[Tapper]

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 06:14 PM, said:

 Tapper, on 19 May 2018 - 05:05 PM, said:

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 03:38 PM, said:

 Tapper, on 19 May 2018 - 03:19 PM, said:

 Imperial Historian, on 19 May 2018 - 08:33 AM, said:

 Tapper, on 19 May 2018 - 07:05 AM, said:

@IH: Tatts will allow me to place his alpha wormhole next round.

In light of all the stuff Blend is doing/has done (essentially, becoming an aggressive military-industrial complex), how would you feel about Tatts putting the wormhole in Torkan-Tequran next round? I will guarantee that I will send sufficient power through the wormhole to deal with any invader (or die trying) and not take your planets.

I'm not exactly thrilled about a wormhole being there. After all even if you don't take my planets, blend and tatts could pop through and attack me.

That said for your word not to attack me... How about you give me your racial PN and I give you my votes to assign as you will this round? Gives me some security in case you attack me and a bit of a defence if tatts or blend attacks me?

Well, I would be open to trading my PN to you at this stage, but we'd need the wormhole first. If you are worried about Blend using the wormhole to invade through Lodor, the best option is that I won't ask Tatts to place the wormhole there

I thought you wereally interested in my racial pn tapper. I have it back now.

I am. To be honest, when you mentioned the Trade PN to Gnaw I figured you meant Blends racial PN.

Still am, and after your recent research, I think I could be a good partner. It depends on your conditions for a trade. and how much Blend matters in your deal-making.

Our dealings are just that our Dealings. Lets just focus on that. Your racial pn is something I'm very keen on having in my back pocket but I'm planning on researching Assault Cannons next round and that is a very strong military tech to have which I'm sure you would make very good use of so the price for my pn has to be more than just your racial pn.. What more are you willing to throw in for the trade?

You still owe me 5 votes. I am happy to absolve you of that. In addition, what about a non-aggression treaty for a round and a half (active immediately until after next round?).
That would also exclude me from asking Tatts to open a wormhole in your systems.

[Nicodimas]

Back catching up !

Waited in line for NiN tickets so all sidetracked.

[twelve]

 Tapper, on 19 May 2018 - 06:20 PM, said:

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 06:14 PM, said:

 Tapper, on 19 May 2018 - 05:05 PM, said:

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 03:38 PM, said:

 Tapper, on 19 May 2018 - 03:19 PM, said:

 Imperial Historian, on 19 May 2018 - 08:33 AM, said:

 Tapper, on 19 May 2018 - 07:05 AM, said:

@IH: Tatts will allow me to place his alpha wormhole next round.

In light of all the stuff Blend is doing/has done (essentially, becoming an aggressive military-industrial complex), how would you feel about Tatts putting the wormhole in Torkan-Tequran next round? I will guarantee that I will send sufficient power through the wormhole to deal with any invader (or die trying) and not take your planets.

I'm not exactly thrilled about a wormhole being there. After all even if you don't take my planets, blend and tatts could pop through and attack me.

That said for your word not to attack me... How about you give me your racial PN and I give you my votes to assign as you will this round? Gives me some security in case you attack me and a bit of a defence if tatts or blend attacks me?

Well, I would be open to trading my PN to you at this stage, but we'd need the wormhole first. If you are worried about Blend using the wormhole to invade through Lodor, the best option is that I won't ask Tatts to place the wormhole there

I thought you wereally interested in my racial pn tapper. I have it back now.

I am. To be honest, when you mentioned the Trade PN to Gnaw I figured you meant Blends racial PN.

Still am, and after your recent research, I think I could be a good partner. It depends on your conditions for a trade. and how much Blend matters in your deal-making.

Our dealings are just that our Dealings. Lets just focus on that. Your racial pn is something I'm very keen on having in my back pocket but I'm planning on researching Assault Cannons next round and that is a very strong military tech to have which I'm sure you would make very good use of so the price for my pn has to be more than just your racial pn.. What more are you willing to throw in for the trade?

You still owe me 5 votes. I am happy to absolve you of that. In addition, what about a non-aggression treaty for a round and a half (active immediately until after next round?).
That would also exclude me from asking Tatts to open a wormhole in your systems.

Racial pn for racial pn I'm relieved of my 5 vote commitment and a round and a half non-aggression treaty.Deal.

[twelve]

Tapper 1 adendum. I will only execute the trade when I have 2 or fewer trade goods. For obvious reasos.

This post has been edited by twelve: 19 May 2018 - 07:52 PM

[Tapper]

OK. I am excluded from PDS fire on systems not ypur own, just to make Blend extremely nervous?

This post has been edited by Tapper: 19 May 2018 - 08:04 PM

[twelve]

Crap I forgot about pds fire. Well that falls into the non-agression portion of the deal so yes I guess it does exclude you for the remainder of this round and next.

[Itwæs Nom]

Which mf wants a war?

[Itwæs Nom]

Or how many

[Blend]

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 08:08 PM, said:

Crap I forgot about pds fire. Well that falls into the non-agression portion of the deal so yes I guess it does exclude you for the remainder of this round and next.

I will give you my trade agreement to not follow through with this deal.

[Gnaw]

Not quite yet my long absent Co-Consul.

[Itwæs Nom]

 Gnaw, on 19 May 2018 - 08:20 PM, said:

Not quite yet my long absent Co-Consul.

I think we've had enough of this pretense that any of these worms even touches the waists of our heights

[Itwæs Nom]

The worm who keeps tapping on his keyboard especially

[Itwæs Nom]

Tap tap tic tac

[twelve]

 Blend, on 19 May 2018 - 08:19 PM, said:

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 08:08 PM, said:

Crap I forgot about pds fire. Well that falls into the non-agression portion of the deal so yes I guess it does exclude you for the remainder of this round and next.

I will give you my trade agreement to not follow through with this deal.

I'm assuming once I'm able to cash in on the pn you will give it back... tapper I'm liking the counter offer better. 6 trade goods is huge.

[twelve]

And where the Fuck did Nico go? He knows it's his turn right?

[Gnaw]

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 07:39 PM, said:

Racial pn for racial pn I'm relieved of my 5 vote commitment and a round and a half non-aggression treaty.Deal.

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 08:53 PM, said:

 Blend, on 19 May 2018 - 08:19 PM, said:

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 08:08 PM, said:

Crap I forgot about pds fire. Well that falls into the non-agression portion of the deal so yes I guess it does exclude you for the remainder of this round and next.

I will give you my trade agreement to not follow through with this deal.

I'm assuming once I'm able to cash in on the pn you will give it back... tapper I'm liking the counter offer better. 6 trade goods is huge.

Hmmmm. So your word is flexible?

I see you made a deal. And now you want to back out on it?

This post has been edited by Gnaw: 19 May 2018 - 09:20 PM

[Tapper]

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 08:53 PM, said:

 Blend, on 19 May 2018 - 08:19 PM, said:

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 08:08 PM, said:

Crap I forgot about pds fire. Well that falls into the non-agression portion of the deal so yes I guess it does exclude you for the remainder of this round and next.

I will give you my trade agreement to not follow through with this deal.

I'm assuming once I'm able to cash in on the pn you will give it back... tapper I'm liking the counter offer better. 6 trade goods is huge.

6 trade goods to not go through with which part? The whole? A part? Is there a way you can cash on Blend and make a deal with me?
For example, what if you can still fire your PDS during 1.5 rounds?

[Tapper]

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 08:53 PM, said:

 Blend, on 19 May 2018 - 08:19 PM, said:

 twelve, on 19 May 2018 - 08:08 PM, said:

Crap I forgot about pds fire. Well that falls into the non-agression portion of the deal so yes I guess it does exclude you for the remainder of this round and next.

I will give you my trade agreement to not follow through with this deal.

I'm assuming once I'm able to cash in on the pn you will give it back... tapper I'm liking the counter offer better. 6 trade goods is huge.

As I said above, I am willing to make A deal that is not THIS deal.
On the other hand, if Blend feels buff enuff to attack IH, why should you allow him to influence deals by hiding under your skirts when there's a whiff of a threat from elsewhere?

[Itwæs Nom]

jk I love y'all

[Itwæs Nom]

I think nobody has ever reached the true end of this game

That is peacefully.forming a correctly-dcal3d senate to lead this galaxy

It's an end tho