'Altered Carbon' is one of the most stunningly nasty books I've read in a very long time. I mean that in a good way. The way it deals with the consequences of functional immortality ie The complete lack of respect and commoditisation (Is that a real word?

) of indivudual life that results. It does what all good SF should do: it takes an idea (quite a few of them, in fact) and takes it to it's logical (and in this case, awful) conclusion.
'Broken Angels', I feel, is a slightly weaker book. To some extent, I think that's because I was slightly prepared for it, having read it's predecessor I had some idea of what to expect from it, and therefore wasn't as shocked at the offhanded cruelty and casual diregard for life displayed by the protagonists. What did surprise me was the change of focus. Morgan has, rather sneakily IMO, expanded his universe whilst distracting the reader with a decent story. He's definately one to watch.
A note for you bibliophiles: 1st print hardbacks of 'Altered Carbon' have been, according to a book dealer friend of mine, rocketing in value. I was told the same thing about Peter Hamilton's 'The Reality Disfunction', so I expect it's just a flash-in-the-pan/fashion thing.
----------------
Funny how?
If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do. If some one maintains that two and two are five, or that Iceland is on the equator, you feel pity rather than anger, unless you know so little of arithmetic or geography that his opinion shakes your own contrary conviction. … So whenever you find yourself getting angry about a difference of opinion, be on your guard; you will probably find, on examination, that your belief is going beyond what the evidence warrants. Bertrand Russell