Rashan, on 31 July 2013 - 04:29 PM, said:
best candidate after Alkend. I will dig up the post that made me suspicious towards him.
Tellan's immediate response:
Tellan, on 31 July 2013 - 04:35 PM, said:
Vote Barghast
I respond, and call out Rash on a bullshit case:
Barghast, on 31 July 2013 - 04:43 PM, said:
for those interested, posts 138 and 139
Tellan immideatelty backs up.
Tellan, on 31 July 2013 - 04:48 PM, said:
Tellan, on 31 July 2013 - 04:49 PM, said:
I throw out Cast. Tellan says:
Tellan, on 31 July 2013 - 05:38 PM, said:
Remove Vote,
Vote Cast
Then Cast is lynched.
Next we hear of Tellan is much later:
Tellan, on 01 August 2013 - 02:04 PM, said:
Kalse, on 01 August 2013 - 12:31 PM, said:
Okaros, on 01 August 2013 - 03:30 AM, said:
Alkend, on 31 July 2013 - 04:00 PM, said:
I'm Goro, of the Miura clan.
My ability allows certain members of the two town factions to communicate, under very specific circumstances.
Happy now?
So, under pressure on day 2 Alkend reveals a role that it seems cannot give us any useful information through his reveal other than to PI him. It's not as bad as a Healer revealing, but it's fairly close. Why reveal? Just to save your skin? But since you emphasize that it is only under "very specific circumstances" you are implying that it is a weak role. Generally, it is not useful to reveal due to pressure when your reveal and role can't provide any info to town like a Finder can. All it does is identify for scum a roled town. It's generally better not to give scum that information they don't have and keep them more in the dark about the town setup and who is left.
This game is supposed to be low TMDI, so all of those principles still apply.
But instead Alkend felt that revealing his weak role to save his skin is more beneficial for town than keeping quiet. I have two problems with believing this idea:
1. If the reveal helps us, why not reveal fully? Tell us what the "very specific circumstances" are. If you've already revealed as roled town, what's the harm in giving town more information (which ultimately is always what town lacks and needs to win) instead of being coy about it? The scum will try and remove you whether they know the details or whether they just know you are roled town. But you had all day and didn't do so. (And before you make some "I didn't want to get modkilled" defence, a simple read of the OP indicates that revealing your abilities is allowed as long as you change the wording, which should not be difficult, so that is no excuse)
2.
Alkend, on 31 July 2013 - 04:51 PM, said:
Alkend then discourages his supposed lover from publicly confirming his reveal. Why? He's already revealing to save his skin so clearly Alkend thinks he is important to town. Why be only a PI and not get yourself a VPI or CI? Especially since with no kill last night there's a high chance of a healer - if the healer is convinced you are CI they won't be doubting themselves from healing you every night. Furthermore, whomever is the lover and speaks up to confirm the reveal is not in any more danger because since Alkend has not revealed any mechanics of his ability the person he turns into a lover could just as easily be roled town, RI, or even scum. That person does not need to reveal anything about themselves, just say "I am Alkend's current lover as of last night and what he says is true" and nothing more, which doesn't reveal anything about themselves but does give town more information to work with.
So if Alkend actively believes his revealing is worth it to town, and if there's no harm in someone else confirming it to assuage our doubts, why is he discouraging that from happening?!
So yeah, I have a very hard time believing that Alkend's intentions here match what a player who wants town to win would be doing.
Oh, and also, I can't find any Goros who were affiliated with the Miura clan. But if you were hurriedly doing a google search for a plausible Miura name to fake reveal as, one of the top results might be Miura Goro, which sounds good as long as you don't read too much about him and realize that he is born in the wrong century to be a Sengoku samurai...
I am agreeable with Okaros here. I don't actually think to believe the reveal and Alkend being around is going to cloud the thread further on. I don't want to get into a situation where we are at D day with Alkend still alive
I feel like the situation won't take care of itself, so we need to do something about it. His presence will cloud the thread, and there'll always be someone who jumps to an Alkend vote in opposition to other cases. The two ways we cand deal with it is lynch him, or hope he gets NK'd. A clouded thread is good for scum, so I wouldn't count on the NK, so that just leaves lynching him. Its still early, so I don't want to drop my vote yet, but he's topping my list unless a good case is made on someone else where the evidence is really convincing
note how he doesn't want to vote "just yet"
He then does the most proactive thing he did all game--makes his one and only case.
Tellan, on 02 August 2013 - 02:55 AM, said:
Tellan, on 02 August 2013 - 04:19 AM, said:
He mentions recruiting, which gets promptly shot down and causes the conflict between him and Lio.
He OMGUS votes Lio for Introducing WIFOM on thread after lio votes him for the recruitment comment.
He has a snarky to Lio
He leaves his vote on for a while, but the removes it, and goes on to vote Desra a bit later.
He says he sees merit in an Alkend lynch, but doesn't vote, instead asking for other options. Noncommital
He's gone for a while, but returns in time to drop a drive by vote on Cast
When he gets back, he agrees with Okaros, and proceeds to actually vote Alkend, but calls Rashan suspicious.
He reiterates his alkend suspicions, but backs off after Alkend's response to him.
I'm noticing a pattern here. He sets up a main target and looks for or finds a backup(i.e. Alkend/Rashan, Alkend/looking for another target), staying relatively noncommital votewise. He seems to have tried to go under the radar after the Lio spat. This could be scum trying to not be noticed after the Lio stuff and subsequent NK of Lio, which may have been him trying to take out someone who went after him, but NK analysis does not a good case make. In all honesty, D'riss has acted scummily this game, but not (imo) egregiously so. That actually makes someone seems scummier to me, because scum would be aware of what is scummy, and try to avoid it. His playstyle is scummy enough to be noticeable, but not so much so as to convince me that no sane scum would play that way, and make him less suspicious. There's not enough evidence there to convince me thoroughly as to him being scum, but I know for sure I'll at least keep an eye on him.
What struck me about this much later was the fact that he didn't actually vote on it. He just kind of... threw it out there.
Barghast, on 02 August 2013 - 04:33 AM, said:
Tellan, on 02 August 2013 - 04:19 AM, said:
He mentions recruiting, which gets promptly shot down and causes the conflict between him and Lio.
He OMGUS votes Lio for Introducing WIFOM on thread after lio votes him for the recruitment comment.
He has a snarky to Lio
He leaves his vote on for a while, but the removes it, and goes on to vote Desra a bit later.
He says he sees merit in an Alkend lynch, but doesn't vote, instead asking for other options. Noncommital
He's gone for a while, but returns in time to drop a drive by vote on Cast
When he gets back, he agrees with Okaros, and proceeds to actually vote Alkend, but calls Rashan suspicious.
He reiterates his alkend suspicions, but backs off after Alkend's response to him.
I'm noticing a pattern here. He sets up a main target and looks for or finds a backup(i.e. Alkend/Rashan, Alkend/looking for another target), staying relatively noncommital votewise. He seems to have tried to go under the radar after the Lio spat. This could be scum trying to not be noticed after the Lio stuff and subsequent NK of Lio, which may have been him trying to take out someone who went after him, but NK analysis does not a good case make. In all honesty, D'riss has acted scummily this game, but not (imo) egregiously so. That actually makes someone seems scummier to me, because scum would be aware of what is scummy, and try to avoid it. His playstyle is scummy enough to be noticeable, but not so much so as to convince me that no sane scum would play that way, and make him less suspicious. There's not enough evidence there to convince me thoroughly as to him being scum, but I know for sure I'll at least keep an eye on him.
quotes would be nice, but beggars can't be choosers.
I'll
vote D'riss
b/c I have a strong feeling people are barking up the wrong tree with Rash. so I want to leave some options on the table, in case I don't wake up in time for the timeout.
g'night, y'all
Path-Shaper, on 02 August 2013 - 05:30 AM, said:
16 Players still alive: Alkend, Anthras, Barghast, D'riss, Eloth, Gait, Galain, Hanas, Jalan, Kalse, Korbas, Mockra, Okaros, Rashan, Tellan, Trake
9 votes to lynch, 8 votes to go to night.
1 Vote for D'riss ( Barghast )
1 Vote for Jalan ( Eloth )
3 Votes for Rashan ( Gait, Trake, Alkend )
2 Votes for Alkend ( Mockra, Okaros )
Players not voted: Anthras, D'riss, Galain, Hanas, Jalan, Kalse, Korbas, Rashan, Tellan
Path-Shaper, on 02 August 2013 - 11:52 AM, said:
It is Day 3. 33 minutes since time out
16 Players still alive: Alkend, Anthras, Barghast, D'riss, Eloth, Gait, Galain, Hanas, Jalan, Kalse, Korbas, Mockra, Okaros, Rashan, Tellan, Trake
9 votes to lynch, 8 votes to go to night.
6 Votes for D'riss ( Barghast, Trake, Kalse, Galain, Korbas, Jalan )
2 Votes for Rashan ( Gait, Alkend, )
1 Vote for Jalan ( Eloth )
2 Votes for Alkend ( Mockra, Okaros )
Players not voted: Anthras, D'riss, Hanas, Rashan, Tellan
Tellan, on 02 August 2013 - 12:18 PM, said:
Vote D'riss
Tellan votes towards the end of the train--that place where any vote can be explained away by the "well, we needed a lynch" sentiment.
to be continued..