 18 May 2021 - 07:51 AM, said:

I have to say, twelve. I am confused as to how you believe I have attacked you this game. You have attacked me, I have yet to activate a system of yours or break a deal with you

I think it might boil down to the pre-game statement that he considered Everra part of his slice?

That's a flimsy basis if so.

[D'rek]

@Morgoth I just realized I'm still holding Tekklar Legion, 'cause the battle on Ixth never got to the ground battle phase where I was expecting to play it. Totally forgot about it/didn't notice, sorry! I'll send it back first turn!

[Tapper]

@ D'rek, Khell and IH:
I will, as my first action, move to and trade with Khell - please let me know if you want the Trade Agreement or the War Funding first.
D'rek, IH: Feel free to trade me for the Commander/ 2 TG respectively during your turn, or, if you have trades planned already, I will send them your way on my turn 2 and 3.

[Morgoth]

D, on 18 May 2021 - 12:49 PM, said:

@Morgoth I just realized I'm still holding Tekklar Legion, 'cause the battle on Ixth never got to the ground battle phase where I was expecting to play it. Totally forgot about it/didn't notice, sorry! I'll send it back first turn!

Thanks, and no worries. If you need it again I am sure we can come to a cheap agreement, especially as you didn't find a use for it.

[Khellendros]

Tapper, on 18 May 2021 - 12:59 PM, said:

@ D'rek, Khell and IH:
I will, as my first action, move to and trade with Khell - please let me know if you want the Trade Agreement or the War Funding first.
D'rek, IH: Feel free to trade me for the Commander/ 2 TG respectively during your turn, or, if you have trades planned already, I will send them your way on my turn 2 and 3.

War Funding please. I can take the TA on my turn.

[twelve]

Morgoth, on 18 May 2021 - 07:51 AM, said:

I have to say, twelve. I am confused as to how you believe I have attacked you this game. You have attacked me, I have yet to activate a system of yours or break a deal with you

Everra. You poached in my area.

[D'rek]

Tapper, on 18 May 2021 - 12:59 PM, said:

@ D'rek, Khell and IH:
I will, as my first action, move to and trade with Khell - please let me know if you want the Trade Agreement or the War Funding first.
D'rek, IH: Feel free to trade me for the Commander/ 2 TG respectively during your turn, or, if you have trades planned already, I will send them your way on my turn 2 and 3.

Your first turn is before mine. Could you send it on your first turn instead, please?

[twelve]

Cost for a free refresh is 1 commodity and not doing anything that allows D'rek to wash hers unless she vacates Ixth as her first action.

[D'rek]

Morgoth, on 18 May 2021 - 05:46 AM, said:

Promissory Notes: 2 N'orr, 1 L1Z1X, 1 Letnev, 1 Muaat

Tapper, on 18 May 2021 - 11:53 AM, said:

Promissory Notes: 5 Letnev, 1 Sardakk (SFtT), 1 L1z1x (Alliance), 1 Muaat (Ceasefire)

Imperial Historian, on 18 May 2021 - 12:04 PM, said:

Promissory Notes: 3 Muaat 1 Letnev 2 Mahact

D, on 18 May 2021 - 12:07 PM, said:

Promissory Notes: 4 Hacan, 1 Vuil'raith, 1 Sardakk

Tattersail_, on 18 May 2021 - 12:42 PM, said:

Promissory Notes: 3 L1Z1X, 1 Sardakk, 1 Vul Raith, 1 Muatt

Khellendros, on 18 May 2021 - 01:02 PM, said:

Promissory Notes: 4 Vuil'Raith, 1 Hacan, 1 Mahact

twelve, on 18 May 2021 - 01:10 PM, said:

Promissory Notes: 2 Mahact, 1 Vuil'Raith

There's 40 PNs listed here and another 12 in people's play areas for 52 total

There are only 41 PNs in this game. So there's a LOT of mistakes in here. Like Tapper, it's hard to believe after you've made PN deals with me, Morgoth, and IH you still have 5 Letnev cards in your hand???

I looked back several posts and a lot of these have been unchanged for a long time so I have no idea when they became erroneous.

[Galactic Council]

Yeah, I've been pretty slack on 'auditing' things like PNs and action card numbers in people's game posts, but I think people's game PMs should be pretty up to date.

Yall can argue with each other over your game PNs.

[Khellendros]

Corrected mine. In my defence, I don't know how to count.

[D'rek]

twelve, on 18 May 2021 - 01:12 PM, said:

Cost for a free refresh is 1 commodity and not doing anything that allows D'rek to wash hers unless she vacates Ixth as her first action.

If I send everything at Ixth to Accoen/Jeol'ir and take both planets, does that count for "vacating Ixth as her first action" ?

[Tattersail_]

twelve, on 18 May 2021 - 01:12 PM, said:

Cost for a free refresh is 1 commodity and not doing anything that allows D'rek to wash hers unless she vacates Ixth as her first action.

How about you have your ceasefire back. In return you give me and Khell a free refresh, and 2 TG's.

[D'rek]

Khellendros, on 18 May 2021 - 01:22 PM, said:

Corrected mine. In my defence, I don't know how to count.

I think it's still wrong. You're only supposed to list the PNs in your hand, right? So no Mahact card as that is in your play area.

[D'rek]

Tattersail_, on 18 May 2021 - 01:24 PM, said:

twelve, on 18 May 2021 - 01:12 PM, said:

Cost for a free refresh is 1 commodity and not doing anything that allows D'rek to wash hers unless she vacates Ixth as her first action.

How about you have your ceasefire back. In return you give me and Khell a free refresh, and 2 TG's.

Did you see my earlier suggestion about the ceasefire?

[Tattersail_]

I had a Muatt one and it changed to Mahact so I have rectified that.

[Khellendros]

D, on 18 May 2021 - 01:26 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 18 May 2021 - 01:22 PM, said:

Corrected mine. In my defence, I don't know how to count.

I think it's still wrong. You're only supposed to list the PNs in your hand, right? So no Mahact card as that is in your play area.

I thought we agreed to list all PNs held total (as in, owned), and then list in other those of the total which are in the play area.

[D'rek]

Khellendros, on 18 May 2021 - 01:41 PM, said:

D, on 18 May 2021 - 01:26 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 18 May 2021 - 01:22 PM, said:

Corrected mine. In my defence, I don't know how to count.

I think it's still wrong. You're only supposed to list the PNs in your hand, right? So no Mahact card as that is in your play area.

I thought we agreed to list all PNs held total (as in, owned), and then list in other those of the total which are in the play area.

Galactic Council, on 19 April 2021 - 03:15 PM, said:

D, on 19 April 2021 - 12:23 PM, said:

We ended up getting into this game so fast we didn't really finish up any of the resolutions from the serious post-game thread. So a couple misc notes/questions (moreso for Blend but also for everyone)

PNs -- we should start distinguishing PNs in hand vs in play area in status blocks? (we can specify both, or the existing listing can just only refer to hand)

Please list what's in your hand. If it's in the play area, it should be in your play area, but not listed in the PNs section of your game post.