Malazan Empire: Tales of the Desert 0.66: The Election of the Defterdar - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 39 Pages +
  • « First
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Tales of the Desert 0.66: The Election of the Defterdar game thread

#621 User is offline   Atrahal 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:42 PM

View PostKorabas, on 17 April 2012 - 07:40 PM, said:

To me the thread is secondary to the Bazaar and fufilling your winning conditions behind the scene. So by all means continue to bitch and moan about non participation, just because people aren't posting on thread doesn't mean they arent playing the game. It seems speculating anything on thread just gets you the hoary eye of atrahal. I think Alkend might agree with me on there.


In my eyes this is the worst possible approach to the game and it depresses me how obviously so many other players seem to agree with it.

#622 User is offline   Korabas 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 19-October 10

Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:43 PM

View PostAtrahal, on 17 April 2012 - 07:32 PM, said:

View PostKorabas, on 17 April 2012 - 07:05 PM, said:

So the case on Alkend is that he is probably of a Special faction and thus people don't mind voting for him because he isn't on their team?

remove vote

because it's going nowhere

I have done my best to catch up. But, this close to lynch I would really appreciate a synopsis on why Alkend seems to be going down.


Case in point. Read and weep.


I was stating what I thought your case was. Not my own views. Notice the question mark? I am asking a question. I am asking if your case is that he is on a special faction, and because of this belief people have been willing to pile on because he (Alkend) isn't on their team. So while I may weep and use my oh so viscious tears for lubrication during an intense masturbatory session, it won't be because of a point that you have made.

#623 User is offline   Korabas 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 19-October 10

Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:45 PM

View PostAtrahal, on 17 April 2012 - 07:42 PM, said:

View PostKorabas, on 17 April 2012 - 07:40 PM, said:

To me the thread is secondary to the Bazaar and fufilling your winning conditions behind the scene. So by all means continue to bitch and moan about non participation, just because people aren't posting on thread doesn't mean they arent playing the game. It seems speculating anything on thread just gets you the hoary eye of atrahal. I think Alkend might agree with me on there.


In my eyes this is the worst possible approach to the game and it depresses me how obviously so many other players seem to agree with it.



Worst approach why? Because you have fewer and fewer people to badger and make trumped up "cases" on?

#624 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:45 PM

It is Day 3. 46 minutes remaining

12 Players still alive: Alkend, Anthras, Atrahal, Barghast, Galayn Lord, Kessobahn, Korabas, Korlat, Merrid, Okaros, Omtose, Tiamatha

7 votes to lynch, 6 votes to go to night.

4 Votes for Alkend ( Atrahal, Anthras, Galayn Lord, Korlat )

Players not voted: Alkend, Barghast, Kessobahn, Korabas, Merrid, Okaros, Omtose, Tiamatha
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#625 User is offline   Alkend 

  • Lieutenant
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 110
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:50 PM

View PostKorabas, on 17 April 2012 - 07:40 PM, said:

To me the thread is secondary to the Bazaar and fufilling your winning conditions behind the scene. So by all means continue to bitch and moan about non participation, just because people aren't posting on thread doesn't mean they arent playing the game. It seems speculating anything on thread just gets you the hoary eye of atrahal. I think Alkend might agree with me on there.


Not gunna lie, I don't disagree :(

Not really condusive to getting people talk, swarming all over them when they finally get a chance.

#626 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:54 PM

Well people, I'm off for 20-30 minutes to watch the Bayern-Madrid game... exciting stuff there so far. Will check here every 10 min or so.
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#627 User is offline   Atrahal 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:02 PM

View PostKorabas, on 17 April 2012 - 07:45 PM, said:

View PostAtrahal, on 17 April 2012 - 07:42 PM, said:

View PostKorabas, on 17 April 2012 - 07:40 PM, said:

To me the thread is secondary to the Bazaar and fufilling your winning conditions behind the scene. So by all means continue to bitch and moan about non participation, just because people aren't posting on thread doesn't mean they arent playing the game. It seems speculating anything on thread just gets you the hoary eye of atrahal. I think Alkend might agree with me on there.


In my eyes this is the worst possible approach to the game and it depresses me how obviously so many other players seem to agree with it.



Worst approach why? Because you have fewer and fewer people to badger and make trumped up "cases" on?


No, because I believe that on-thread discussion is key to winning this game, especially for certain factions. But instead we have this unfortunate opposite effect of last game. Last game, the Bazaar was not used much and actions + thread were the focus of the game. This game, the Bazaar + actions are the focus. So why bother posting at all? We might as well not bother having a thread, we can all just sit in our little homes and build stuff. Oh wait, you should be playing Minecraft and not Mafia.

#628 User is offline   Atrahal 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:04 PM

View PostAlkend, on 17 April 2012 - 07:50 PM, said:

View PostKorabas, on 17 April 2012 - 07:40 PM, said:

To me the thread is secondary to the Bazaar and fufilling your winning conditions behind the scene. So by all means continue to bitch and moan about non participation, just because people aren't posting on thread doesn't mean they arent playing the game. It seems speculating anything on thread just gets you the hoary eye of atrahal. I think Alkend might agree with me on there.


Not gunna lie, I don't disagree :(

Not really condusive to getting people talk, swarming all over them when they finally get a chance.


Whatever, this is the dumbest shit of all time. If you want to call it swarming, I'm swarming those who HAVEN'T been talking. Stop being a bitch and complaining that someone is "bothering" you when you post.

#629 User is offline   Alkend 

  • Lieutenant
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 110
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:07 PM

I love it when you spaz out :(

#630 User is offline   Anthras 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:11 PM

I'm with Atrah here.

IF the low posters are HoA, they don't deserve to win. Just as we consider scum victories from people who post so little its impossible to find them unworthy.

I don;t think it's bad for the game. This is here to test the market. Just don't think its in the spirit, ya know?

#631 User is offline   Kessobahn 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 23-November 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:18 PM

I'm around, how long do we have left?

#632 User is offline   Anthras 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:18 PM

somewhere around 20 minutes.

#633 User is offline   Kessobahn 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 23-November 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:21 PM

We discussed the lynching day one and two and people said they'd prefer not to lynch. I was and still am on the fence, this is the first game i've seen that people want to rely on night actions and the bazaar to win the game. I said I liked Atrahal's case and I'm willing to vote Alkend. In fact, if we only have that amount of time left I may as well vote now

Vote Alkend

#634 User is offline   Omtose 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:21 PM

I'm back, just gonna read up. Sorry, meant to be back much earlier but got engrossed in the football. We've got a bit over an hour left, right?

#635 User is offline   Anthras 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:22 PM

20 minutes.

#636 User is offline   Anthras 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:22 PM

or less.

#637 User is offline   Barghast 

  • Fist
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 258
  • Joined: 01-October 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:26 PM

View PostPath-Shaper, on 17 April 2012 - 07:54 PM, said:

Well people, I'm off for 20-30 minutes to watch the Bayern-Madrid game... exciting stuff there so far. Will check here every 10 min or so.


Bayern's playing? I don't really follow soccer, but when I do im rooting for bayern munchen/munich.
I was at a lax game right after classes so I had very little time to post. From what I see, and correct me if I am wrong, Atrahal wants Alkend gone, and is spazzing about low posting, which is supported by anthras. Alkends argument against the lynch is pretty much, "you are only saying im in a mystery faction so you don't let your faction slip out, which, though it makes sense, still is not substantial enough to stop his lynch unless low posting lets day time out.
My opinion on all of this, some of which is above, is that Atrahal is pretty sure of Alkend's faction, and wants it weakened. I'd rather not vote Alkend as lynching, though it gives information, is not really worth it for a case only supported by 4 people seriosly as it is more likely to hurt the alliance than the HoA by taking someone potentially near a courtly title for alliance out of the game

#638 User is offline   Omtose 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:28 PM

Well, below is Alkend's response to Atrahal's case - and whilst I was one of the ones who said that Atrahal's post on Alkend, right or wrong, was a very good, thought-provoking post, I have to admit that Alkend's response is pretty reasonable.

Certainly has more substance than Atrahal will admit, and I actually think Atrahal is being a bit obstinate when it comes listening to Alkend. Though that's not so surprising, as he clearly want this lynch.


View PostAlkend, on 15 April 2012 - 11:23 AM, said:

View PostAtrahal, on 15 April 2012 - 06:44 AM, said:

Ok, I decided it was important to go back and read the names, and I discovered...well, a lot.

View PostAlkend, on 15 April 2012 - 03:40 AM, said:

I read that as more that the Dreadfather has the potential to wreak havock on the thieves but is currently allied with them. Which isn't to say that the allience will be permanant through the game. Would make sense since there's another role out there, I'd guess they'd be semi-allied with the Houses of Agreement as well.

Also, if you take a look at the bazaar you'll see that the Riddle of Despair has been marked at how much it's been used, which is all the actions except the last.


Well, this is an interesting post. Why do you think the alliance with the Thieves (and by some extent, also the entire Beggars/Vultures/Nepeth "side") would be temporary? All it actually says about him in relation to alliances and Thieves is this: "It will chafe on him that his allies are the Thieves he usually hunts." This already sounds permanent - the contrast between "his allies are the Thieves he usually hunts." Now, if we're talking in the context of actions taken by players in this game (which we are, not only because the only other paragraph dealt with the death of a Roled player, but, well, be patient), this can't be just idle background but actual actions. "Usually" leads me to believe he been using his actions on the Thieves - capital T, the "house" in the Guild of Beggars - most of the time so far. Now, what actions could those be? Obviously they're negative - the scene says it will "chafe" him and later describes their alliance as "It is like a hunting cat teamed with hares: a recipe for disaster." This sounds like he could probably destroy any of the the Thieves easily and if the cat eats all the hares, well, let's just say the Guild of Beggars would probably be hurting. "Are" implies nothing but simple fact, not possible change or any equivocation of who his allies are.

Oh yes, I forgot to explain who "he" is. The Dreadfather is actually "Mage Hassan the Dreadfather" of the House of Terror - which just so happens to be part of the Cult of Vultures faction. It even slipped by me but he's referenced as a member of the Cult in this scene. So, we know their alliance isn't temporary - the OP clearly states that the Vultures, Nepeth, and Beggars were clearly allied together and all against the House of Agreements - two sides like we've been saying.

And then Alkend says this "Would make sense since there's another role out there, I'd guess they'd be semi-allied with the Houses of Agreement as well." Wait, what? "Another role?" Why would he assume there's just two mystery roles in the game? Also...the OP states:

"Mystery factions have their victory conditions in a seperate PM. Mystery factions can be on either side of the equation."


If you're playing this game at all or know about the previous one, it's obvious that probably every player is Roled from the master list (minus the ones who died last game, of course) and Roles are very, very different than Factions. Each Faction usually has a good number of roles - many around 15 Roles or so - so it's very clear that most of the players in this game will belong to one of the four main factions listed in the OP.

More evidence:

"Nevertheless, the tight discipline that is Hassan's one rescue line hasn't yet snapped."

The list of players actually says that Mage Hassan is the Dreadfather. And line also implies something else, like Hassan (who must be somehow in charge or highly involved with the Thieves) has an ability or item or condition that is holding his little group together. And maybe it's totally unrelated to the Thieves, I have no idea; it could be some other condition for the Cult of Vutures.

On a separate but related note, from the OP:

"In the days to come, he [Huassan ibn Qolat, of the House of Luxury, of the House of Agreements, the current Defterdar] and his supporters would seek to outwit the grand alliance opposing him through legal and illegal means, and they [Vultures/Beggars/Nepeth] would seek to do the same to him. He would have the vastness of his resources and connections and, very importantly, the initiative, they would have numbers and the opportunity they craved.:"

Ok...so we are getting numbers information here. The House of Agreements appears to be up against a "grand alliance", and his opponents (Vultures/Beggars/Nepeth) have the advantage of numbers (obvious) and opportunity (not sure what this could be, but it has to increase their "opportunity" to elect the next Defterdar, as they have already been trying to hold new elections, which prompted ibn Qolat's request to be Defterdar and solely in charge, with no Council, which is the act that catalyzed this game and the circumstances of its factions). The HoA, on the other hand, probably have boadloads of cash and/or goods (hence the title purchases) and "connections", which almost implies off thread communications.

That's a lot of info. And I do this to say, Alkend, how could you make so many obvious mistakes? Referring to and assuming the Dreadfather was "a mystery role" and was probably allied with the HoA as well, just like the "other role"? Either he's had contact with the Dreadfather and didn't realize he was a Cult member (or maybe he just never bothered to look up the name), or he's actually got knowledge of this supposed "other role", which is "probably also allied with the House of Alliances." There is just too much info here that has to come from somewhere else.

And even though he could be aligned with either faction and be able to make the post above, my real suspicion is that he assumed the Dreadfather was a "mystery role" like he was and misspoke when he implied there were only two of their kind. If he's somehow allied with both "sides", that would make a lot of sense too, or if he was able to switch his allegiance. In the last game we had single-Role Faction members whose VCs were very much out of their hands; for instance, they aligned with the Faction of the first player that died. Not much of a choice. Also, he would probably be more likely to slip up and talk about "mystery roles" if he was the one person from a mystery faction. Seems like he is or could be aligned with either faction if he chose to, though, unlike the previous game. You wouldn't assume something like that had changed...unless you had good reason.

So Alkend, you did disappear, you have low-posted, and I accuse you of making massive slipups that reveal you know more than a lot of people and should be considered extremely dangerous as a "mystery" element.

I can't remember what the rules are for the weekend, but

Vote Alkend

If that needs to be redone on Monday to be valid, then this was just for emphasis.

edit - added the word "goods"


/sigh. I don't really want to repost your whole long post, but it's probably easier if I do.

It "even" slipped by you, and it obviously slipped by me that he was the Cult. So there we go. I thought the post indicated that he was allied with the Thieves, and the reason I think it's not neccessary permanant in the game is the line
"Nevertheless, the tight discipline that is Hassan's one rescue line hasn't yet snapped." I figure that's a fairly obvious indication that the alliance can be dissolved, though I have no idea what exactly would lead to that. Because I missed that Hassan is a member of the Cult of Vultures, I thought of PS post at the end of Day 1:

View PostPath-Shaper, on 12 April 2012 - 08:47 PM, said:

...

Further on, the thread of the Nepeth. Ever building, ever expanding, ever tilling more fields. Ever making more friends. I have no wish to think of the Nepeth tonight. My eyes pick up movement, far away. Thieves on the prowl, and darker things, even. The Tower above the Precipice is dark. The Terror of the Night is out there, dark magic at his fingertips. The Night Prophet, too, may be involved, although on which side of the conflict? With him, it is never simple. Flying carpets circle the buildings of the Cult and its university. And what of the House of Iron? What is their plan? They're very quiet, but they're also ibn Qolats oldest allies, Gold and Steel working in accord.

...


Terror of the Night = 'Mage Hassan the Dreadfather of the House of Terror'
Add the two without realising that he's Cult of Vultures, and it's not really that incomprehensible a mistake.

I've had to skim the thread fairly quickly to keep up with what was happening, I've not had a lot of time spare in the last week. There's not a lot I can do about that, unfortunately, but my low posting has been unintentional, since most of my avaliable time has been spent figuring out the bazaar and trying to support the winning conditions for my team, which, like the majority of players, involves trying to build up and make money for the acquisition of titles. I was surprised at first about how fast title were going, but I thought about it a bit more, and I figure they'll probably be made avaliable again when/if they become vacant, unless there is a way to designate an heir of sorts. Which seems a bit unlikely, but I wouldn't put it past Tapper for this game, given how complicated the rest of it is :(

Really not one of the mystery roles, sorry. But that's probably the only way to really scare people into a lynch in this game, particularly if you're right about the Cult of Vultures, Guild of Beggars and the Nepeth being the majority. Which is great for them, but I'm guessing that the majority of that faction have started out poor, at least in comparison to the Houses of Agreement, and also puts the faction at a higher chance of getting hit by a lynch in the search for the members of the mystery factions.


#639 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:30 PM

It is Day 3. 2 minutes remaining

12 Players still alive: Alkend, Anthras, Atrahal, Barghast, Galayn Lord, Kessobahn, Korabas, Korlat, Merrid, Okaros, Omtose, Tiamatha

7 votes to lynch, 6 votes to go to night.

5 Votes for Alkend ( Atrahal, Anthras, Galayn Lord, Korlat, Kessobahn )

Players not voted: Alkend, Barghast, Korabas, Merrid, Okaros, Omtose, Tiamatha
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#640 User is offline   Omtose 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:30 PM

I don't know - Atrahal seems pretty certain, almost like he knows more than he's letting on.

Share this topic:


  • 39 Pages +
  • « First
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users