Tsundoku, on 14 May 2019 - 09:31 AM, said:
Not enough people?
Waaaaay too much work - as decided by those who don't actually have to do it?
A goodly percentage of said work which is quite unnecessary?
Totally unrealistic timeframes?
Poorly managed "stakeholder" (dear god I loathe that buzzword almost as much as "proactive") expectations?
Constant interruptions requesting updates? (I'd get it done sooner if you'd all just leave me TF alone!

Shifting goalposts with no accompanying rollback of deadlines?
Sounds familiar.
My sympathies.
Sounds like they need to pivot towards a more holistic, integrative approach that engages the self-empowerment of the stakeholder employee paradigm, while maintaining a streamlined evergreen outlook, contextually.
Also, artisinal.