Malazan Empire: Twilight Imperium (II) - Chatty Thread - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 292 Pages +
  • « First
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Twilight Imperium (II) - Chatty Thread

#661 User is offline   Itwęs Nom 

  • Inquisitor of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 20 July 2018 - 04:14 PM

@ih

After a reconsideration, IF I came to terms with Gnaw to keep away from the alpha wormhole for some time, I'd be willing to negotiate you taking Mehar Xull for the round to complete the objective under the circumstances that you do so as late in the round as possible and you only take 1 infantry and 1 ship to carry them. If that's still possible.

(I spent my morning puking all over the place for about 6 hours)
All things fall from kings to rose petals
0

#662 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 July 2018 - 04:23 PM

Gnaw are you using warfare as your first action?

IH I'm going to be using trade first and you will likely be excluded from the refresh unless I can be assured of a couple things. First you will move the destroyer out of my path to Rex before the end of this round and Second you won't make any move on the Meer system this round. Thoughts, counter proposals, role play entertainment, etc.?
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#663 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 20 July 2018 - 04:35 PM

View PostItwęs Nom, on 20 July 2018 - 04:14 PM, said:

@ih

After a reconsideration, IF I came to terms with Gnaw to keep away from the alpha wormhole for some time, I'd be willing to negotiate you taking Mehar Xull for the round to complete the objective under the circumstances that you do so as late in the round as possible and you only take 1 infantry and 1 ship to carry them. If that's still possible.

(I spent my morning puking all over the place for about 6 hours)


I could agree to that. Hope you are feeling better!
1

#664 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 20 July 2018 - 04:39 PM

View Posttwelve, on 20 July 2018 - 04:23 PM, said:

Gnaw are you using warfare as your first action?

IH I'm going to be using trade first and you will likely be excluded from the refresh unless I can be assured of a couple things. First you will move the destroyer out of my path to Rex before the end of this round and Second you won't make any move on the Meer system this round. Thoughts, counter proposals, role play entertainment, etc.?


The Creuss express dismay, they were not aware that such a puny ship would be of concern to such as the winnu can you not simply pass through the void to arrive at rex unharmed?

The Creuss are always willing to trade with those not at one with the void, a cessation of hostilities for the round could certainly be agreed for trade rights.
0

#665 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,619
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 20 July 2018 - 04:44 PM

I think you skipped Morgoth, Tatts?

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#666 User is offline   Itwęs Nom 

  • Inquisitor of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 20 July 2018 - 04:54 PM

Now I just need Gnaw to accept my offer IH

Khell about when are you intending to play logistics? I could pay you 1 tg, possibly 2 if I get to pillage IH this round, or pay the rest next round if not or you wanted more, to play it 2nd turn? I'm also not in rush for you to take the carrier away, but there's some chance I'll destroy it by the end of the turn if it's still there, as you didn't seem bothered by that happening. What do you say?

That'd mean I'd need @Gnaw to hold off 3 turns before taking Lodor. Well you have to play warfare first anyway so that means waiting 2 turns, is that acceptable for the action card, my dear slithery excoconsul?
All things fall from kings to rose petals
0

#667 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 July 2018 - 04:58 PM

It's not a concern but more a matter of convenience. Instead of spending multiple actions to remove or go around the ship I can fly through unmolested. The void to Rex isn't yet open to me.

And as I find your negotiations open for interpretation and misunderstanding could you please speak clearly and concisely if my full proposal of you agreeing to not activating the system containing the planet Meer for the remaing of the round by your forces and the destroyer directly north of the Meer system will vacate sometime before the end of this round (and no new units will replace this unit when you leave in case you wanted to pull a Tattersail). In exchange I will provide you with a free refesh of your commodities. Is this acceptable?
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#668 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:05 PM

View Posttwelve, on 20 July 2018 - 04:58 PM, said:

It's not a concern but more a matter of convenience. Instead of spending multiple actions to remove or go around the ship I can fly through unmolested. The void to Rex isn't yet open to me.

And as I find your negotiations open for interpretation and misunderstanding could you please speak clearly and concisely if my full proposal of you agreeing to not activating the system containing the planet Meer for the remaing of the round by your forces and the destroyer directly north of the Meer system will vacate sometime before the end of this round (and no new units will replace this unit when you leave in case you wanted to pull a Tattersail). In exchange I will provide you with a free refesh of your commodities. Is this acceptable?


Yes I will agree to that. I make no promises about moving into that hex again in future rounds though.
0

#669 User is offline   Tapper 

  • Lover of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 6,683
  • Joined: 29-June 04
  • Location:Delft, Holland.

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:11 PM

View PostImperial Historian, on 20 July 2018 - 03:35 PM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:27 PM, said:

View PostD, on 20 July 2018 - 03:24 PM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:12 PM, said:

D'rek what happens to your carrier when I move my carrier and infantry into Mansa 3 this turn? I plan on leaving Abyz/Fria undefended but what is to stop you from moving in on them when I do. Especially considering the new objective. Obviously I want good relations with you and do plan on production biomes going in your favour, exchange of SFTT when I vacate Mansa round 3. I just want your thoughts on the matter before making any moves.


It is tempting given the latest public objective... but it's not my intention. If it would reassure you more, do you want to just trade PNs now? How about we exchange both Ceasefires and Trade Agreements, and in exchange you can just keep Mansa III for the rest of the game?


I'd trade both of those things now, and still let you take Mansa in a future round if you'd want it.


Tatts you realise that's effectively you paying d'rek 4 TG to do what she was going to anyway?

If she doesn't research gravity drive in order to move her carrier to Arnor lor I'll be shocked!

Also, she's offering you Mansa and you don't take it. I get that you want to make sure you have a stable alliance with D'rek, but you trade away so many advantages with hardly a concession from her side that pretty soon, you run out of compensations to grant when you would like her to make a move that benefits you and hurts her.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
0

#670 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:12 PM

Tatts we still good for 3 for 3 trade?
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#671 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:15 PM

View PostImperial Historian, on 20 July 2018 - 05:05 PM, said:

View Posttwelve, on 20 July 2018 - 04:58 PM, said:

It's not a concern but more a matter of convenience. Instead of spending multiple actions to remove or go around the ship I can fly through unmolested. The void to Rex isn't yet open to me.

And as I find your negotiations open for interpretation and misunderstanding could you please speak clearly and concisely if my full proposal of you agreeing to not activating the system containing the planet Meer for the remaing of the round by your forces and the destroyer directly north of the Meer system will vacate sometime before the end of this round (and no new units will replace this unit when you leave in case you wanted to pull a Tattersail). In exchange I will provide you with a free refesh of your commodities. Is this acceptable?


Yes I will agree to that. I make no promises about moving into that hex again in future rounds though.

I understand. As long as it's free by you at the end of the round I'm good. I'd actually would prefer you waiting as long as possible to move it so no one else is likely to claim it and I have the same problem next round.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#672 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,619
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:19 PM

View Posttwelve, on 20 July 2018 - 05:15 PM, said:

View PostImperial Historian, on 20 July 2018 - 05:05 PM, said:

View Posttwelve, on 20 July 2018 - 04:58 PM, said:

It's not a concern but more a matter of convenience. Instead of spending multiple actions to remove or go around the ship I can fly through unmolested. The void to Rex isn't yet open to me.

And as I find your negotiations open for interpretation and misunderstanding could you please speak clearly and concisely if my full proposal of you agreeing to not activating the system containing the planet Meer for the remaing of the round by your forces and the destroyer directly north of the Meer system will vacate sometime before the end of this round (and no new units will replace this unit when you leave in case you wanted to pull a Tattersail). In exchange I will provide you with a free refesh of your commodities. Is this acceptable?


Yes I will agree to that. I make no promises about moving into that hex again in future rounds though.

I understand. As long as it's free by you at the end of the round I'm good. I'd actually would prefer you waiting as long as possible to move it so no one else is likely to claim it and I have the same problem next round.


This is making me nervous...

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#673 User is offline   Itwęs Nom 

  • Inquisitor of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:27 PM

@IH what about you pay Tatts for my action card trade with Gnaw so I can agree to the alpha wormhole placement on Mehar Xull? Or use your good relations to not have to pay anything or whatever, obviously I wouldn't be pillaging this particular trade

Where's the turtles again
All things fall from kings to rose petals
0

#674 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:46 PM

View PostItwęs Nom, on 20 July 2018 - 05:27 PM, said:

@IH what about you pay Tatts for my action card trade with Gnaw so I can agree to the alpha wormhole placement on Mehar Xull? Or use your good relations to not have to pay anything or whatever, obviously I wouldn't be pillaging this particular trade

Where's the turtles again


I think that's a few too many steps to be agreeing a deal. Tatts needs to place the wormhole and gnaw needs to agree (and be happy having the alpha wormhole there which I think he isn't, in which case the deal is off anyway)
0

#675 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,268
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:49 PM

View PostD, on 20 July 2018 - 04:44 PM, said:

I think you skipped Morgoth, Tatts?

I thought I was third
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#676 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,619
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:49 PM

So do you think Twelve has an Unexpected Action AC and plans to take MR at the end of this round once IH moves the destroyer, or what?

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#677 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,619
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:50 PM

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 05:49 PM, said:

View PostD, on 20 July 2018 - 04:44 PM, said:

I think you skipped Morgoth, Tatts?

I thought I was third


Nopers

View PostGalactic Council, on 20 July 2018 - 03:08 PM, said:

Action Phase 2 - Start

Initiative Order: IH > Tapper > Morgoth > Tattersail > Twelve > Gnaw > D'rek > Khellendros > ItWasBliss


View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#678 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,268
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:51 PM

I'll be on soon
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#679 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:54 PM

View PostItwęs Nom, on 20 July 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:

Sure

Gnawwwwww

CF | Experimental Battlestation | Play at the Space Cannon part of a Tactical Action (yours or another player's) | Choose one of your space docks either in or adjacent to the activated system. That space dock uses Space Cannon 5 (x3) against ships in the active system.

(What does the CF stand for?)


Oh. I like that.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#680 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,166
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 20 July 2018 - 05:56 PM

Tatts I wasn't expecting you to use construction card so soon.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

Share this topic:


  • 292 Pages +
  • « First
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users