[Imperial Historian]

Galactic Council, on 21 April 2021 - 10:23 PM, said:

Tatts - as a reminder, the Support for the Throne from the Muaat is in the play area, so you should only be showing 4 L1Z1X, 1 Muaat PN as in your hand in your game post.

IH - same goes to you for Tatts' SftT.

I'm not sure what you mean. From what you've written you want the PNs in play area to be in hand as well, but from what you are saying you mean the opposite.

Is it:
5 Muaat or 5 Muaat 1 lizix

[Galactic Council]

Sorry, I thought it was Tatts that had one of your PNs other than your SftT, but it's actually you who had 1 of Tatts' PNs other than his SftT.

So Tatts should be showing 4 L1Z1X. IH should be showing 5 Muaat, 1 L1Z1X.

[D'rek]

@IH - you swapped SftTs with Tatts, right (wasn't just a one-way exchange)? If yes, need to mark it and add the VP in your updated post.

[Tapper]

I intend to pass when it comes around to me.

[D'rek]

So everyone other than Morgoth is passing, hence Morgoth when you are online feel free to take your turn, put in passes for the rest of us, and take your next turn/pass right after.

[Morgoth]

will do!

[Morgoth]

well, that was an eventful round.

[Tattersail_]

Imperial Historian, on 21 April 2021 - 10:05 PM, said:

Just noticed you've built a space dock in tar'man tatts, that's a little worrying I thought we'd agreed that those border systems would be free of troop build ups so why build a space dock there?

We've swapped SftT so no need to worry. It was the only planet I could attach a spacedock to that has Production. Honestly didn't think build up in the systems near our homeworlds was off the table. I have no designs or intentions of breaking our deal.

[Imperial Historian]

Imperial Historian, on 18 April 2021 - 06:51 PM, said:

If we add into that neither of us builds up significant non-ground forces (ie multiple dreads/carriers) in the systems that are within two systems of each others homeworlds without prior agreement and we don't attack each other (apart from obviously game winning/extending moves)

The relevant part of the deal, building on tar'man is always going to be worse than building on your homeworld for nearly any purpose other than building forces up to attack me, so seems a strange decision for a forward dock rather than a PDS.

The intention of the deal was for both of us to avoid needing to have defensive forces on each others borders in case of a betrayal.

It's done now, but suffice to say I'll be unhappy if you build up a large force on my border as where else am I to assume it's going if not me?

[Imperial Historian]

I have a question regarding secondaries and my commander, when I spend a CT from my strategy pool with my commander I gain a TG, can I spend that TG as part of the secondary or not, eg if I use technology can I use the tg to pay part of the 4 resource cost? I think I can but just double checking.

[Tapper]

Hey Twelve, I plan on moving into Rigel next turn. I only built/brought 2 infantry, I will not invade the tech specialty planet you landed on.

If you move your dread out of the way, I'll trade you my trade agreement as compensation for the CT you spend on the move. Not entirely equal, but hey, you save the dread.

[Imperial Historian]

Tapper, on 22 April 2021 - 06:22 AM, said:

Hey Twelve, I plan on moving into Rigel next turn. I only built/brought 2 infantry, I will not invade the tech specialty planet you landed on.

If you move your dread out of the way, I'll trade you my trade agreement as compensation for the CT you spend on the move. Not entirely equal, but hey, you save the dread.

See twelve someone wants to be your friend!

[Imperial Historian]

Any reason why we can't all post status phase posts out of order since no agendas?

[Tattersail_]

Imperial Historian, on 22 April 2021 - 06:09 AM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 18 April 2021 - 06:51 PM, said:

If we add into that neither of us builds up significant non-ground forces (ie multiple dreads/carriers) in the systems that are within two systems of each others homeworlds without prior agreement and we don't attack each other (apart from obviously game winning/extending moves)

The relevant part of the deal, building on tar'man is always going to be worse than building on your homeworld for nearly any purpose other than building forces up to attack me, so seems a strange decision for a forward dock rather than a PDS.

The intention of the deal was for both of us to avoid needing to have defensive forces on each others borders in case of a betrayal.

It's done now, but suffice to say I'll be unhappy if you build up a large force on my border as where else am I to assume it's going if not me?

Again I built it for two reasons. Reason 1 Objectives. Reason 2 in case anyone tries to blockade my home system next round.

[Tattersail_]

Imperial Historian, on 22 April 2021 - 06:22 AM, said:

I have a question regarding secondaries and my commander, when I spend a CT from my strategy pool with my commander I gain a TG, can I spend that TG as part of the secondary or not, eg if I use technology can I use the tg to pay part of the 4 resource cost? I think I can but just double checking.

I don't think so for the reason to use the secondary you need to be able to afford it. If you have 3 resources for technology then you cannot complete the action of researching.

[Imperial Historian]

Tattersail_, on 22 April 2021 - 07:12 AM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 22 April 2021 - 06:09 AM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 18 April 2021 - 06:51 PM, said:

If we add into that neither of us builds up significant non-ground forces (ie multiple dreads/carriers) in the systems that are within two systems of each others homeworlds without prior agreement and we don't attack each other (apart from obviously game winning/extending moves)

The relevant part of the deal, building on tar'man is always going to be worse than building on your homeworld for nearly any purpose other than building forces up to attack me, so seems a strange decision for a forward dock rather than a PDS.

The intention of the deal was for both of us to avoid needing to have defensive forces on each others borders in case of a betrayal.

It's done now, but suffice to say I'll be unhappy if you build up a large force on my border as where else am I to assume it's going if not me?

Again I built it for two reasons. Reason 1 Objectives. Reason 2 in case anyone tries to blockade my home system next round.

Okay it's done now, I'd appreciate no build up of units there in line with our deal.

[Morgoth]

I agree with IH, and went ahead and did my status update. No surprises there, so feel free to delete it if Blend disagrees.

[Tapper]

Likewise, done. @Morgoth: the agreement is with the function of the Commander, or the status updates?

[Morgoth]

sorry? I don't get your question I think.

[Khellendros]

Morgoth, on 22 April 2021 - 11:47 AM, said:

sorry? I don't get your question I think.

When you said you agree with IH, did you agree with his interpretation of how his Commander should work, or with doing status updates out of order?

I assume the latter.

This post has been edited by Khellendros: 22 April 2021 - 11:54 AM