Malazan Empire: Tales of the Desert 0.66: The Election of the Defterdar - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 39 Pages +
  • « First
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Tales of the Desert 0.66: The Election of the Defterdar game thread

#581 User is offline   Kessobahn 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 23-November 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:48 AM

View PostKorlat, on 17 April 2012 - 09:19 AM, said:

View PostKessobahn, on 17 April 2012 - 08:34 AM, said:

You see, Korlat has been open about things on thread but says here that we cannot take someone at face value. Merrid could easily have slipped up. Alkend could have too. Whereas I think Korlat is trying harder than most NOT to slip up and for that I want to know his reasons.


Interesting you should say that. I'm kind of surprised by it - if anything I've been playing this game faster and looser than I normally would. As you say, I've been open about things that a lot of players have not been. It has meant that I've had more votes placed on me so far than any other player, so it's hardly as though I'm being cautious.

I tend to draw a distinction between the sort of stuff Merrid has been saying and the sort of stuff I've been saying. I have not been attempting to reveal anything about my role or faction (apart from the bit where I said I was not a warrior). Anything people have decided to attribute to me with regards to my role/faction has been done through implication (well, apart from the times when my info has been for sale on the market, I suppose). You could say that I've 'slipped up' into giving that stuff away, I suppose. And I guess it's entirely possible that the whole mess of conclusions people have drawn from what I have said were wrong...just saying :(. Merrid, on the other hand, revealed his role intentionally. When a player acts with intent like that, that is when you have to question whether he's telling the truth.


You have intentionally played the way you are playing though. You have given us information freely. What you are saying is that we should not take what Merrid says at face value but we should with you?

#582 User is offline   Merrid 

  • Captain
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 175
  • Joined: 19-October 10

Posted 17 April 2012 - 10:01 AM

What's my slip up supposed to be? The fact I put out a really generic "merchant" title out there?

What I want to know is, if anyone has bought information and found out the person was a "mystery" group, why has that not been revealed on thread? It doesn't compromise your own team really, so I'm guessing that the people who have been "found" so far are not mystery groups members.

#583 User is offline   Korlat 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 23-November 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 10:12 AM

View PostKessobahn, on 17 April 2012 - 09:48 AM, said:

View PostKorlat, on 17 April 2012 - 09:19 AM, said:

View PostKessobahn, on 17 April 2012 - 08:34 AM, said:

You see, Korlat has been open about things on thread but says here that we cannot take someone at face value. Merrid could easily have slipped up. Alkend could have too. Whereas I think Korlat is trying harder than most NOT to slip up and for that I want to know his reasons.


Interesting you should say that. I'm kind of surprised by it - if anything I've been playing this game faster and looser than I normally would. As you say, I've been open about things that a lot of players have not been. It has meant that I've had more votes placed on me so far than any other player, so it's hardly as though I'm being cautious.

I tend to draw a distinction between the sort of stuff Merrid has been saying and the sort of stuff I've been saying. I have not been attempting to reveal anything about my role or faction (apart from the bit where I said I was not a warrior). Anything people have decided to attribute to me with regards to my role/faction has been done through implication (well, apart from the times when my info has been for sale on the market, I suppose). You could say that I've 'slipped up' into giving that stuff away, I suppose. And I guess it's entirely possible that the whole mess of conclusions people have drawn from what I have said were wrong...just saying :(. Merrid, on the other hand, revealed his role intentionally. When a player acts with intent like that, that is when you have to question whether he's telling the truth.


You have intentionally played the way you are playing though. You have given us information freely. What you are saying is that we should not take what Merrid says at face value but we should with you?


Well, any conclusions you infer from what I've said are up to you, not me. For sure you can decide not to take what I've said at face value if you like. But irrespective of what you think of me and my role/faction, my argument is that we certainly should not take Merrid's claim of Merchant as the truth, since that is the least threatening thing he could have claimed.

#584 User is offline   Merrid 

  • Captain
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 175
  • Joined: 19-October 10

Posted 17 April 2012 - 10:26 AM

Actually, this was my Role PM

Quote

You are the Djinn of Killer Bunny Rabbits

Actions:

Action 1: Swarm. Chose 5 targets. Summon a horde of killer bunny rabbits. All in their path are devoured.
Action 2: Cuddle Wuddle. Any player with more than 1 mud in their possession are "cuddled" with and devoured.
Action 3: Play Hide the Tail. Target any player. That player's mother is pleasurably ravaged.



So, as you can see I'm just a cute liddle bunny wunny.

#585 User is offline   Omtose 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 10:30 AM

Please Tapper, please include this Djinn in the 1.0 game!!!!

#586 User is offline   Alkend 

  • Lieutenant
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 110
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 10:40 AM

Hahaha I had to resist the urge to rep you Merrid :(

#587 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 10:40 AM

View PostOmtose, on 17 April 2012 - 10:30 AM, said:

Please Tapper, please include this Djinn in the 1.0 game!!!!

Heh. I might.
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#588 User is offline   Merrid 

  • Captain
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 175
  • Joined: 19-October 10

Posted 17 April 2012 - 10:41 AM

View PostOmtose, on 17 April 2012 - 10:30 AM, said:

Please Tapper, please include this Djinn in the 1.0 game!!!!


Whatever for? I'm in THIS game. :(

#589 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 11:13 AM

View PostMerrid, on 17 April 2012 - 10:41 AM, said:

View PostOmtose, on 17 April 2012 - 10:30 AM, said:

Please Tapper, please include this Djinn in the 1.0 game!!!!


Whatever for? I'm in THIS game. :(

Just in case you won't survive....
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#590 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 01:53 PM

It is Day 3. 6 hours and 39 minutes remaining

12 Players still alive: Alkend, Anthras, Atrahal, Barghast, Galayn Lord, Kessobahn, Korabas, Korlat, Merrid, Okaros, Omtose, Tiamatha

7 votes to lynch, 6 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Alkend ( Atrahal )
1 Vote for Barghast ( Korabas )

Players not voted: Alkend, Anthras, Barghast, Galayn Lord, Kessobahn, Korlat, Merrid, Okaros, Omtose, Tiamatha
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#591 User is offline   Anthras 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 02:00 PM

Okay, I >might< not be around at lynch time, got some birthday business going on so I might be busy. That said,I SHOULD be able to get on.

I'm not comfortable voting either of the trains atm, so I'll be sure to get on to at least lay a vote later.

#592 User is offline   Omtose 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 05-October 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 03:06 PM

I will be around for the lynch, but it doesn't look to me like much will happen. I think there's two factors at work here: The regular reluctance to lynch the wrong person, exacerbated by the fact that this is a faction game rather than town-scum, where on the other hand a few wrong lynches could be looked on as just collateral damage; and the fear that any move against anyone will reveal our own leanings (or at least, but just as dangerously, make others convinced, rightly or wrongly, over which way we lean). Some people are making a push with semi-cases, but it looks to me like almost all those cases are based on someone acting as neither HoA or Alliance. I don't know, it's kind of a stalemate on the thread. Ah well, it might be dull on here, but at least I don't have to had hosted a bloody stage play again like last week for little brats, counting my blessings.

By the way, did anyone go over Karatallid's posts? I can't even remember as I'm typing - were they assassinated? If so, it might be worth checking Kara's posts again to see if there's any link to a particular player, as that might be someone who's part of this mystery faction or factions. Not sure what else to do at this point.

#593 User is offline   Kessobahn 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 5
  • Joined: 23-November 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 03:12 PM

I don't know if i will have the time later on. I think that (looking over Kara's posts) maybe a good idea to see why he was killed IF the killer was brazen enough to kill him for attacking him. In terms of a lynch I think you need to be certain or close enough whether the person you want lynch is not in your faction or selling you the goods you need. One minute i am for a lynch and the next against it. I like Atrahal's case though, it is a well thought out case and worth following if I decide that lynching is the right thing to do.

#594 User is offline   Galayn Lord 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 08-November 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 03:24 PM

View PostAtrahal, on 16 April 2012 - 09:09 PM, said:

View PostAnthras, on 16 April 2012 - 08:14 PM, said:

View PostGalayn Lord, on 16 April 2012 - 07:51 PM, said:

View PostAnthras, on 16 April 2012 - 07:02 PM, said:

It certainly does appear that Korlat was defending Merrid, there. I have Korlat as Alliance, which would put Merrid at alliance as well.

Not sure what to think at this point, eagerly awaiting what Atrahal has to say again. Might be gone for a bit, but I'll be on when I can.


I doubt that Korlat and Merrid are on the same faction. They sure give that impression on thread, because of Korlat is so eagerly jumping to Merrids defense, but the information came up for sale on the same day and I doubt that only one faction has the finders and two finds by one finder seems to powerful as well. So unless one of the finders has put information about one of his faction members on sale, they are not very likely to be on the same team, imho.


Good catch, I didn't even think of that.


How does this prove anything? The most obvious conclusion is that Korlat purchased Merrid's info and then knew they WERE on the same faction, hence his defense. Your conclusion is not only more complicated but also doesn't take into account the obvious, and therefore my guess is that it's not that accurate.

Nice to see you guys agree about it though. :(


Err, did you bother to read my argument to the end or did you stop in the middle? Because you are completely ignoring the point of it.

But other people have a good point, when saying that the finders might be independent people. I didn't thought of that possibility, so that gives your scenario a higher likelihood.

#595 User is offline   Korlat 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 23-November 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 03:44 PM

View PostOmtose, on 17 April 2012 - 03:06 PM, said:

By the way, did anyone go over Karatallid's posts? I can't even remember as I'm typing - were they assassinated? If so, it might be worth checking Kara's posts again to see if there's any link to a particular player, as that might be someone who's part of this mystery faction or factions. Not sure what else to do at this point.


I had a look over Kara's posts towards the beginning of Day 3. I came to the conclusion that her posts made her look more likely to be HoA than Alliance (which made me think the killer might be an Alliance player who made a mistake). But feel free to double check my working, I might have missed something.

#596 User is offline   Path-Shaper 

  • Mafia Modgod
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 1,255
  • Joined: 01-October 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 03:55 PM

It is Day 3. 4 hours and 37 minutes remaining

12 Players still alive: Alkend, Anthras, Atrahal, Barghast, Galayn Lord, Kessobahn, Korabas, Korlat, Merrid, Okaros, Omtose, Tiamatha

7 votes to lynch, 6 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for Alkend ( Atrahal )
1 Vote for Barghast ( Korabas )

Players not voted: Alkend, Anthras, Barghast, Galayn Lord, Kessobahn, Korlat, Merrid, Okaros, Omtose, Tiamatha

Please get your battle, dusk, night and dawn actions in.
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
0

#597 User is offline   Atrahal 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 04:59 PM

View PostGalayn Lord, on 17 April 2012 - 03:24 PM, said:

View PostAtrahal, on 16 April 2012 - 09:09 PM, said:

View PostAnthras, on 16 April 2012 - 08:14 PM, said:

View PostGalayn Lord, on 16 April 2012 - 07:51 PM, said:

View PostAnthras, on 16 April 2012 - 07:02 PM, said:

It certainly does appear that Korlat was defending Merrid, there. I have Korlat as Alliance, which would put Merrid at alliance as well.

Not sure what to think at this point, eagerly awaiting what Atrahal has to say again. Might be gone for a bit, but I'll be on when I can.


I doubt that Korlat and Merrid are on the same faction. They sure give that impression on thread, because of Korlat is so eagerly jumping to Merrids defense, but the information came up for sale on the same day and I doubt that only one faction has the finders and two finds by one finder seems to powerful as well. So unless one of the finders has put information about one of his faction members on sale, they are not very likely to be on the same team, imho.


Good catch, I didn't even think of that.


How does this prove anything? The most obvious conclusion is that Korlat purchased Merrid's info and then knew they WERE on the same faction, hence his defense. Your conclusion is not only more complicated but also doesn't take into account the obvious, and therefore my guess is that it's not that accurate.

Nice to see you guys agree about it though. :(


Err, did you bother to read my argument to the end or did you stop in the middle? Because you are completely ignoring the point of it.

But other people have a good point, when saying that the finders might be independent people. I didn't thought of that possibility, so that gives your scenario a higher likelihood.




I've underlined your conclusion based on the evidence you presented; I'm saying your conclusion has no merit and is wrong. The defense of Merrid by Korlat is entirely independent of whether or not one of the Finders sold information about someone in their own faction. Did YOU read MY argument? ;)

#598 User is offline   Atrahal 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 05:15 PM

View PostAnthras, on 16 April 2012 - 06:58 PM, said:

View PostAtrahal, on 16 April 2012 - 06:24 PM, said:

Actually, I never mentioned Merrid at all, much less as one of my points against Alkend... But you have reiterated in the last few posts again and again that "Merrid is HoA". And you have denied many times that you bought his info. So, something is not right.





Only thing that could make sense to me here is either you're lying about buying Merrid's info or you got the info another way - like maybe you're the Finder. And in a game like this, with the Bazaar making the info available to the highest bidder, that is a powerful role that just might end up on the HoA side of the equation. Either way, your lack of concern about Alkend and your certainty of Merrid are combining to produce a decent amount of information about you. Either you're a liar or you know things other people don't.


:( My reading comprehension is horrible today, apparently. Let me address individual points as I see fit.

Atrahal said:



So, what "slipups" of Alkend's did you mean? I didn't see you actually reference or discuss your thoughts on any of them.



The slip ups that you point out, and discuss with Alkend. I told you I believe they could be innocent slip ups. You want me to find your post (which I read and formed an opinion on) and debate it point by point? I don't agree with it as a whole, and I left it at that because I don't feel like defending someone who I don't care about in the slightest.

If you want me to be specific, his slip ups about the dreadfather, mystery roles, and alliances. I find those completely innocent, and that could have happened to me if I didn't go back and research the names.



First, yes, you asked me to do that in this same post, so I don't see how you can have a problem with it. ;)

My point is exactly that - he IS innocent of making those mistakes. That's what is so revealing about it in context with the other things he says. He was not trying to manipulate information, he simply made a few mistakes and then said a couple other things that made those mistakes very important.

Antrhas said:


Atrahal said:


Also, let's say hypothetically you were right, and I did mention that - how does that make you less suspicious? If Alkend is, like I'm suggesting, from an alternate Faction with his own VCs, then it would make perfect sense for him to try to get Merrid lynched if he knew or guessed from Merrid's reveal that he was HoA. But because you are so sure Merrid is HoA, you aren't concerned about him and that also reduces your suspicion of Alkend....



I don't know why you make this connection. Are you thinking of someone else who is sure about Merrid being HoA? If so, no hard feelings, I've apparently done that often enough.

I see Merrid's pseudo reveal as a mistake of stress, to reveal as a merchant pretty much guarantees he is revealing as an HoA. I don't see what purpose he would have to do that if he were Alliance.

If Alkend is from an alternate faction he would be trying to get anyone lynched that wouldn't mess with his VC, other than himself of course. So yes, that would make sense. I don't see what Merrid being HoA instead of Alliance has to do with that at all.



The underlined was my point. You've accepted that Merrid is HoA. Here's Alkend's original post:

View PostAlkend, on 15 April 2012 - 03:40 AM, said:

I read that as more that the Dreadfather has the potential to wreak havock on the thieves but is currently allied with them. Which isn't to say that the allience will be permanant through the game. Would make sense since there's another role out there, I'd guess they'd be semi-allied with the Houses of Agreement as well.

Also, if you take a look at the bazaar you'll see that the Riddle of Despair has been marked at how much it's been used, which is all the actions except the last.


I'm saying that with the knowledge he reveals here, I'm predicting he is from a mystery faction and allied with the HoA right now. When talking about his own role, I don't think he's dumb enough to just come out and speculate about himself (in this case, the Dreadfather), but rather speculate about some other unknown element (but which is really his own Role). So he assumes (innocently) that the Dreadfather is a mystery role, and then speculates that the other role is probably allied with HoA. That is where the Merrid connection is.

Merrid -> HoA <- Alkend

Anthras said:


Okay, putting aside annoyance, I just went and took a close look at your case. I take back that I don't agree with it. I think Alkend could very well be a 2nd faction. My apologies, I'm sure I skimmed the long post.

Now, why do we want to lynch this independent instead of a member of the HoA? Do you feel the independant's VC is closer to fruition than the purchasing of two titles?


Atrahal said:



Only thing that could make sense to me here is either you're lying about buying Merrid's info or you got the info another way - like maybe you're the Finder. And in a game like this, with the Bazaar making the info available to the highest bidder, that is a powerful role that just might end up on the HoA side of the equation. Either way, your lack of concern about Alkend and your certainty of Merrid are combining to produce a decent amount of information about you. Either you're a liar or you know things other people don't.



My lack of concern about Alkend has been corrected, thanks to your (for once useful) badgering, and my certainty of Merrid is imagined.

I think you're stretching on the Merrid part, and rightfully angry about your Alkend case not receiving my attention. If you'd be so kind as to respond to my questions after the previous quote (namely the questions on lynch priority), that would be lovely.


First, you now say you kind of agree with my argument, but your actions and suggestions don't really reflect that. I think that having a mystery "role" alive and known, possibly currently allied with the outnumbered HoA but ALSO probably has either additional, separate VC's or has HoA's VCs while allied, is someone worth lynching. Their allegiance could obviously change - Alkend himself suggested it - but that makes him dangerous, too, and he could theoretically reach his VCs without really assisting the HoA anyway. So I think he is the best lynch candidate, hence my vote. Are you saying you want to vote for Merrid (someone we know is from the HoA, like you said? Or Korlat, who you also suspect to be HoA? I'm interested in your response here.

And no one else is voting. I think a timeout today is a bad idea.

edit - added names to quote blocks

This post has been edited by Atrahal: 17 April 2012 - 05:53 PM


#599 User is offline   Galayn Lord 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 08-November 08

Posted 17 April 2012 - 05:26 PM

Ok, I think we are talking at cross-purposes.

You are saying that Korlat is defending Merrid because he purchased his info. Now, the info about both had their info for sale the same day. In my original point I assumed that there were two finders, one for each team.
If Korlat really found Merrid to be in his team, either one of the finders sold the information about his teammate or we have independent finders as others suggested.

I hope that makes it clearer. :(

#600 User is offline   Anthras 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Game alts
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 17 April 2012 - 05:28 PM

Checking in, that out for a while.

I now see the one thing I didn't make a connection with that needs my vote. The Akend alliance with HoA. It DOES seem likely, so I will vote with you.

Vote Alkend

Peace

Share this topic:


  • 39 Pages +
  • « First
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users