[twelve]

Now that the agenda phase is upon us after Morgoth finally gets around to posting his update lets get down to business. IH I appreciate you suggesting me for the Strategy card law but I'm more interested in getting paid for my votes. I can offer them to you for debt forgiveness and a trade good or 2.

I'm also 100% taking trade as my pick so I can work my debt forgiveness into that somewhere. I'm offering everyone but Tatts the same stipulations you gave them. With Tatts it will be a 2 tg charge.

I'm also offering up my Racial pn for sale. Get a free secondary. Anyone interested please let me know.

[Imperial Historian]

twelve, on 16 September 2020 - 10:17 PM, said:

Now that the agenda phase is upon us after Morgoth finally gets around to posting his update lets get down to business. IH I appreciate you suggesting me for the Strategy card law but I'm more interested in getting paid for my votes. I can offer them to you for debt forgiveness and a trade good or 2.

I'm also 100% taking trade as my pick so I can work my debt forgiveness into that somewhere. I'm offering everyone but Tatts the same stipulations you gave them. With Tatts it will be a 2 tg charge.

I'm also offering up my Racial pn for sale. Get a free secondary. Anyone interested please let me know.

For 4 votes? Sorry not interested.

[twelve]

Imperial Historian, on 16 September 2020 - 10:25 PM, said:

twelve, on 16 September 2020 - 10:17 PM, said:

Now that the agenda phase is upon us after Morgoth finally gets around to posting his update lets get down to business. IH I appreciate you suggesting me for the Strategy card law but I'm more interested in getting paid for my votes. I can offer them to you for debt forgiveness and a trade good or 2.

I'm also 100% taking trade as my pick so I can work my debt forgiveness into that somewhere. I'm offering everyone but Tatts the same stipulations you gave them. With Tatts it will be a 2 tg charge.

I'm also offering up my Racial pn for sale. Get a free secondary. Anyone interested please let me know.

For 4 votes? Sorry not interested.

My contribution to an agenda is more than meets the eye.

[Tattersail_]

You may have had a better time offering the same deal as IH and I may have taken you up on it. Re: trade

Plus if you are taking trade then your racial would only be worth 1tg to others at a max. I think you owe Blend a free refresh so you're only talking to the rest.

[twelve]

Tattersail_, on 17 September 2020 - 05:47 AM, said:

You may have had a better time offering the same deal as IH and I may have taken you up on it. Re: trade

Plus if you are taking trade then your racial would only be worth 1tg to others at a max. I think you owe Blend a free refresh so you're only talking to the rest.

My racial doesnt have to be used on trade and no I dont owe Blend a free refresh as the deal for mine round 1 was for me to move to him as my cost so he could swap commodities.

[Morgoth]

twelve, on 16 September 2020 - 10:17 PM, said:

Now that the agenda phase is upon us after Morgoth finally gets around to posting his update lets get down to business. IH I appreciate you suggesting me for the Strategy card law but I'm more interested in getting paid for my votes. I can offer them to you for debt forgiveness and a trade good or 2.

I'm also 100% taking trade as my pick so I can work my debt forgiveness into that somewhere. I'm offering everyone but Tatts the same stipulations you gave them. With Tatts it will be a 2 tg charge.

I'm also offering up my Racial pn for sale. Get a free secondary. Anyone interested please let me know.

I go to bed around 11 pm my time.

I hope that the good relationship we're fostering leads to a free refresh on my part, and would be happy to do a 3:3 trade.

[Tattersail_]

Votes as they stand;

Tattersail - 17
IH - 8
Blend - 12
Twelve - 4
Morgoth - 15

[Tattersail_]

Imperial Historian, on 16 September 2020 - 04:49 PM, said:

I don't have any strong feelings on these agendas, and my votes could be purchased. The FOR vote on the fleet CT seems to favour the naalu a lot so in principle I am against it.

I think from this and your next post you do really care about this agenda.

It doesn't affect Blend, Morgoth or I but it does you. You're building destroyers to defeat fighters but they take a space away from your lower hitting ships like dreads. Having 5 or more fleet supply will help you more than everyone in the long run.

So I'd be in favour of this.

What do you think Blend? He mentions you in his post.

[Blend]

Tattersail_, on 17 September 2020 - 07:17 AM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 16 September 2020 - 04:49 PM, said:

I don't have any strong feelings on these agendas, and my votes could be purchased. The FOR vote on the fleet CT seems to favour the naalu a lot so in principle I am against it.

I think from this and your next post you do really care about this agenda.

It doesn't affect Blend, Morgoth or I but it does you. You're building destroyers to defeat fighters but they take a space away from your lower hitting ships like dreads. Having 5 or more fleet supply will help you more than everyone in the long run.

So I'd be in favour of this.

What do you think Blend? He mentions you in his post.

Definitely think we should be capping fleet at 4, but I don't care enough to buy votes.

I wouldn't mind being elected for Arbiter. Very interested to know where Morgoth stands on these agendas.

[Imperial Historian]

If you guys want to cap fleets at 4 go ahead. Just bear in mind that means anyone attacking blend is capped at 3. My fleets will be powerful enough regardless.

Also being able to ensure getting any agenda, while also being first is almost guaranteeing an imperial naalu play resulting in a win.

[Morgoth]

I am not a fan of small fleets, even though my own is relatively meager at the moment.

[Blend]

Morgoth, on 17 September 2020 - 12:57 PM, said:

I am not a fan of small fleets, even though my own is relatively meager at the moment.

If you pledge your votes on me for Arbiter, I'll put my votes on AGAINST for Fleet cap 4. As I said, I don't care enough about it to really care which way it goes, but I'd like to have Arbiter in my tool box.

Of course, this will all depend on where Tatts wants to go, and what he may offer me to go one way or another on either agenda. His 17 votes are no joke.

[twelve]

Morgoth, on 17 September 2020 - 06:21 AM, said:

twelve, on 16 September 2020 - 10:17 PM, said:

Now that the agenda phase is upon us after Morgoth finally gets around to posting his update lets get down to business. IH I appreciate you suggesting me for the Strategy card law but I'm more interested in getting paid for my votes. I can offer them to you for debt forgiveness and a trade good or 2.

I'm also 100% taking trade as my pick so I can work my debt forgiveness into that somewhere. I'm offering everyone but Tatts the same stipulations you gave them. With Tatts it will be a 2 tg charge.

I'm also offering up my Racial pn for sale. Get a free secondary. Anyone interested please let me know.

I go to bed around 11 pm my time.

I hope that the good relationship we're fostering leads to a free refresh on my part, and would be happy to do a 3:3 trade.

Good relations or not. I dont have any planets to score objectives so I'm insisting on the same terms as IH had last round. Else I have no chance of scoring points.

[twelve]

Blend, on 17 September 2020 - 01:14 PM, said:

Morgoth, on 17 September 2020 - 12:57 PM, said:

I am not a fan of small fleets, even though my own is relatively meager at the moment.

If you pledge your votes on me for Arbiter, I'll put my votes on AGAINST for Fleet cap 4. As I said, I don't care enough about it to really care which way it goes, but I'd like to have Arbiter in my tool box.

Of course, this will all depend on where Tatts wants to go, and what he may offer me to go one way or another on either agenda. His 17 votes are no joke.

The 17 votes are your and IH's fault you know. He has taken 10 votes off me this game.

[twelve]

Anyone who wants to overtake Tatts in the arbiter vote I'll take 1 Tg just to vote your way or your trade agreement pn only if you win the election.

[Blend]

twelve, on 17 September 2020 - 01:32 PM, said:

Blend, on 17 September 2020 - 01:14 PM, said:

Morgoth, on 17 September 2020 - 12:57 PM, said:

I am not a fan of small fleets, even though my own is relatively meager at the moment.

If you pledge your votes on me for Arbiter, I'll put my votes on AGAINST for Fleet cap 4. As I said, I don't care enough about it to really care which way it goes, but I'd like to have Arbiter in my tool box.

Of course, this will all depend on where Tatts wants to go, and what he may offer me to go one way or another on either agenda. His 17 votes are no joke.

The 17 votes are your and IH's fault you know. He has taken 10 votes off me this game.

Gosh - still whining eh? So far Tatts and I have had a good neighbourly relations. I have no interest in that changing right now. You're right, I COULD have made Tatts pay for going after you the way he did, but why would I ever do that when he's leaving me alone?

[twelve]

Always

[Tattersail_]

I think this is first game I've occupied MR. I've not exhausted it and I don't plan on taking Imperial as that will paint a target on my back.

Twelve you had 2 VPs and took Imperial and if I didn't do what I did youd have 4 or 5 now.

I'm still on less VP than you.

Blend are you set on needing your racial next round? I'll vote you for that strategy law.

[Tattersail_]

By the by I won't be taking Imoerial to score 3 points

[Blend]

Tattersail_, on 17 September 2020 - 03:52 PM, said:

I think this is first game I've occupied MR. I've not exhausted it and I don't plan on taking Imperial as that will paint a target on my back.

Twelve you had 2 VPs and took Imperial and if I didn't do what I did youd have 4 or 5 now.

I'm still on less VP than you.

Blend are you set on needing your racial next round? I'll vote you for that strategy law.

I would be willing to give you my racial in exchange for your votes on me for the Arbiter agenda.