Sorrit, on Jul 17 2009, 11:19 AM, said:
But that's what I'm saying - if someone is suspicious, I don't target them because I assume others are. I realize if EVERYBODY does that, it won't work out, but I don't htink most people play like that.
Well, sometimes, it pays to be certain yourself. It's all swell if player X seems scummy and gets targeted by finder Y, who learns he's inno, but who is to say Y doesn't get killed or lynched anyway before he can convince others/reveal? Then, at some point, yuo will either lynch X because he still seemed scummy, or investigate him after all

Especially if a player seems capable of leading the pack, you might want to know whether or not he is trustworthy.
The finders in this game are doing that (Morgy is both trying to get a lynch on Kesso as well as investigating him) - the 3 of them, if they survive for a day or 2, will have scanned the full playing field. But they are unaware of one another, may investigate the same people, it may be the guys that they've investigated that die, et cetera.
Also, HD is a guard. He won't know if his action actually did something, but the impact is big. As a result, it isn't a bad choice to select the person he thinks is most likely to be a killer, as opposed to the 'possibly scummy guy in the background'.
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.