Twilight Imperium 8 : Magi's Madness - Chat Thread
#241
Posted 20 April 2021 - 04:27 PM
PoK Living Rules Reference. Page 25 for 62.21a, and also page 5 for Secret Objectives during setup.
#242
Posted 20 April 2021 - 04:29 PM
Thanks, didn't think to check the PoK rules reference as SOs have been around since before PoK.
#243
Posted 20 April 2021 - 04:30 PM
#244
#245
Posted 20 April 2021 - 05:01 PM
I already miss my Eidolons
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
#246
Posted 20 April 2021 - 05:02 PM
.. or, I guess it was the Distant Suns ability of the Naaz-Rokha technically. But still, they were too beautiful for this world.
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
#248
#249
Posted 20 April 2021 - 05:31 PM
#250
Posted 20 April 2021 - 05:32 PM
I worry a great deal about D’rek hanging out in the corner growing fat on trade while we all fight amongst ourselves.
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
#251
#252
Posted 20 April 2021 - 05:33 PM
#253
Posted 20 April 2021 - 05:36 PM
Imperial Historian, on 20 April 2021 - 05:32 PM, said:
Not at the moment
Imperial Historian, on 20 April 2021 - 05:33 PM, said:
Yeah, it's good while it lasts but it ain't gonna last once everyone neighbours up. Plus 3 factions with only 2 commodities in the game so less trading overall.
#254
Posted 20 April 2021 - 05:39 PM
D, on 20 April 2021 - 05:36 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 20 April 2021 - 05:32 PM, said:
Not at the moment
Imperial Historian, on 20 April 2021 - 05:33 PM, said:
Yeah, it's good while it lasts but it ain't gonna last once everyone neighbours up. Plus 3 factions with only 2 commodities in the game so less trading overall.
It's why you should buddy up to me as well as IH. Me especially since we are oooh so close. We can both be fat and happy.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#255
Posted 20 April 2021 - 05:40 PM
@IH and Tapper - I'm about to play POLITICS. Let's talk Speaker, I have an offer:
Benefit for you two is getting 2nd/3rd choice of SC next round, instead of being last and second-last pick.
What do you think?
- I make Tapper Speaker
- I get first choice of strategy card for next round (it will be TECH).
- IH pays me 2 TG and promises not to pick my choice of strategy card next round.
- Tapper pays me 2 TG (or gives me his trade PN) and promises not to pick mine or IH's choice of strategy card.
Benefit for you two is getting 2nd/3rd choice of SC next round, instead of being last and second-last pick.
What do you think?
#256
Posted 20 April 2021 - 05:44 PM
I don't think there is a strategy card that I'd be willing to pay 2TG for I'm afraid, I would agree to not pick tech if you made tapper speaker.
#257
Posted 20 April 2021 - 05:49 PM
I might be willing to trade a hazardous relic though.
#258
Posted 20 April 2021 - 05:50 PM
Imperial Historian, on 20 April 2021 - 05:44 PM, said:
I don't think there is a strategy card that I'd be willing to pay 2TG for I'm afraid, I would agree to not pick tech if you made tapper speaker.
Probably not worth it for me to do it for just 2TG from Tapper as this will probably make me last pick in round 3, but let's see what Tapper has to say first.
#259
Posted 20 April 2021 - 06:04 PM
D, on 20 April 2021 - 05:50 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 20 April 2021 - 05:44 PM, said:
I don't think there is a strategy card that I'd be willing to pay 2TG for I'm afraid, I would agree to not pick tech if you made tapper speaker.
Probably not worth it for me to do it for just 2TG from Tapper as this will probably make me last pick in round 3, but let's see what Tapper has to say first.
Well, you ask me to pay the same amount as IH while deferring 2 strategies instead of 1.
That's a bit of a head scratcher without compensation elsewhere, either from him to me or you to me.
Everyone is entitled to his own wrong opinion. - Lizrad
#260
Posted 20 April 2021 - 06:07 PM
Tapper, on 20 April 2021 - 06:04 PM, said:
D, on 20 April 2021 - 05:50 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 20 April 2021 - 05:44 PM, said:
I don't think there is a strategy card that I'd be willing to pay 2TG for I'm afraid, I would agree to not pick tech if you made tapper speaker.
Probably not worth it for me to do it for just 2TG from Tapper as this will probably make me last pick in round 3, but let's see what Tapper has to say first.
Well, you ask me to pay the same amount as IH while deferring 2 strategies instead of 1.
That's a bit of a head scratcher without compensation elsewhere, either from him to me or you to me.
Fair point. I will reconsider the price then. 1 TG from Tapper and 1 hazardous relic fragment from IH, the remaining terms the same. Is that palatable to you both?