[Tattersail_]

Lady Bliss, on 23 January 2013 - 04:07 PM, said:

Tattersail, on 23 January 2013 - 03:59 PM, said:

If more people want to vote Sixty then I could go that way looking back. If you see no merit in what I am suggesting. I'll vote before I got to bed tonight and then see what happened in the morning as i'll miss day end.

I think Blend saw Dude as his Symp NOT a finder. If HO was Blends partner, and Dude's reveal was real, then I think that Blend would have wanted a finder OUT of the game. Instead, Blend kept going after you Tatts, as did Sixty.

Oh yeah, the way Sixty kept on going without picking up on what the Dude was saying

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 4. 10 hours and 52 minutes remaining
8 Players still alive: Bonecaster, Hiddenone, Hinter, Lady Bliss, Silencer, Sixty, Tapper, Tattersail

5 votes to lynch, 4 votes to go to night.

2 Votes for Hiddenone ( Silencer, Tattersail )
1 Vote for Sixty ( Lady Bliss )

Players not voted: Bonecaster, Hiddenone, Hinter, Sixty, Tapper

[Sixty]

I'm back and pretty much caught up.

Why am I being voted now? Because you guys think I'm Blend's partner? Wouldn't that make the Dude my symp? I didn't trust his soft reveal, since it put is in a horrible situation. I viewed it as an attempt to deflect from Blend or Tatts, and I was more suspicious of Tatts than Blend from day one. Like I've said multiple times, but you have clearly ignored that part.

I left my vote on Tatts because I Thought that we'd be better off lynching the master than the symp. My vote never moved because I wasn't around when everyone speed-swapped to the Dude halfway through weekend break.

[Tattersail_]

I'll be back in 2 hours.

[Silencer]

Back and caught up. Nice to see everyone pitching in (can you tell it's getting exciting? XD) again.

In light of that and Tapper's timely reminder that second-guessing mod decisions is just WIFOM, I will for the moment,

Remove Vote

And see what else is on the table.

[Bonecaster]

Looking back, I don't see that Hinter removed his vote for Silencer. Am I just not seeing it?

[Hinter]

Back after the best day's sleep I've had in months.

Having had a quick read up I am willing to admit I may have been a little over zealous on Boney's reveal. Blame it on exhaustion and more than a couple of ciders - whatever. For the moment I will

remove vote


even though PS seems to be ignoring the fact that I had voted for Silencer.

However, I must re-iterate the fact that as far as I am concerned four is an important number in this game. Once again I will direct you to the sign up thread - Bubba wanted twelve people in the game. If oversubscribed he said he could bump it to sixteen players. Not fourteen, or thirteen or fifteen, it had to be twelve or sixteen players. I mentioned it on day one and have done so several times since, but people seem to be wilfully ignoring it..

I do not subscribe to Blend's theory that we are four factions of scum because I know with absolute certainty there is at least one player in this game who is not scum. I have said on thread before though that a team of four scum would not be unfair in a game with no CF.

Meh - my thoughts after a quick catch up. I'll be here for at least the next six hours or so, probably longer, so we shall see what we shall see.

[Hinter]

Tapper, on 23 January 2013 - 03:29 PM, said:

...snip...

(there is a catch there: suppose we should all reveal we were the guy who killed Gnaw - the real killers will be mod-killed for revealing their role, hmm?)

...snip...

Kind of like this idea, although completely against the spirit of the game. Unfortunately as a passionate cricketer, a game in which sportsmanship is king (are you listening Australia?) I could not possibly condone it

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 4. 8 hours and 39 minutes remaining
8 Players still alive: Bonecaster, Hiddenone, Hinter, Lady Bliss, Silencer, Sixty, Tapper, Tattersail

5 votes to lynch, 4 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Sixty ( Lady Bliss )

Players not voted: Bonecaster, Hiddenone, Hinter, Silencer, Sixty, Tapper, Tattersail



Mod going away. Yada Yada Suck it.

[Path-Shaper]

Hinter, on 23 January 2013 - 10:23 PM, said:

Tapper, on 23 January 2013 - 03:29 PM, said:

...snip...

(there is a catch there: suppose we should all reveal we were the guy who killed Gnaw - the real killers will be mod-killed for revealing their role, hmm?)

...snip...

Kind of like this idea, although completely against the spirit of the game. Unfortunately as a passionate cricketer, a game in which sportsmanship is king (are you listening Australia?) I could not possibly condone it

FYI


If me or any Mod Sniff any type of reveals that person or persons will be immediately modkilled and depending on how pissed Bubba will be other sanctions might follow.

[Path-Shaper]

Hinter, on 23 January 2013 - 09:44 PM, said:

even though PS seems to be ignoring the fact that I had voted for Silencer.

It was not intentional. Busy at work.

[Hinter]

Bonecaster, on 23 January 2013 - 09:18 PM, said:

Looking back, I don't see that Hinter removed his vote for Silencer. Am I just not seeing it?

I hadn't, I have now temporarily, nice to see you are looking out for your master though.



Edited to remove faulty emoticon.

This post has been edited by Hinter: 23 January 2013 - 10:38 PM

[Hinter]

Path-Shaper, on 23 January 2013 - 10:27 PM, said:

Hinter, on 23 January 2013 - 10:23 PM, said:

Tapper, on 23 January 2013 - 03:29 PM, said:

...snip...

(there is a catch there: suppose we should all reveal we were the guy who killed Gnaw - the real killers will be mod-killed for revealing their role, hmm?)

...snip...

Kind of like this idea, although completely against the spirit of the game. Unfortunately as a passionate cricketer, a game in which sportsmanship is king (are you listening Australia?) I could not possibly condone it

FYI


If me or any Mod Sniff any type of reveals that person or persons will be immediately modkilled and depending on how pissed Bubba will be other sanctions might follow.

Erm, I was joking, hence silly emoticon.

[Tattersail_]

So that's all you left me with in 2 hours when I'll be going to bed soon. Fuckz!

For me my points in the past are based on bcs and Wcs.

Bcs we lynch either Silencer Sixty or Tapper for Blends partner. Nothing major makes one stand out.

WCs we lynch HO as hiding in plain site scum.

No one up thread except Bliss has laid out anything remotely convincing if who they want to lynch and why.

For some unknown reason I see Silencer and Sixty as chums. In my opinion one of th is scum and the other Is being fed sweetness and delight.

For not voting for Blend day one, for ignoring the Dude start of day two. For then wanting me instead of Blend afterwards. For the distance vote day three I'm going to

vote sixty

[Bonecaster]

Hinter, on 23 January 2013 - 10:37 PM, said:

Bonecaster, on 23 January 2013 - 09:18 PM, said:

Looking back, I don't see that Hinter removed his vote for Silencer. Am I just not seeing it?

I hadn't, I have now temporarily, nice to see you are looking out for your master though.

I was looking out for you. Making sure your vote was counted.


If I hadn't pointed it out, would it have been because I was hoping everybody forgot about the vote against Silencer?


Oh my, this is so clever!

[Silencer]

Tattersail, on 23 January 2013 - 10:44 PM, said:

So that's all you left me with in 2 hours when I'll be going to bed soon. Fuckz!

For me my points in the past are based on bcs and Wcs.

Bcs we lynch either Silencer Sixty or Tapper for Blends partner. Nothing major makes one stand out.

WCs we lynch HO as hiding in plain site scum.

No one up thread except Bliss has laid out anything remotely convincing if who they want to lynch and why.

For some unknown reason I see Silencer and Sixty as chums. In my opinion one of th is scum and the other Is being fed sweetness and delight.

For not voting for Blend day one, for ignoring the Dude start of day two. For then wanting me instead of Blend afterwards. For the distance vote day three I'm going to

vote sixty

Let me summarize: "For not agreeing with me".

That's literally your case here. On me, Tapper AND on Sixty. Oh, what's that, you see Sixty and I as chums? Is that because we're both disagreeing with Hinter's reading of Bonecaster's post? (Which Hinter himself has now partially retracted.) Well, fuck me sideways.
And yeah, "For not voting Blend on day one" - uhm, wow. Staggeringly convincing. Sure, we SHOULD have lynched day one - and this is why, this stupid shit comes back to us on day friggin' four, though granted it's your fault and you were also a prime candidate on day one, iirc - but that's hardly a unique condition.
For ignoring the Dude start of day two? EVERYONE DID. Everyone except Bliss, and then me. And moreover, what of it?
And for wanting you instead of Blend afterwards...I hope that's a fucking joke. I swear that is probably the scummiest self-promoting utterance I've seen all game.
And for the distance vote. Ah yes, the distance vote. As opposed to me, who is scummy for not voting.

MY GOD. THE LOGICZ. I swear there are a half-dozen Jesters in this fucking game and you are all trying your damndest to play worse than the next person down the chain.


That being said I've still got you pegged as more inno than the rest of the thread. I'm burning through my assignment, so hopefully I'll be able to do a bit more serious read-up in the next couple of hours. That'll be fun. Not.

[Hinter]

Bonecaster, on 23 January 2013 - 10:49 PM, said:

Hinter, on 23 January 2013 - 10:37 PM, said:

Bonecaster, on 23 January 2013 - 09:18 PM, said:

Looking back, I don't see that Hinter removed his vote for Silencer. Am I just not seeing it?

I hadn't, I have now temporarily, nice to see you are looking out for your master though.

I was looking out for you. Making sure your vote was counted.


If I hadn't pointed it out, would it have been because I was hoping everybody forgot about the vote against Silencer?


Oh my, this is so clever!

They use a box of tricks called Mafia Manager. Prevents fuck ups. Apparently.

[Silencer]

Hinter, on 23 January 2013 - 09:44 PM, said:

Back after the best day's sleep I've had in months.

Having had a quick read up I am willing to admit I may have been a little over zealous on Boney's reveal. Blame it on exhaustion and more than a couple of ciders - whatever. For the moment I will

remove vote


even though PS seems to be ignoring the fact that I had voted for Silencer.

However, I must re-iterate the fact that as far as I am concerned four is an important number in this game. Once again I will direct you to the sign up thread - Bubba wanted twelve people in the game. If oversubscribed he said he could bump it to sixteen players. Not fourteen, or thirteen or fifteen, it had to be twelve or sixteen players. I mentioned it on day one and have done so several times since, but people seem to be wilfully ignoring it..

I do not subscribe to Blend's theory that we are four factions of scum because I know with absolute certainty there is at least one player in this game who is not scum. I have said on thread before though that a team of four scum would not be unfair in a game with no CF.

Meh - my thoughts after a quick catch up. I'll be here for at least the next six hours or so, probably longer, so we shall see what we shall see.

Glad to see you actually playing now.

I fail to see how no CF makes it MORE fair to have four scum instead of the standard three. That makes it harder for us - as is apparent - by increasing the uncertainty. Throw on top of that no reveals (thus Finders have a harder job, if present), and I mean...we could have lost today. If we didn't get lucky and hit scum, it's game over by now. That seems excessive, to me. And bumping up to 16 players is just a nice increment. Granted it may have to do with the "hidden mechanic" Bubba mentioned, as much as the fundamental game setup.

But presume the for the minute that there are four scum in the game - this still doesn't tally with your chain of scum that ends with me as "the fourth man" - are we to chalk that up to cider as well?

[Tattersail_]

What a major over reaction from Silencer.

All that was about Sixty. They were the reasons I chose him. Nothing to do with you.

The reasons I fingered you as scummy was in our early interactions today. Wow. Touch a nerve voting for Sixty or what?

[Bonecaster]

Hinter's chain started with Blend and me. Because it's easier to believe that someone who 1) has absolutely no experience at Mafia, 2) never so much as heard of Mafia two days before this current game started, and 3) has possibly not interacted with any of you in any of the book forums, was trying to pull the ol' double/triple/quadruple cross than it is to believe he was joking around.