Shadow, on 30 January 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:
I was implying that an alliance could simply create a winning condition. Not that they would vote night like in a town v scum game and win by nk. No, I meant that an alliance would create a condition in which the 2 allied factions win if they become the majority. It has nothing to do with the alliance players knowing eachother, and I never said it did.
Jesus Omtose, of course we dont know what alliances signify. The only people who know that are likely leaders, and half of those are dead.
I started this game with absolutely no knowledge of mechanics, my team, other teams, factions, killing, nothing. I know absolutely nothing for sure. But that hasn't stopped me from speculating and forming opinions that make sense.
Do you know what doesn't make sense? Lynching someone that isn't part of the powerhouse that is Ashikaga and Fujiwari. There's no sense in doing that if you're part of the 3 minor factions. I'm absolutely astonished that you would even suggest it.
Putting all that temporarily aside, there's no guarantee Kara (was it Kara or tiam?) is even Miura or Takeda. Could be a bluff.
But in the theoretical situation in which he IS part of one of those two groups, your play is absolutely horrible unless one of of three things is true.
1. You are a member of the Ashikaga clan.
2. You are a member of the Fujiwari clan.
3. You have some kind of information that I don't. This is always a possibility, but I am going to discount it for the sake of my sanity.
Ok, let's have some debate then.
I disagree about the winning conditions part. Why? Because it's not necessary. We could easily come down to a situation in which two factions have an equal number of surviving members AND they all know each other through reveals or however else. In that situation, no one will be lynched, and it's a draw, and the scene you described will happen whereby Shin informs us that such and such factions both managed to carve out territories for themselves.
So what do alliances do? Well, I went back and confirmed a suspicion I've had since the results of night 2. I'll be very surprised if no one else has also suspected this but has decided to keep their mouths shut and so sow added confusion and mystery. But I think that even if we are all (mostly) in different factions, we can put our heads together for something like this:
Day 1: Takeda-Fujiwari and Uesugi-Ashikaga alliances
Night 1: Ashikaga killed by Takeda
Day 2: Takeda-Fujiwari alliance
Night 2: Fujiwari killed by Miura/Uesugi, Takeda killed by Ashikaga
Day 3: Ashikaga-Fujiwari alliance
Night 3: Miura killed by Fujiwari, Miura killed by Ashikaga, Takeda killed by Uesugi
What's the common denominator here? Come on, I know you can work it out....yes...yes...almost there....that's right....come on.......
No allies have NK'd each other. Thus, my assumption is that alliances stop actions against your allies going through. Notice how there were less deaths when there were more alliances.