Twilight Imperium 8 : Magi's Madness - Chat Thread
#3241
Posted 15 November 2021 - 03:23 PM
Do I need to post that sabotage in thread? D'rek needs to make an alternative move
#3242
Posted 15 November 2021 - 03:26 PM
Ya, I'm thinking
#3245
Posted 15 November 2021 - 04:21 PM
Action updated
#3246
Posted 15 November 2021 - 04:41 PM
Danke! Just need some input from Tatts before I finalize resolution of the action!
#3247
Posted 15 November 2021 - 07:48 PM
@Morgoth:
I can't remember if you actually still have it, but can I get the old Sardakk racial in any way from you? Can he still do swaps while passed?
(I know we don't border, so it'd have to be a to-D'rek-then-to-me kind of thing).
I can't remember if you actually still have it, but can I get the old Sardakk racial in any way from you? Can he still do swaps while passed?
(I know we don't border, so it'd have to be a to-D'rek-then-to-me kind of thing).
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#3248
Posted 15 November 2021 - 08:06 PM
Khellendros, on 15 November 2021 - 07:48 PM, said:
@Morgoth:
I can't remember if you actually still have it, but can I get the old Sardakk racial in any way from you? Can he still do swaps while passed?
(I know we don't border, so it'd have to be a to-D'rek-then-to-me kind of thing).
I can't remember if you actually still have it, but can I get the old Sardakk racial in any way from you? Can he still do swaps while passed?
(I know we don't border, so it'd have to be a to-D'rek-then-to-me kind of thing).
Other players can initiate a trade with him, but I don't believe he can initiate any more trades until Agenda phase.
#3249
Posted 16 November 2021 - 07:52 AM
Sure, I'm up for it!
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
#3250
Posted 16 November 2021 - 01:07 PM
Okie dokie I'm happy to facilitate that. Will toss it onto the end of my turn.
#3251
Posted 17 November 2021 - 05:06 PM
I've decided it's time to get crazy.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#3252
Posted 17 November 2021 - 05:38 PM
Finds corneeq resculon on the map.
did not see that coming
did not see that coming
#3253
Posted 17 November 2021 - 06:05 PM
Imperial Historian, on 17 November 2021 - 05:38 PM, said:
Finds corneeq resculon on the map.
did not see that coming
did not see that coming
That's because it is very unlikely to go in my favour, but as the way I've played this round has dashed my slim hopes of winning, I figure I don't have much to lose anyway.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#3254
Posted 18 November 2021 - 12:06 AM
Awesome! Go Khell!
#3255
Posted 18 November 2021 - 08:00 PM
Sorry for resolution delay, it's budget week at work so it's been a busy couple of days! Working on resolution now!
#3256
Posted 18 November 2021 - 10:20 PM
Anti fighter barage hits fighters so why am I sustaining damage on 2 dreads at that point?
Thanks for resolving Blend.
Good luck Khell you're pushing the boundaries. I applaud
Thanks for resolving Blend.
Good luck Khell you're pushing the boundaries. I applaud
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#3257
Posted 18 November 2021 - 11:16 PM
Tattersail_, on 18 November 2021 - 10:20 PM, said:
Anti fighter barage hits fighters so why am I sustaining damage on 2 dreads at that point?
Thanks for resolving Blend.
Good luck Khell you're pushing the boundaries. I applaud
Thanks for resolving Blend.
Good luck Khell you're pushing the boundaries. I applaud
Cause I'm an idiot and forgot that it was AFB and just assumed 2 regular hits. Will adjust.
#3258
Posted 19 November 2021 - 02:50 PM
lol.
Unfortunately (for me), I'm not sure it's quite right. On that first round after the Shields Holding, you say for Tatts 4 hits, 3 of which have to be assigned to non-fighter ships, but I think it's all four that need to be. I'm happy to be wrong if that's the case though!
Unfortunately (for me), I'm not sure it's quite right. On that first round after the Shields Holding, you say for Tatts 4 hits, 3 of which have to be assigned to non-fighter ships, but I think it's all four that need to be. I'm happy to be wrong if that's the case though!
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#3259
Posted 19 November 2021 - 02:52 PM
FML. Why did it have to be right at the beginning of all the rest of the resolution....