[Mockra]

Korvalain, on May 28 2009, 06:29 PM, said:

That comment being?

"Hope I'm not wrong?"? That one?

Edit: You are not alone (for now), but I'm going to be reading other stuff on the forum while I'm waiting to discuss.

Yes that one.
It seems like extra effort to ride off his train vote to make a bad lynch have nothing to do with him. Either a scum tactic or just wants to stay out of the limelight by not providing any original thoughts.

[Korvalain]

Strange, but in another sense, everybody on there is saying to thereself "this is a stupid fucking case... why am I voting for it? Oh right, we get something at least... hope we don't hit roled"... thus us taking it to the wire waiting for Telas to come back.

What is your position on my case, or on the Lioshan case espoused earlier?

[Korvalain]

I'm only going to be here for another 45 minutes, so if anybody wants to talk up some stuff, please do so before I leave. I see 3 others lurking.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 2. 22 hours and 42 minutes remaining

15 Players still alive: Ampelas, D'riss, Emurlahn, Fener, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Kessobahn, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Mockra, Ruse, Shadow, Silanah, Tellan

8 votes to lynch, 8 votes to go to night


Players not voted: Ampelas, D'riss, Emurlahn, Fener, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Kessobahn, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Mockra, Ruse, Shadow, Silanah, Tellan


*cough* boring bastards *cough*

[Korvalain]

I'm trying damnit! No one wants to say a god damned thing!

Edit:

Either they've gone off and killed the Americans or I call shenanigans!

This post has been edited by Korvalain: 28 May 2009 - 07:21 AM

[Ruse]

just catching up guys....

Gamelon, on May 27 2009, 12:56 PM, said:

Well I am off to bed now. I'm sorry but the case on Telas isn't a case even for Day 1. I'm not going to bother placing a vote, my standards just aren't that low. I'd prefer no lynch at all to just the random Day 1 lynch we have at the moment. There's what a 2/17 chance of him coming up scum as a guess. Just not worth it.

the only way we can kill scum is by lynching.... 2/17 chance is better than 0/17
you cant be serious...

[Korvalain]

You showed up in time for me to be pretty much worthless, Ruse. But, I've got a little bit of time left to talk.

Also, I'm not pleased with the Mockra bail.

[Korvalain]

Hi Shin!

[Ruse]

Tellan, on May 27 2009, 02:35 PM, said:

Korvalain, on May 27 2009, 09:30 AM, said:

Lame, but probably fair, not much to comment on other than the role-play and shameless flirting going on. Let's see if he has anything to say within the next 11 hours. He arrived around 8:00 p.m. my time, and it seems Tellan (who should break up first, but well, meh, I've done FAR worse) was the only one else around.

But how do you break up with someone you've been with for almost 4 years?

Ruse, on May 27 2009, 09:48 AM, said:

Tellan, on May 26 2009, 09:02 PM, said:

OK, i've tried to concentrate...there's psuedosilly-cases on Kesso and Korlat, and sort of kinda not really suspicion of Shadow from Korlat. Shadow who has the most votes so far. Well, I wouldn't say that 3 joke votes out of 9 serious ones needed is something to get uppity about, as Korlat suggest, which makes me think Korlat is trying to add more pressure to Shadow by suggesting there's actually something serious there....

could this be an attempt at a symp signaling his master by defending him on something really weak?

The way i see it is that shadow could easily defend himself here, why does tellan feel the need to do it for him?
could be to show shadow who he is?....

Nice twisting of what I said. I didn't defend Shadow, I accused Korlat. And I'm still suspicious of why exactly Korlat found it suspicious that Shadow wasn't defending himself from 3 plainly joke votes. It still seems to me like he was trying to make something more suspicious stick on the individual with the most votes on them at the time.

I used the word suspicious too many times there.

Ruse, on May 27 2009, 01:44 PM, said:

oops got tellan and telas mixed up...
I still think it could be a signal...there was no need for tellan to step in and say anything about your remarks.


edit - removed pointless quotes

So I shouldn't say anything if I found something to be suspicious. Is that because I might point the finger of suspicion at your killer buddy?

heh heh
well well well

I like your OMGUS response....instead of just plainly answering me and my accusations, you try and make me look scummy in return?
You think my point is invalid?...because it is not.
Its perfectly reasonable for me to assume you could be signaling shadow by attacking the person who attacked him...its standard symp play. And i want the thread to know. I wont keep quiet when i see something just to safe from hurting your feelings.

But now you come back on the offensive...very interesting...especialy since you are using my own argument against me.
Its fine for you to use my own argument against you on myself....
so when you say it, it has merit...but when i say it i am talking out my arse?
hahaha

[Ruse]

Korvalain, on May 28 2009, 03:25 AM, said:

You showed up in time for me to be pretty much worthless, Ruse. But, I've got a little bit of time left to talk.

Also, I'm not pleased with the Mockra bail.

cool cool

just quickly catching up...posting as i go type of thing

[Korvalain]

Have at it. By the time you catch up I might be gone. I'd ask that you look at Lioshan, my own strange case, and at Mockra who is being worthless.

[Ruse]

alright im caught up...
Not much happened...2 kills is rather alarming
will have a read through again lil later when i got some time...
need to get the days work done first.

[Mockra]

Korvalain, on May 28 2009, 07:25 PM, said:

You showed up in time for me to be pretty much worthless, Ruse. But, I've got a little bit of time left to talk.

Also, I'm not pleased with the Mockra bail.

Oh im sorry that I don't have the time to sit around on a computer waiting for posts on a forum.. I have better things to do.
I don't care much for any case right now, slow game is slow.

[Korvalain]

Mockra, on May 28 2009, 03:53 AM, said:

Korvalain, on May 28 2009, 07:25 PM, said:

You showed up in time for me to be pretty much worthless, Ruse. But, I've got a little bit of time left to talk.

Also, I'm not pleased with the Mockra bail.

Oh im sorry that I don't have the time to sit around on a computer waiting for posts on a forum.. I have better things to do.
I don't care much for any case right now, slow game is slow.

I asked for you to comment on two specific cases. Don't feel like doing so for a reason, or do you just want to be pissed off?

Edit: wrong post numbers... don't look here!
Double Edit: 422 and 421.

This post has been edited by Korvalain: 28 May 2009 - 07:59 AM

[Tellan]

Ruse, on May 28 2009, 09:34 AM, said:

heh heh
well well well

I like your OMGUS response....instead of just plainly answering me and my accusations, you try and make me look scummy in return?
You think my point is invalid?...because it is not.
Its perfectly reasonable for me to assume you could be signaling shadow by attacking the person who attacked him...its standard symp play. And i want the thread to know. I wont keep quiet when i see something just to safe from hurting your feelings.

But now you come back on the offensive...very interesting...especialy since you are using my own argument against me.
Its fine for you to use my own argument against you on myself....
so when you say it, it has merit...but when i say it i am talking out my arse?
hahaha

How exactly did I not plainly answer your accusations? You said 'seems to me he's symping Shadow by defending him'. I replied 'I'm not defending Shadow, I'm attacking Korlat.' If Korlat had made the same comment on anyone else who had 3 joke votes on them at the time, I would have said the exact same thing.

As it happens, Korlat was inno, so clearly I was in the wrong (and Korlat just made a stupid comment). As for using your own argument against you - like you said, signalling someone by defending them is standard symp play, and could not what you said against me be construed as defending Korlat? Ergo...

But 'coming back on the offensive'? Would you prefer I simply ignored your comments? What fun that would be.

As it is, it's now moot to continue this as Korlat is dead. As has been said, there's likely scum on the train. There's also likely scum off it too. I'll try and take a look at the train but I won't likely be back on for another 8-10 hours or so.

[Korvalain]

I need to go to bed, but I don't want to do so without giving Mockra the chance to answer me.

[Fener]

Gah, thought I'd have more time today.

Ah well, exams are over, and long weekend coming up. Sorry guys.

[Ruse]

Tellan, on May 28 2009, 04:06 AM, said:

Ruse, on May 28 2009, 09:34 AM, said:

heh heh
well well well

I like your OMGUS response....instead of just plainly answering me and my accusations, you try and make me look scummy in return?
You think my point is invalid?...because it is not.
Its perfectly reasonable for me to assume you could be signaling shadow by attacking the person who attacked him...its standard symp play. And i want the thread to know. I wont keep quiet when i see something just to safe from hurting your feelings.

But now you come back on the offensive...very interesting...especialy since you are using my own argument against me.
Its fine for you to use my own argument against you on myself....
so when you say it, it has merit...but when i say it i am talking out my arse?
hahaha

How exactly did I not plainly answer your accusations? You said 'seems to me he's symping Shadow by defending him'. I replied 'I'm not defending Shadow, I'm attacking Korlat.' If Korlat had made the same comment on anyone else who had 3 joke votes on them at the time, I would have said the exact same thing.

As it happens, Korlat was inno, so clearly I was in the wrong (and Korlat just made a stupid comment). As for using your own argument against you - like you said, signalling someone by defending them is standard symp play, and could not what you said against me be construed as defending Korlat? Ergo...

But 'coming back on the offensive'? Would you prefer I simply ignored your comments? What fun that would be.

As it is, it's now moot to continue this as Korlat is dead. As has been said, there's likely scum on the train. There's also likely scum off it too. I'll try and take a look at the train but I won't likely be back on for another 8-10 hours or so.

You attacked me as part of your defense...its OMGUS.
Its a type of over reaction that one should look out for.

My point about that you could have been signaling shadow is still valid.
You didnt have to jump in there on korlats musings about shadow...im sure shadow was perfectly capable of answering himself.
you knew it was stupid you didnt need to answer for him, yet you did, so therefore it could have been a signal.

simple really...

[Korvalain]

Vote Mockra

Get as pissed as you like. I asked you a question, and you didn't answer it. It is either laziness or an attempt to let it slide. Neither of which are good as inno.

I am still intersted in the Shadow/Kessobahn dance.

I have to sleep. Goodnight. Be back in about 8 hours.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 2. 20 hours and 22 minutes remaining

15 Players still alive: Ampelas, D'riss, Emurlahn, Fener, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Kessobahn, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Mockra, Ruse, Shadow, Silanah, Tellan

8 votes to lynch, 8 votes to go to night

1 Vote for Mockra: (Korvalain)


Players not voted: Ampelas, D'riss, Emurlahn, Fener, Gamelon, Hood's Path, Kessobahn, Liosan, Meanas, Mockra, Ruse, Shadow, Silanah, Tellan

Shinrei, taking Path-Shaper for a spin.

This post has been edited by Path-Shaper: 28 May 2009 - 09:40 AM