The Dude probably wins most paranoid player in the game... I hate finders!
Rashan, on 15 December 2009 - 08:32 PM, said:
Ok change my provisional....i need the killer around for 1 more night. I really need the bride to get off her ass and Kill Kalse or Sorrit.. but at the same time I need one of them to stay around.
Provisional order switch.
Fener first as I think he is bride side.
Then Sorrit
Then Shadow
Yeah, so i changed my thinking, Sorrit made a good point. It was probably The Bride, and Hitori hanzo as allies, with the Kid as a possible second ally. that leaves:
Bill and elle (Kalse and sorrit)
Shadow and Fener (Bride and Hitori)
Assassin (me)
HP, Alkend, and Liosan as Roled innos. Liosan probably killed the Charlie browns. Though that might have been HP. I still think alkend is a body guard, and the other was probably a vig of some sort that used their kill last night. In fact Hitori probably had a kill and used it last night.
I REALLY hope there is no finder.
So I think i am safe in assuming that Bill has a BP or 2 ( I mean if Karahad one, bill has to have one right?)
So there probably won't be 2 kills every night till the bride is dead.
Ugh.. this game is far from over.
Question: If someone has a BP for NK's and they throw the hammer on me, they still die right? cause its a day action, right? or does my retaliation just take away a BP. I think they should die because its not at night.. but.. i am a tad bit biased.
Path-Shaper, on 15 December 2009 - 09:07 PM, said:
Noted on the updated provisional. Fener > Sorrit > Shadow
Rashan, on 15 December 2009 - 08:43 PM, said:
So it says charlie brown and his wife were killed night 5... Does that mean my provisionals for night didn't go through?
Path-Shaper, on 15 December 2009 - 09:10 PM, said:
Huh? You did submit a provisional for Night 5 (very early after Day 5 started) and it was on Shadow, by the list you gave me.
I don't know what you mean by asking if the provisional "went through." I resolved night correctly, that's all I can tell you.
Thursday starts a new thread to clear his head and think things aloud for the benefit of the back room.
Sorrit, on 15 December 2009 - 08:39 PM, said:
Just going to drop all of my thoughts in this thread - it'll help me think and may be interesting for you Spoiler Heaven peeps. We'll start with this post from Liosan:
Liosan, on 15 December 2009 - 07:34 PM, said:
Back again briefly. I really need a better work ethic. I am afraid the projects are taking longer than expected so I may not be able to contribute much until tomorrow morning.
Just before I go though, I agree with Rashan that Shadow's assumption seems weird, especially as when Korbas was being lynched, he said he needed one extra vote for the lynch which meant one extra person had to vote, and Kalse was on that train, so that kind of disproves it.
The second paragraph doesn't really sound like something I'd expect scum to be concerned about. Do you take the effort to look back and find a counter example when it's not something that really concerns you? I mean, if you're scum you want to kill Kalse anyway, it doesn't really matter whether or not he's got two votes. I'm going to move Liosan down my list a bit (he has been low on my radar since he made a very forced Day 1 case anyway - once again, can't really picture scum doing it.
Sorrit, on 15 December 2009 - 08:48 PM, said:
Reasons Shadow might have claimed Kalse's vote counts double:
(1) He started off with that knowledge.
(2) He can cancel someone's vote every day, but we got the right number of voters for a lynch.
(3) He made a counting error.
I think (2) is most likely, but then I don't really see how he knows that it's Kalse who has the double vote - there were a lot of people on that train. He knows Kalse is Bill, but that's not really reason enough.
Either way, don't see why scum would volunteer that knowledge. Down the ladder a few rungs for him.
Thursday's logic is MOSTLY sound, but he is giving people a little too much leeway with the info they are volunteering. Remember: People offer as much info as they want to for the purpose of sound inno... you have to assume that someone could be lying when they are offering info and THEN make the determination if they are more or less likely inno!
Silencer knows that even by exposing himself so widely with his (double)vote, he probably need not worry about a lynch.
Fener, on 15 December 2009 - 09:04 PM, said:
Putting a lot on the line with that HP vote.
It's not devastating, as even with Kalse's supposed two-votes, I still need an additional vote over the limit to be killed. Day kills scare me more these days.
Requiring 7 out of 8 (or even 9) votes to lynch is a huge boon...survivalist character ftw. XD
Fener, on 15 December 2009 - 09:12 PM, said:
The funny thing is, under normal circumstances, the moment Korbas said she could be recruited to the Bride's faction, I'd stop believing her posts and the whole Kalse thing would go out the window. If I was the Assassin, I'd be killing the fuck out of Kalse the past two nights.
But instead, it serves me better - even if I'm blindly following the Bride without 'knowing' it...because I need the Bride or the Assassin to off the other for me to win. So I hold my peace for once.
That, and the fact that the whole fiasco with D'riss and Karatallid could be explained away not by someone being online, but by a Bride-like ability that, once they set in motion a certain action the other player's ability triggers and kills them both.
No-one is exploring these possibilities on thread, and it disheartens me to think that I might be one of the few even considering them in private. If I was anything other than a character who wants to survive, I'd be posting this stuff like crazy. XD
Fener, on 15 December 2009 - 09:30 PM, said:
3rd point: What is with all the distribution talk? I know it creeps back up around now, but the moment a player mentions 'recruit' or whatever that sort of shit goes out the window. Especially when you're basing it off the intro post.
I mean, the Bride's faction could have started very low. She then has to recruit Hanzo, Fatale (who would then act as a finder of Vipers, no?) and BB. So if she started with no allies at all but with plenty of recruit options, then yes, she has 'allies', she just needs to find them.
Ugh. really not liking the way people seem to be playing this, tbh. It's all fun and games (THE THUNDAH!, for example, is a hilarious piece of in-joke), however the way people seem not to be thinking...it's strange.
Elle and Bill are still alive, and currently the strong suggestion is that Kalse is Bill. But if Korbas was recruited to the Bride, then Sorritt is Hanzo (or similar) and Kalse is the Bride. That still leaves a lot of unknowns but there are plenty of characters as we've already had demonstrated, including the Assassin. Between us that counts for four out of 8 players!
WCS is a wonderful thing, but it has to be thought through. You can't play off one WCS when another one is more likely, because playing purely off the first scenario will just get you a lose. :S
Kind of interesting how everyone assumes Kalse is really Bill. What if Korbas set up an elaborate scheme to defend Kalse as the Bride, instead? In this case, it's sound, but an interesting point. Also, funny text in large. If only Silencer knew...
This post has been edited by Path-Shaper: 15 December 2009 - 10:02 PM
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.