Azath Vitr (D, on 21 February 2020 - 04:49 AM, said:
polishgenius, on 20 February 2020 - 08:58 PM, said:
I liked RIver of Stars more than Under Heaven, though they're both good (... but the Chinese source material is better).
While I've only studied classical Chinese a little, GGK provides a(n un)fairly typical post-Modernist misrepresentation of it. His prose is also just okay in these books.
I loved his other books when I was twelve.
What's the source material? I gather the events of Under Heaven mirror the real history of the time its based on very closely (the most of any of his books), but are there presumably Chinese stories also based around then?
I just re-read River and would move it up a few slots, above Earth and Sky and maybe Arbonne (pending a re-read of that), but it still has the issue for me that in the latter third it just starts skipping massive chunks of time, plot and character development at a time in a really haphazard fashion. It really feels like it should have been at least three books. Under Heaven is my favourite in that it's the precise opposite, of all Kay's books bar Al-Rassan it has the strongest, most consistent throughline (and it pips Al-Rassan coz it sticks the landing better).
I'm now reading A Brightness Long Ago and it's superb. Probably juuuust lacking the really great scenes of tension-shifting conversational intrigue that I love so much about his best work to put it in the top three, but it does other things better than Kay has ever done, in particular having some developments that are genuinely shocking by building character arcs independently of the major plot points that those plot turns can then disrupt.