Korvalain, on Oct 8 2008, 02:59 PM, said:
Tennes, on Oct 8 2008, 04:41 PM, said:
All the pressure and attention is on the Corleones. They're down to four already. Would it be a good plan to try and ferret out the last few and just remove them from the game entirely? One less family to worry about....
It doesn't matter what I am: yesterday Barghast voted me thinking I'm Corleone, so he's very much probably not one. So if we want to "level the field", he's my target. Plus, i have feelings he's FM, even if noone agrees.
I'm quite new to this style of game, I'm used to the standard good guys vs. bad guys set up. So I'm asking from a tactical point of view, why would you want to level the field? Surely that would be helping the corleones? Why would you want to do anything that is an advantage to them if you're not one of them?
Quote
If you want to keep hunting Corleones, look at Ruse. When a second vote appeared on someone who's probably not Corleone, he jumped on the voter (and a bit on me too). So that would be the best choice.
Noted. I will have to read some more before I decide on it though.
Gamelon, on Oct 8 2008, 03:00 PM, said:
So Meanas is gone. I wonder why?
I still think Barghast is suspicious for being so nice to the bastard Telas. I don't know what he was thinking, but I've got a gut feeling he's up to no good. That he is FM is just a guess, not a case, but it's an educated guess. It might be wrong, it might be right. But the playing nice with Telas is what gets to me - not because it's that suspicious in itself, but because Telas got crap from everybody else basically.
vote Barghast
He didn't get any crap from me. People were only jumping on him because of his game style. He was being aggressive and that always rubs people up the wrong way. That's no reason to vote for Barghast, in fact, I'm more convinced by Korvalain's argument that he's probably not Corleone which makes me even more reluctant to vote for him.