Werthead, on Jun 27 2009, 05:21 AM, said:
HoosierDaddy, on Jun 27 2009, 02:53 AM, said:
To me, they are endings that are purposefully mysterious for the sole reason as to create suspense as to what has happened. I don't see any of that in MBotF.
It sounds suspiciously like double-standards to me, like when Jordan gets wailed on for extending his series from 6 to 14 books but Erikson and Esslemont get a pass for going from 10 to 22. If GRRM does it, it's a dirty cliffhanger, but if SE does it it's a clear shelving of closed narrative lines which may or may not be picked up again later. Hmm.
Have you considered going into politics?
I think the big point here is the difference between leaving threads dangling at the end of story, or during the story to lead into future novels and series being planned, like Erikson does. He still maintains the larger scheme of the book, and gives them a solid conclusion at the end. The book feels like a solid narrative, even if it does tie into many other books, and leaves some unanswered questions.
While GRRM doesn't finish the storyline in the book. He has left blatant cliiffhangers, with no real feeling of conclusion to the book.
I think Karsa fits somewhere in between, which isn't all that fair, especially since GRRM series will hopefully wrap up all the ends, meanwhile Karsa is left dangling. If Karsa is done in the Crippled God plotline though, so be it.
I think however we seem to be missing a big point. These are series of books, meant to tell a whole story, none of the books are really meant to be taken on there own.
Would you watch an episode (or even a season) of the Wire, and complain about it not making sense, dropped plot lines, character disappearing, when you haven't seen the rest of the series?