[Tattersail_]

We're still on Nom/Mess aren't we? I think Hitler/Cause is waiting to see what some others may say.

[Nevyn]

[Macros]

I see 8pms. Will look at soon

[Cause]

Tattersail_, on 12 February 2018 - 04:05 PM, said:

We're still on Nom/Mess aren't we? I think Hitler/Cause is waiting to see what some others may say.

Voted hours ago. Macros can confirm if it is allowed.

Your coming on a bit strong for a man who is 50 to 100 percent fascist

[Tattersail_]

Hitler would have doubts wouldn't he.

[Macros]

in no particular order

Dol - Ja
D'rek - Ja
Cause - Ja
Venge - Ja
Nevyn - Ja
Messremb - Ja
Tatts - Ja
Nom Nom Nom - Ja (assumed)

Im assuming Ja for nom as he proposed the government and its a universal Ja anyway

pming Nom his 3 policies

[Vengeance]

Macros, on 12 February 2018 - 08:34 PM, said:

in no particular order

Dol - Ja
D'rek - Ja
Cause - Ja
Venge - Ja
Nevyn - Ja
Messremb - Ja
Tatts - Ja
Nom Nom Nom - Ja (assumed)

Im assuming Ja for nom as he proposed the government and its a universal Ja anyway

pming Nom his 3 policies

Nevyn didn't you say that you would only vote for a government that you were part of? Perhaps I am missing something here.

[Nevyn]

Vengeance, on 12 February 2018 - 08:47 PM, said:

Nevyn didn't you say that you would only vote for a government that you were part of? Perhaps I am missing something here.

I said that that is my default approach at the start of the game. As new information comes in (such as reusing players) that can obviously change.

In this particular case, I PM'ed Macros a Nein, then changed my mind and sent him a Ja.

The reason for the original Nein was first that Mess was my #3 choice of chancellor and you may have done a better one. But it is also a common tactic to reject even governments you think could be good to test how the suspected fascists will vote, and then act on that for the next nomination.

But in this case, I thought it over and decided that if fascists wanted this government to go, I could not stop them based on how voting has gone and lack of suspicion of these two. But if this was a good government, and I voted nein, then 3 fascists off the team could potentially stop it, which would have been a big problem particularly if you are fascist (as we would have had to take your government). So I voted Ja.

Really don't like to see a unanimous vote, but I suppose we can hope that the fascists were/are just afraid to give themselves away.

This post has been edited by Nevyn: 12 February 2018 - 08:59 PM

[Dolmen 2.0]

I agree with the last part and add that a unanimous vote yes might mean that we have it right and a cause, d’rek and or Tatts fascist corner may be more likely than not.

[Messremb]

Dolmen 2.0, on 12 February 2018 - 10:37 PM, said:

I agree with the last part and add that a unanimous vote yes might mean that we have it right and a cause, d’rek and or Tatts fascist corner may be more likely than not.

Alternatively, the fascists voted for me because I'm Hitler. WCS people, WCS.

Waiting on Itwas...

[Itwæs Nom]

Messremb, on 13 February 2018 - 01:33 AM, said:

Dolmen 2.0, on 12 February 2018 - 10:37 PM, said:

I agree with the last part and add that a unanimous vote yes might mean that we have it right and a cause, d’rek and or Tatts fascist corner may be more likely than not.

Alternatively, the fascists voted for me because I'm Hitler. WCS people, WCS.

Waiting on Itwas...

Just sent them in

[Itwæs Nom]

Oh and for the record the crash with a wall of snow that I mentioned earlier was not an accident, I actually wanted to like just lick it with the end of the car (on a suggestion of a friend) and I did exactly that I just didn't expect it to be frozen solid. It also felt like much bigger hit than this crash.

[D'rek]

Itwæs Nom, on 13 February 2018 - 02:10 AM, said:

Oh and for the record the crash with a wall of snow that I mentioned earlier was not an accident, I actually wanted to like just lick it with the end of the car (on a suggestion of a friend) and I did exactly that I just didn't expect it to be frozen solid. It also felt like much bigger hit than this crash.

THIS is who we're trusting?!

[Cause]

Dolmen 2.0, on 12 February 2018 - 10:37 PM, said:

I agree with the last part and add that a unanimous vote yes might mean that we have it right and a cause, d’rek and or Tatts fascist corner may be more likely than not.

Are you suggesting we are all fascists and our diabolical scheme was to vote in a liberal government?

[Tattersail_]

Itwæs Nom, on 13 February 2018 - 02:10 AM, said:

Oh and for the record the crash with a wall of snow that I mentioned earlier was not an accident, I actually wanted to like just lick it with the end of the car (on a suggestion of a friend) and I did exactly that I just didn't expect it to be frozen solid. It also felt like much bigger hit than this crash.

You shouldn't give in to peer pressure

[Dolmen 2.0]

Cause, on 13 February 2018 - 08:16 AM, said:

Dolmen 2.0, on 12 February 2018 - 10:37 PM, said:

I agree with the last part and add that a unanimous vote yes might mean that we have it right and a cause, d’rek and or Tatts fascist corner may be more likely than not.

Are you suggesting we are all fascists and our diabolical scheme was to vote in a liberal government?

Scheme? Are you inferring there's co-ordination between yourselves. Where do you get that word from? I did not offer it.

If your role is fascist you vote liberal to look liberal till you can pull a D'rek/Tatts. If you are Hitler you try not to make waves. Voting like a liberal when you have nothing to gain is a good way to do both these things.

As everyone has voted Ja this looks to be attempted atleast by one of you. It depends on the policy outcome.

[Cause]

what does WCS mean?

[Tattersail_]

Worst case scenario

[Macros]

We have a Liberal Policy enacted

[Macros]

President Venge, who is your chancellor?