[Tapper]

D, on 20 April 2021 - 06:07 PM, said:

Tapper, on 20 April 2021 - 06:04 PM, said:

D, on 20 April 2021 - 05:50 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 20 April 2021 - 05:44 PM, said:

I don't think there is a strategy card that I'd be willing to pay 2TG for I'm afraid, I would agree to not pick tech if you made tapper speaker.

Probably not worth it for me to do it for just 2TG from Tapper as this will probably make me last pick in round 3, but let's see what Tapper has to say first.

Well, you ask me to pay the same amount as IH while deferring 2 strategies instead of 1.
That's a bit of a head scratcher without compensation elsewhere, either from him to me or you to me.

Fair point. I will reconsider the price then. 1 TG from Tapper and 1 hazardous relic fragment from IH, the remaining terms the same. Is that palatable to you both?

I could live with that. If IH is on board, we can trade for my TA now, you can return me a TG when it pops (or now, if you prefer).

[D'rek]

Tapper, on 20 April 2021 - 06:11 PM, said:

D, on 20 April 2021 - 06:07 PM, said:

Tapper, on 20 April 2021 - 06:04 PM, said:

D, on 20 April 2021 - 05:50 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 20 April 2021 - 05:44 PM, said:

I don't think there is a strategy card that I'd be willing to pay 2TG for I'm afraid, I would agree to not pick tech if you made tapper speaker.

Probably not worth it for me to do it for just 2TG from Tapper as this will probably make me last pick in round 3, but let's see what Tapper has to say first.

Well, you ask me to pay the same amount as IH while deferring 2 strategies instead of 1.
That's a bit of a head scratcher without compensation elsewhere, either from him to me or you to me.

Fair point. I will reconsider the price then. 1 TG from Tapper and 1 hazardous relic fragment from IH, the remaining terms the same. Is that palatable to you both?

I could live with that. If IH is on board, we can trade for my TA now, you can return me a TG when it pops (or now, if you prefer).

I'm happy to just have you owe me 1 and send it whenever you next acquire commodities/TGs, rather than use the PN. You might get a commodity from exploration sooner than refreshing commodities, for example.

[Tapper]

D, on 20 April 2021 - 06:13 PM, said:

Tapper, on 20 April 2021 - 06:11 PM, said:

D, on 20 April 2021 - 06:07 PM, said:

Tapper, on 20 April 2021 - 06:04 PM, said:

D, on 20 April 2021 - 05:50 PM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 20 April 2021 - 05:44 PM, said:

I don't think there is a strategy card that I'd be willing to pay 2TG for I'm afraid, I would agree to not pick tech if you made tapper speaker.

Probably not worth it for me to do it for just 2TG from Tapper as this will probably make me last pick in round 3, but let's see what Tapper has to say first.

Well, you ask me to pay the same amount as IH while deferring 2 strategies instead of 1.
That's a bit of a head scratcher without compensation elsewhere, either from him to me or you to me.

Fair point. I will reconsider the price then. 1 TG from Tapper and 1 hazardous relic fragment from IH, the remaining terms the same. Is that palatable to you both?

I could live with that. If IH is on board, we can trade for my TA now, you can return me a TG when it pops (or now, if you prefer).

I'm happy to just have you owe me 1 and send it whenever you next acquire commodities/TGs, rather than use the PN. You might get a commodity from exploration sooner than refreshing commodities, for example.

Fair enough.

[D'rek]

Well, IH was here a moment ago but seems to have stepped away for now. I'll throw a placeholdery bit up in case Khell comes by and wants to post his turn without waiting, but will wait until IH return and agree/disagree for it to be final.

[D'rek]

@Twelve - Please choose the CT in Mehar Xull when you use your agent, and you can put the TG transfer from me into your post immediately at start of your turn, mucho thank you.

[Imperial Historian]

Having looked at the strategy cards and relics, I'm not that bothered about having last pick so will pass on the deal. If tapper wants to pay you for speaker and first pick I would let you have your choice of strategy d'rek.

[D'rek]

At that point, I don't think it's worth 1 TG for me 'cause I'll probably end up last next round after. No worries, we'll go with the simple version then.

[Tapper]

D, on 20 April 2021 - 06:34 PM, said:

At that point, I don't think it's worth 1 TG for me 'cause I'll probably end up last next round after. No worries, we'll go with the simple version then.

Okidoki.

[Galactic Council]

Tapper and Twelve, lemme know when you've added your exploration resolutions to your posts so that I don't miss them on the next map update!

[D'rek]

Wow that Centauri though

[twelve]

Galactic Council, on 20 April 2021 - 08:34 PM, said:

Tapper and Twelve, lemme know when you've added your exploration resolutions to your posts so that I don't miss them on the next map update!

Okay. I just sent a pn to you about it but I'll put it in my post now. I'd like to see what action card I get before posting.

Tapper. I'd like to discuss our border and I can see ceding claim on Everra to you for a reasonable price. But first I want to know what your intentions are regarding the Rigel system.

[twelve]

Never mind Blend. You beat me to it.

[D'rek]

twelve, on 20 April 2021 - 09:03 PM, said:

Secondary of Politics: Exhaust Jae Mir Kan remove CT from Mehar Xull < Gain 1 TG from D'rek
< Gain 2 Action cards

^^technically you have to move the gain 1 TG part to after all secondaries, as it's a Transaction which must occur after the "start of your turn".

[Galactic Council]

D, on 20 April 2021 - 09:08 PM, said:

twelve, on 20 April 2021 - 09:03 PM, said:

Secondary of Politics: Exhaust Jae Mir Kan remove CT from Mehar Xull < Gain 1 TG from D'rek
< Gain 2 Action cards

^^technically you have to move the gain 1 TG part to after all secondaries, as it's a Transaction which must occur after the "start of your turn".

Agree - no transactions during secondaries. Please move it so it's after your secondaries.

[twelve]

D, on 20 April 2021 - 09:08 PM, said:

twelve, on 20 April 2021 - 09:03 PM, said:

Secondary of Politics: Exhaust Jae Mir Kan remove CT from Mehar Xull < Gain 1 TG from D'rek
< Gain 2 Action cards

^^technically you have to move the gain 1 TG part to after all secondaries, as it's a Transaction which must occur after the "start of your turn".

It's a transaction done at the time of my secondary window to make it binding. As my agent can only be used in the secondary window I dont see why this wont be allowed.

[D'rek]

I'm gonna do it whether it's binding or not. But fair point that in a real game this would be binding because secondary happens during one of the players' turns while here they don't. Hmm.

[Galactic Council]

twelve, on 20 April 2021 - 09:15 PM, said:

D, on 20 April 2021 - 09:08 PM, said:

twelve, on 20 April 2021 - 09:03 PM, said:

Secondary of Politics: Exhaust Jae Mir Kan remove CT from Mehar Xull < Gain 1 TG from D'rek
< Gain 2 Action cards

^^technically you have to move the gain 1 TG part to after all secondaries, as it's a Transaction which must occur after the "start of your turn".

It's a transaction done at the time of my secondary window to make it binding. As my agent can only be used in the secondary window I dont see why this wont be allowed.

Iz a good point. I guess there are abilities that depend on the secondaries after all. I think in this case we have to allow the trade to happen alongside the secondary.

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 20 April 2021 - 09:18 PM

[Galactic Council]

But you do also need to mark the tech specialty of Rigel III in your game post.

[Tapper]

twelve, on 20 April 2021 - 08:46 PM, said:

Galactic Council, on 20 April 2021 - 08:34 PM, said:

Tapper and Twelve, lemme know when you've added your exploration resolutions to your posts so that I don't miss them on the next map update!

Okay. I just sent a pn to you about it but I'll put it in my post now. I'd like to see what action card I get before posting.

Tapper. I'd like to discuss our border and I can see ceding claim on Everra to you for a reasonable price. But first I want to know what your intentions are regarding the Rigel system.

Rigel is for many ways and purposes a system I want to occupy, and soon, too. We can always work something out with regard to VCs requiring X planet types.

Everra: the value for me would be as a dock for MR. If I am the first to take possession of Everra, I will certainly not pay for the privilege of being your buffer against Morgoth.

[Imperial Historian]

Tapper, on 21 April 2021 - 06:22 AM, said:

twelve, on 20 April 2021 - 08:46 PM, said:

Galactic Council, on 20 April 2021 - 08:34 PM, said:

Tapper and Twelve, lemme know when you've added your exploration resolutions to your posts so that I don't miss them on the next map update!

Okay. I just sent a pn to you about it but I'll put it in my post now. I'd like to see what action card I get before posting.

Tapper. I'd like to discuss our border and I can see ceding claim on Everra to you for a reasonable price. But first I want to know what your intentions are regarding the Rigel system.

Rigel is for many ways and purposes a system I want to occupy, and soon, too. We can always work something out with regard to VCs requiring X planet types.

Everra: the value for me would be as a dock for MR. If I am the first to take possession of Everra, I will certainly not pay for the privilege of being your buffer against Morgoth.

You know you are up right tapper?