Posted 04 August 2007 - 06:02 AM
As far as I understand, Red Mask's skills were mostly focused on the individual side of combat, mainly with the whip and the axe. He was the charasmatic leader of the Awl, without a doubt, but was described as nothing special re. tactics. The novel never is really clear about Red Mask's military experiences outside the Awl, during his exile, but it is clear that Toc was asked by Red Mask to help with training.
In the book early on, Red Mask asked Toc to train his Awl warriors in Malazan battle tactics. Before Toc arrived, Awl battle tactics were ineffective against the organized and heavilly armed Letherii army. After the training of the Awl warriors by Toc, the Awl scored their first victory against the Letherii. This training is only assumed, because the author never really follows up on the idea. The victory in the first battle may have been more due to Toc's training of the Awl warriors in Malazan battle tactics and combat, and Letherii laziness, than any tactical brilliance on the part of Red Mask.
Although Red Mask provided the charasmatic focus of the Awl, maybe the Toc storyline provided a rational for the relative success of the Awl. Without Toc to teach them new Malazan tactics, the Awl storyline really couldn't have changed a lot, in spite of Red Mask. The Awl, who were basically nomads, would have gathered under Red Mask and been slaughtered, as usual, by the Letherii military machine, which was well armed and trained.
Of course, Toc could only help so much. The Awl were nomads utterely dependent on their herds, they had inferior arms compared to the Letherii and they didn't have mages, as Wintermute notes. So they lost in the end.
Also, with Toc as part of the story, the author could tie up the storyline with Tool.