Malazan Empire: Twilight Imperium (II) - Chatty Thread - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 292 Pages +
  • « First
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Twilight Imperium (II) - Chatty Thread

#641 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:00 PM

View PostItwęs Nom, on 20 July 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:

Sure

Gnawwwwww

CF | Experimental Battlestation | Play at the Space Cannon part of a Tactical Action (yours or another player's) | Choose one of your space docks either in or adjacent to the activated system. That space dock uses Space Cannon 5 (x3) against ships in the active system.

(What does the CF stand for?)


I think the CF is just a way to sort the cards. Not sure, D'rek would probably know if there is more meaning to those codes.
0

#642 User is offline   Itwęs Nom 

  • Inquisitor of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:01 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 20 July 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:

Nom, Tapper just took Diplomacy, so there goes that decision for you anyway.


I noticed, buying off both of you would probably be too costly anyway
All things fall from kings to rose petals
0

#643 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:04 PM

View PostItwęs Nom, on 20 July 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:

Sure

Gnawwwwww

CF | Experimental Battlestation | Play at the Space Cannon part of a Tactical Action (yours or another player's) | Choose one of your space docks either in or adjacent to the activated system. That space dock uses Space Cannon 5 (x3) against ships in the active system.

(What does the CF stand for?)



Oh I can think of one person who would like that card ;)
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#644 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:05 PM

So Khell are you proposing a straight swap? I don't see much use for it at this stage but maybe at a later stage. Yet I accept if you are willing.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#645 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:06 PM

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:05 PM, said:

So Khell are you proposing a straight swap? I don't see much use for it at this stage but maybe at a later stage. Yet I accept if you are willing.



Yes, I was thinking it could prove useful to you later on down the line. And probably only you really. Yep, I agree to a straight swap, pleasure doing business.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#646 User is offline   Itwęs Nom 

  • Inquisitor of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:10 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 20 July 2018 - 03:04 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 20 July 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:

Sure

Gnawwwwww

CF | Experimental Battlestation | Play at the Space Cannon part of a Tactical Action (yours or another player's) | Choose one of your space docks either in or adjacent to the activated system. That space dock uses Space Cannon 5 (x3) against ships in the active system.

(What does the CF stand for?)



Oh I can think of one person who would like that card ;)


Yeah I can see how now

I'll wait on Gnaw's response first though
All things fall from kings to rose petals
0

#647 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:12 PM

D'rek what happens to your carrier when I move my carrier and infantry into Mansa 3 this turn? I plan on leaving Abyz/Fria undefended but what is to stop you from moving in on them when I do. Especially considering the new objective. Obviously I want good relations with you and do plan on production biomes going in your favour, exchange of SFTT when I vacate Mansa round 3. I just want your thoughts on the matter before making any moves.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#648 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:12 PM

View PostItwęs Nom, on 20 July 2018 - 03:10 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 20 July 2018 - 03:04 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 20 July 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:

Sure

Gnawwwwww

CF | Experimental Battlestation | Play at the Space Cannon part of a Tactical Action (yours or another player's) | Choose one of your space docks either in or adjacent to the activated system. That space dock uses Space Cannon 5 (x3) against ships in the active system.

(What does the CF stand for?)



Oh I can think of one person who would like that card ;)


Yeah I can see how now

I'll wait on Gnaw's response first though



Of course.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#649 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:13 PM

View PostKhellendros, on 20 July 2018 - 03:06 PM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:05 PM, said:

So Khell are you proposing a straight swap? I don't see much use for it at this stage but maybe at a later stage. Yet I accept if you are willing.



Yes, I was thinking it could prove useful to you later on down the line. And probably only you really. Yep, I agree to a straight swap, pleasure doing business.


When do we activate this exchange?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#650 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:15 PM

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:13 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 20 July 2018 - 03:06 PM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:05 PM, said:

So Khell are you proposing a straight swap? I don't see much use for it at this stage but maybe at a later stage. Yet I accept if you are willing.



Yes, I was thinking it could prove useful to you later on down the line. And probably only you really. Yep, I agree to a straight swap, pleasure doing business.


When do we activate this exchange?



Oh yeah, duh, it's not immediate. On your turn I guess, seeing as you'll go before me?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#651 User is offline   Tapper 

  • Lover of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 6,683
  • Joined: 29-June 04
  • Location:Delft, Holland.

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:20 PM

View PostItwęs Nom, on 20 July 2018 - 03:01 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 20 July 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:

Nom, Tapper just took Diplomacy, so there goes that decision for you anyway.


I noticed, buying off both of you would probably be too costly anyway

Yeah, sorry. Logistics is hardly a choice for me, but great for Khell and decent for you and Imperial... well, with no shot at Mecatol, it's not my cup of tea either - once again, pretty OK for Khell and slightly less so for you, imho.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
0

#652 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,619
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:21 PM

View PostGalactic Council, on 20 July 2018 - 03:00 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 20 July 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:

Sure

Gnawwwwww

CF | Experimental Battlestation | Play at the Space Cannon part of a Tactical Action (yours or another player's) | Choose one of your space docks either in or adjacent to the activated system. That space dock uses Space Cannon 5 (x3) against ships in the active system.

(What does the CF stand for?)


I think the CF is just a way to sort the cards. Not sure, D'rek would probably know if there is more meaning to those codes.


It's for sorting, and to distinguish the duplicate cards so you don't accidentally lose one somewhere without realizing.

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#653 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,619
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:24 PM

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:12 PM, said:

D'rek what happens to your carrier when I move my carrier and infantry into Mansa 3 this turn? I plan on leaving Abyz/Fria undefended but what is to stop you from moving in on them when I do. Especially considering the new objective. Obviously I want good relations with you and do plan on production biomes going in your favour, exchange of SFTT when I vacate Mansa round 3. I just want your thoughts on the matter before making any moves.


It is tempting given the latest public objective... but it's not my intention. If it would reassure you more, do you want to just trade PNs now? How about we exchange both Ceasefires and Trade Agreements, and in exchange you can just keep Mansa III for the rest of the game?

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#654 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:27 PM

View PostD, on 20 July 2018 - 03:24 PM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:12 PM, said:

D'rek what happens to your carrier when I move my carrier and infantry into Mansa 3 this turn? I plan on leaving Abyz/Fria undefended but what is to stop you from moving in on them when I do. Especially considering the new objective. Obviously I want good relations with you and do plan on production biomes going in your favour, exchange of SFTT when I vacate Mansa round 3. I just want your thoughts on the matter before making any moves.


It is tempting given the latest public objective... but it's not my intention. If it would reassure you more, do you want to just trade PNs now? How about we exchange both Ceasefires and Trade Agreements, and in exchange you can just keep Mansa III for the rest of the game?


I'd trade both of those things now, and still let you take Mansa in a future round if you'd want it.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#655 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:34 PM

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:27 PM, said:

View PostD, on 20 July 2018 - 03:24 PM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:12 PM, said:

D'rek what happens to your carrier when I move my carrier and infantry into Mansa 3 this turn? I plan on leaving Abyz/Fria undefended but what is to stop you from moving in on them when I do. Especially considering the new objective. Obviously I want good relations with you and do plan on production biomes going in your favour, exchange of SFTT when I vacate Mansa round 3. I just want your thoughts on the matter before making any moves.


It is tempting given the latest public objective... but it's not my intention. If it would reassure you more, do you want to just trade PNs now? How about we exchange both Ceasefires and Trade Agreements, and in exchange you can just keep Mansa III for the rest of the game?


I'd trade both of those things now, and still let you take Mansa in a future round if you'd want it.



Why are you negotiating a worse deal than she's offering?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#656 User is offline   Itwęs Nom 

  • Inquisitor of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,538
  • Joined: 02-August 15

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:35 PM

View PostTapper, on 20 July 2018 - 03:20 PM, said:

View PostItwęs Nom, on 20 July 2018 - 03:01 PM, said:

View PostKhellendros, on 20 July 2018 - 02:59 PM, said:

Nom, Tapper just took Diplomacy, so there goes that decision for you anyway.


I noticed, buying off both of you would probably be too costly anyway

Yeah, sorry. Logistics is hardly a choice for me, but great for Khell and decent for you and Imperial... well, with no shot at Mecatol, it's not my cup of tea either - once again, pretty OK for Khell and slightly less so for you, imho.


Of course no issues with it
All things fall from kings to rose petals
0

#657 User is offline   Imperial Historian 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 7,883
  • Joined: 08-February 04

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:35 PM

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:27 PM, said:

View PostD, on 20 July 2018 - 03:24 PM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:12 PM, said:

D'rek what happens to your carrier when I move my carrier and infantry into Mansa 3 this turn? I plan on leaving Abyz/Fria undefended but what is to stop you from moving in on them when I do. Especially considering the new objective. Obviously I want good relations with you and do plan on production biomes going in your favour, exchange of SFTT when I vacate Mansa round 3. I just want your thoughts on the matter before making any moves.


It is tempting given the latest public objective... but it's not my intention. If it would reassure you more, do you want to just trade PNs now? How about we exchange both Ceasefires and Trade Agreements, and in exchange you can just keep Mansa III for the rest of the game?


I'd trade both of those things now, and still let you take Mansa in a future round if you'd want it.


Tatts you realise that's effectively you paying d'rek 4 TG to do what she was going to anyway?

If she doesn't research gravity drive in order to move her carrier to Arnor lor I'll be shocked!
0

#658 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,619
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:40 PM

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:27 PM, said:

View PostD, on 20 July 2018 - 03:24 PM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:12 PM, said:

D'rek what happens to your carrier when I move my carrier and infantry into Mansa 3 this turn? I plan on leaving Abyz/Fria undefended but what is to stop you from moving in on them when I do. Especially considering the new objective. Obviously I want good relations with you and do plan on production biomes going in your favour, exchange of SFTT when I vacate Mansa round 3. I just want your thoughts on the matter before making any moves.


It is tempting given the latest public objective... but it's not my intention. If it would reassure you more, do you want to just trade PNs now? How about we exchange both Ceasefires and Trade Agreements, and in exchange you can just keep Mansa III for the rest of the game?


I'd trade both of those things now, and still let you take Mansa in a future round if you'd want it.


Sure, sounds good to me. Your turn comes first, so let's do it then. And if you do end up wanting to keep Mansa III the whole game, that's fine.

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#659 User is offline   Khellendros 

  • Saboteur of High House Mafia
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 7,298
  • Joined: 14-August 07

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:43 PM

Morgoth, hi, how's Indonesia going? Say, can I have the Speaker token?
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
0

#660 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,267
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 20 July 2018 - 03:44 PM

View PostD, on 20 July 2018 - 03:40 PM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:27 PM, said:

View PostD, on 20 July 2018 - 03:24 PM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 20 July 2018 - 03:12 PM, said:

D'rek what happens to your carrier when I move my carrier and infantry into Mansa 3 this turn? I plan on leaving Abyz/Fria undefended but what is to stop you from moving in on them when I do. Especially considering the new objective. Obviously I want good relations with you and do plan on production biomes going in your favour, exchange of SFTT when I vacate Mansa round 3. I just want your thoughts on the matter before making any moves.


It is tempting given the latest public objective... but it's not my intention. If it would reassure you more, do you want to just trade PNs now? How about we exchange both Ceasefires and Trade Agreements, and in exchange you can just keep Mansa III for the rest of the game?


I'd trade both of those things now, and still let you take Mansa in a future round if you'd want it.


Sure, sounds good to me. Your turn comes first, so let's do it then. And if you do end up wanting to keep Mansa III the whole game, that's fine.


Okay no problem.

Trade PN's and Ceasefire on my turn, i'll prepare now.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

Share this topic:


  • 292 Pages +
  • « First
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users