Tsundoku, on 14 May 2019 - 09:31 AM, said:
Not enough people?
Waaaaay too much work - as decided by those who don't actually have to do it?
A goodly percentage of said work which is quite unnecessary?
Totally unrealistic timeframes?
Poorly managed "stakeholder" (dear god I loathe that buzzword almost as much as "proactive") expectations?
Constant interruptions requesting updates? (I'd get it done sooner if you'd all just leave me TF alone! )
Shifting goalposts with no accompanying rollback of deadlines?
Sounds familiar.
My sympathies.
Sounds like they need to pivot towards a more holistic, integrative approach that engages the self-empowerment of the stakeholder employee paradigm, while maintaining a streamlined evergreen outlook, contextually.
Also, artisinal.