[Fener]

 Liosan, on 26 January 2012 - 02:25 AM, said:

 Shadow, on 26 January 2012 - 02:23 AM, said:

Yes yes, we see that you insisted you weren't defending or derailing an Eloth lynch. But that doesn't change the fact that your position itself defended Eloth. It doesn't matter how much you insist you're not trying to do something. You were, in essence, doing so.

No need to fret, I don't think. You only have 1 vote, and Silly has quite a few.

Speaking of votes, I haven't placed mine. I'll be around a bit before lynch, so I'll just wait until then to lay one down.

Wait, since when did you know that Silanah has multiple votes and that TS only has 1? Sounds like you're their clan leader or something.

*Chuckles at Liosan's mis-reading*

[Liosan]

Damn fail on my part

[Shadow]

@Liosan

Votes as in people have voted upon them.

@TS

Merrid wasn't in trouble for RPing. Merrid was in trouble for possibly bening signaled at. Merrid came on and answered questions rationally and calmly, while GH posted like a lunatic and didn't really do much to ease anyone's suspicions. So your pro-RPing argument was somewhat defending Eloth, and kinda-barely defending Merrid. I combine this with that you didn't vote for Eloth. I wouldn't take that you didn't vote him alone, obviously. Together is where it makes me feel better about it.

Of course, these are not cases. My list of three were the people that I felt could very possible be from GH's faction. I gave reasons for my suspicions. Some people agree with me, some people don't. I don't really mind either way, it's just nice being able to back up my opinions with where they formed from; ie the quotes I posted.

[Tulas Shorn]

 Shadow, on 26 January 2012 - 02:32 AM, said:

@Liosan

Votes as in people have voted upon them.

@TS

Merrid wasn't in trouble for RPing. Merrid was in trouble for possibly bening signaled at. Merrid came on and answered questions rationally and calmly, while GH posted like a lunatic and didn't really do much to ease anyone's suspicions. So your pro-RPing argument was somewhat defending Eloth, and kinda-barely defending Merrid. I combine this with that you didn't vote for Eloth. I wouldn't take that you didn't vote him alone, obviously. Together is where it makes me feel better about it.

Of course, these are not cases. My list of three were the people that I felt could very possible be from GH's faction. I gave reasons for my suspicions. Some people agree with me, some people don't. I don't really mind either way, it's just nice being able to back up my opinions with where they formed from; ie the quotes I posted.

Well no need to argue with you about it. I have stated my thoughts and obviously think that you are looking in the wrong direction (when it comes to me) for a culture hunt.

Edited for grammar fail

This post has been edited by Tulas Shorn: 26 January 2012 - 02:44 AM

[Shadow]

Hmm. Glad you kept it civil.

Anyway, I'm leaving. See you all before time out.

[Tulas Shorn]

 Shadow, on 26 January 2012 - 02:45 AM, said:

Hmm. Glad you kept it civil.

Anyway, I'm leaving. See you all before time out.

Why wouldn't I. Other then a short outburst I have been perfectly civil all of the game.

[Liosan]

Night all. see yall in the morning

[Tulas Shorn]

This was a very interesting exchange from earlier in the day. GL and Kara talking about alliances both open and secret ones. A pretty straight forward conversation to me.

 Galayn Lord, on 25 January 2012 - 11:51 AM, said:

 Karatallid, on 25 January 2012 - 11:43 AM, said:

 Galayn Lord, on 25 January 2012 - 11:32 AM, said:

I guess this was what Shin means by clues. It was also a kill of a guy from one alliance by a clan in the other.
What is puzzling me: it is called Open Alliance instead of just Alliance... that suggests there may be a different type?

So open allainces announced in thread but there could be hidden alliances told off thread?

I have no proof whatsoever and I don't want to scaremonger, it is just that "Open" is redundant if that is the only type of alliance, isn't it?

 Galayn Lord, on 25 January 2012 - 11:52 AM, said:

Anyhow, I am out for the next 6-7 hours.

 Korlat, on 25 January 2012 - 11:59 AM, said:

 Galayn Lord, on 25 January 2012 - 11:51 AM, said:

 Karatallid, on 25 January 2012 - 11:43 AM, said:

 Galayn Lord, on 25 January 2012 - 11:32 AM, said:

I guess this was what Shin means by clues. It was also a kill of a guy from one alliance by a clan in the other.
What is puzzling me: it is called Open Alliance instead of just Alliance... that suggests there may be a different type?

So open allainces announced in thread but there could be hidden alliances told off thread?

I have no proof whatsoever and I don't want to scaremonger, it is just that "Open" is redundant if that is the only type of alliance, isn't it?

I thought of 'Open' being that meaning alliances could be made at the same time. But also makes sense.

 Liosan, on 25 January 2012 - 12:36 PM, said:

Especially because he subtly suggested their were secret alliances

 Liosan, on 25 January 2012 - 12:43 PM, said:

Them right after he posts he says he wont be back for a while which makes it impossible for anyone to ask for clarofication. Hes playing too well.
Vote galayn lord

Then Liosan comes on it looks like try's to take advantage of GL going off thread for a extended period of time. That smacks of someone trying to start a lynch on someone who isn't around to defend themselves. Not a unheard of tatic in mafia. A little panicked from the previous end of day. Perhaps, looking for a easy target most definitely.

[Tulas Shorn]

 Liosan, on 26 January 2012 - 02:51 AM, said:

Night all. see yall in the morning

Of course this cross post. Now makes it look like I am doing the same thing.

[Tulas Shorn]

Now it is a good way into day 2 and

Sorrit 5


Everyone else who is alive has found at least enough content or what not to be able to contribute double digit posts.

[Tulas Shorn]

I know that there are several other players on. Would anyone of you mind talking to me. Seriously I took a bath today and have decent breath.

[Fener]

I'm here....for like another 5 minutes. My eyes are shutting as I type.

[Silanah]

 Tulas Shorn, on 26 January 2012 - 03:04 AM, said:

Now it is a good way into day 2 and

Sorrit 5


Everyone else who is alive has found at least enough content or what not to be able to contribute double digit posts.

Low posting has never been too suspicious. There are many reasons one would want keep a low profile in this game.

Edited for spelling.

This post has been edited by Silanah: 26 January 2012 - 03:09 AM

[Tulas Shorn]

 Silanah, on 26 January 2012 - 03:07 AM, said:

 Tulas Shorn, on 26 January 2012 - 03:04 AM, said:

Now it is a good way into day 2 and

Sorrit 5


Everyone else who is alive has found at least enough content or what not to be able to contribute double digit posts.

Low posting has never been too suspicious. There are many reasons one would wantt keep a low profile in this game.

But 5 posts. That isn't low posting that is being in a coma. I can shit out 5 posts by pre-breakfast.

This post has been edited by Tulas Shorn: 26 January 2012 - 03:09 AM

[Fener]

I agree that Sorrit needs to up their posting levels. As to what such low posting could mean.....no idea. Though the thought did run through my head earlier that any Uesugi out there might well be trying to keep their heads as low as possible today.

But then, with 18 people still around, it's pretty easy to hide in the crowd, and consequently difficult to pinpoint specific "non-attendees" as Uesugi.

[Tulas Shorn]

 Fener, on 26 January 2012 - 03:06 AM, said:

I'm here....for like another 5 minutes. My eyes are shutting as I type.

Nighty night

[Silanah]

Anyway, goodnight.

Not voting because I don't have enough substantial information.

[Tulas Shorn]

 Fener, on 26 January 2012 - 03:09 AM, said:

I agree that Sorrit needs to up their posting levels. As to what such low posting could mean.....no idea. Though the thought did run through my head earlier that any Uesugi out there might well be trying to keep their heads as low as possible today.

But then, with 18 people still around, it's pretty easy to hide in the crowd, and consequently difficult to pinpoint specific "non-attendees" as Uesugi.

or Ashikaga. There are actually two clan's that we could try to culture hunt. It would certainly give us a better chance at hitting one of them. Well 6 (I am assuming 4 per clan and 5 clans) to me is a higher number then 3.

[Omtose]

 Tulas Shorn, on 26 January 2012 - 02:59 AM, said:

This was a very interesting exchange from earlier in the day. GL and Kara talking about alliances both open and secret ones. A pretty straight forward conversation to me.

 Galayn Lord, on 25 January 2012 - 11:51 AM, said:

 Karatallid, on 25 January 2012 - 11:43 AM, said:

 Galayn Lord, on 25 January 2012 - 11:32 AM, said:

I guess this was what Shin means by clues. It was also a kill of a guy from one alliance by a clan in the other.
What is puzzling me: it is called Open Alliance instead of just Alliance... that suggests there may be a different type?

So open allainces announced in thread but there could be hidden alliances told off thread?

I have no proof whatsoever and I don't want to scaremonger, it is just that "Open" is redundant if that is the only type of alliance, isn't it?

 Galayn Lord, on 25 January 2012 - 11:52 AM, said:

Anyhow, I am out for the next 6-7 hours.

 Korlat, on 25 January 2012 - 11:59 AM, said:

 Galayn Lord, on 25 January 2012 - 11:51 AM, said:

 Karatallid, on 25 January 2012 - 11:43 AM, said:

 Galayn Lord, on 25 January 2012 - 11:32 AM, said:

I guess this was what Shin means by clues. It was also a kill of a guy from one alliance by a clan in the other.
What is puzzling me: it is called Open Alliance instead of just Alliance... that suggests there may be a different type?

So open allainces announced in thread but there could be hidden alliances told off thread?

I have no proof whatsoever and I don't want to scaremonger, it is just that "Open" is redundant if that is the only type of alliance, isn't it?

I thought of 'Open' being that meaning alliances could be made at the same time. But also makes sense.

 Liosan, on 25 January 2012 - 12:36 PM, said:

Especially because he subtly suggested their were secret alliances

 Liosan, on 25 January 2012 - 12:43 PM, said:

Them right after he posts he says he wont be back for a while which makes it impossible for anyone to ask for clarofication. Hes playing too well.
Vote galayn lord

Then Liosan comes on it looks like try's to take advantage of GL going off thread for a extended period of time. That smacks of someone trying to start a lynch on someone who isn't around to defend themselves. Not a unheard of tatic in mafia. A little panicked from the previous end of day. Perhaps, looking for a easy target most definitely.

Yes it was well timed but this seems to have been a general trait of Liosan's today, he doesn't seem overly bothered about who he could be hitting, as long as it is not him. There is something worrying about the way he has played, certainly seems very off. Either he is maybe just new and jumpy or he has information that makes him suitably certain the people he is accusing so easily are not tied to him.

I'll be around for a little while I think.

Edit: Grammar

This post has been edited by Omtose: 26 January 2012 - 03:17 AM

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 2. 10 Hours and 45 minutes Left.

18 Players still alive: Atrahal, Fener, Galayn Lord, Karatallid, Kessobahn, Korlat, Korvalain, Liosan, Merrid, Okaros, Olar Ethil, Omtose, Sheltatha Lore, Shadow, Silanah, Sorrit, Tiamatha, Tulas Shorn

10 Votes to Lynch. 9 to go to night.

1 Vote Tulas Shorn: Sheltatha Lore
4 Votes Silanah: Atrahal, Korvalain, Liosan, Kessobahn
2 Votes Liosan: Galayn Lord, Fener

Players not voting: Karatallid, Korlat, Merrid, Okaros, Olar Ethil, Omtose, Shadow, Silanah, Sorrit, Tiamatha, Tulas Shorn