Quote
Let's not pretend that the Seanchan aren't a bastardized, mixed-up-in-a-bowl Asian stereotype filtered into fantasy, up to and including their name.
Since the Seanchan are basically a hyper-exaggerated version of slave-owning Texans (even down to coming from the same continent, post-Breaking), I think it says more about the reader immediately assuming they're Asians than anything that Jordan put in the text
The actual Asian-influenced cultures are Shara (which doesn't seem to bear much actual resemblance to Asia any more) and the Borderland nations.
Quote
As I said earlier, the main problem with books 7-11 is structure. RJ was in bad health and had to cut back on his writing time, so he wasn't able to finish his book outlines.
I haven't heard that before. I know he had a health issue between LoC and ACoS, but that sounds like it was related to stress rather than anything more fundamental, and he did say that no symptoms of his amyloidosis surfaced until the KoD book tour in late 2005.
Quote
You talk a lot about "the fans"...but actual WOT fans would make up a tiny, tiny portion of the demographic a TV show would seek out in ratings world. And I'll be blunt...the people who bought this likely care VERY little about WOT fans. Hollywood man, it is what it is. Your "the series millions of fans fell in love with" is (though a large number) but a drop in the bucket for the amount of people this show has to court to stay solvent and popular.
WoT is one of the biggest-selling fantasy series ever written, which
ASoIaF was very definitely not when it was optioned. WoT has a much bigger pre-built-in audience, on a local and global level. The studio involved would be very foolish not to engage with the pre-existing fanbase as a way of drumming up excitement. HBO did that with
ASoIaF and even with that much smaller reader base were able to start building up levels of excitement and hype. Alienating that audience beforehand will not be a good idea.
On top of that,
GoT's global success is unprecedented and unlikely to be replicated. Unless it was on Netflix or maybe Amazon, the WoT TV series will likely have a smaller audience and that audience will proportionally consist of more book readers than otherwise.
Quote
Let's use SHANNARA as an example. The fans are largely either "meh" on the TV show, or they are outright bothered or angry about it as an adaptation. But casual TV viewers who never read the books and have no idea who Terry Brooks is? They seem to LOVE it as far as I can tell.
Really not so much. The best reviews damn it with faint praise, saying it's okay for kids or teenagers and that's about it. Its metacritic ratings are hovering around 50%, with the overwhelming majority of reviews saying it's mediocre. Mainly because it is. It's not a good show at all, and to be frank I'd be hard-pressed to say whether it was better or worse than
Legend of the Seeker.
Quote
EDIT to add: Serious query Terez, do you honestly think that Rand's harem flies with casual TV audiences in 2016? I can actually visualize the social media shitstorm that would wash across the internet right now.
It's 2016. Polyamorous relationships are a lot more common now and depicting one on TV is unusual, so could be seen as progressive depending on how it's handled. I don't see that being a problem in itself, but I do see a lot of eye-rolling at the relationship involving one guy and three hot women. It would have to be handled sensitively. Although it is worth noting that the show would be in its third or fourth season before it really got going in a big way, so it's not like it'll be a big issue upfront. Also, the "harem" descriptor needs to die a death, as it's quite inaccurate: Rand is with Aviendha as they come out of the Waste, then she leaves and he's with Min, and then he gets to spend like one night with Elayne. He's not with all three of them at the same time, and I think all four of them are in the same room (with other people) once in the entire series.
Quote
This cannot be true? Can it? I would argue that to disappear your primary antagonist for 80% of your third (and at one point final) book is not a literary smart move! Ther has to be a poll for this!
In twenty years of following the online WoT fandom, I've never once seen it come up as an issue. Rand has a chunk of story at the beggining and end, and pops up here and there in the middle. But cutting him out for chunks of story when he's not doing anything important and focusing more on Egwene, Elayne, Mat and Perrin (who'd not had a lot of development at that point, and Mat had spent all of Book 2 and half of Book 1 as a dagger-induced shadow of his normal self) seems to have been universally received well. It was cutting out Perrin and Mat altogether from later books that didn't go down well. TDR is very well-regarded across the board, it's the second-shortest book of the series (a few thousand words longer than PoD) but is by far the tightest, leanest and most economically-written. I think TSR is a better book overall, and LoC has the best ending (but is slow-going in the middle of the novel) but TDR is definitely up there.
The two books-per-season structure and the fact that TDR would cover less episodes (being a shorter book) means that Rand would really only be 100% missing from maybe 2 episodes of the season, which isn't too bad at all. In fact, I'd be very keen to have a new, stand-alone and focused episode showing the journey from Rand's POV as I think he underwent some interesting character growth during that solo journey and meeting ordinary people that could be worthwhile to put on screen. But only if it was possible from a time point of view.
Quote
no element should be put into a narrative unless its necessary and irreplaceable. Characters, plotlines and prophecies all fail this test in Jordan's books.
And they do in Erikson's, and Martin's, and Bakker's, and Tolkien's, and Rowling's. The MBF would be two 500 books long if that was the case. The divergences, side-stories, tertiary characters and worldbuilding are what make epic fantasy epic fantasy. Without them, what's the point? Yes, it actually makes it easier to adapt in some ways (Jackson pulled out Bombadil and the Scouring of the Shire and it didn't really do much to the structure of the story, even if it thematically weakened the story versus that in the novel), but at some point your "helpful" editing inadvertently cuts out the soul of the story.
I think you can handle the Shaido differently. I always wondered if Jordan envisaged them changing sides and playing a role at the Last Battle, but in KoD decided he couldn't find a way of doing that convincingly so just had them leave. They are definitely prune-worthy, and you can't have Faile being a prisoner for two full seasons of a TV show, but I think you also need them to show that Rand taking command of the Aiel is controversial, and not everyone will follow him automatically.
This post has been edited by Werthead: 13 May 2016 - 10:23 AM