[Hanas]

Skintick, on 12 May 2020 - 01:38 AM, said:

Aranatha, on 12 May 2020 - 01:33 AM, said:

Skintick, on 12 May 2020 - 12:43 AM, said:

Thyrllan, on 11 May 2020 - 11:47 PM, said:

Prazec looks like he's really getting it on with that rock. Sheltatha looks like he's hiding something naughty under his rock.

Shelly is a girl. You, sir/ma'am/warren-thing are an imposter!




Vote Thyrllan

Did you just assume their gender? I'm shocked I tell ya, Shocked!

Malazan canon sez Sheltaha Lore is female.
When we are referring to avatars that correspond to book characters, I expect people on the book forum to use the appropriate pronouns, unless the player has been alted.

Tell that to Orfantal

[Kalse]

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 06:19 AM, said:

Kalse, on 12 May 2020 - 05:47 AM, said:

Okral Lom, on 12 May 2020 - 03:54 AM, said:

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 02:16 AM, said:

Sometimes being the bear minimum is enough. (sorry,not sorry)

No matter what happens, you've already won.

vote Galt

That joke is not good enough, revealing the obvious symp-signaling

WIFOMisms aside I appreciate your eagerness.

[rebuttal]
I am not signaling. I just like puns.
[/rebuttal]

I was referring to Okral's post

[Sheltatha Lore]

Kalse, on 12 May 2020 - 05:47 AM, said:

Okral Lom, on 12 May 2020 - 03:54 AM, said:

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 02:16 AM, said:

Sometimes being the bear minimum is enough. (sorry,not sorry)

No matter what happens, you've already won.

vote Galt

That joke is not good enough, revealing the obvious symp-signaling

remove vote


Vote Kalse


Voting the symp for suspected "symp-signaling" would be pointless. If he is symping you should be voting for the person he is symping... not the symp.

Rookie mistake?...rusty?...or projecting?

[Merrid]

Sheltatha Lore, on 12 May 2020 - 08:15 AM, said:

Kalse, on 12 May 2020 - 05:47 AM, said:

Okral Lom, on 12 May 2020 - 03:54 AM, said:

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 02:16 AM, said:

Sometimes being the bear minimum is enough. (sorry,not sorry)

No matter what happens, you've already won.

vote Galt

That joke is not good enough, revealing the obvious symp-signaling

remove vote


Vote Kalse


Voting the symp for suspected "symp-signaling" would be pointless. If he is symping you should be voting for the person he is symping... not the symp.

Rookie mistake?...rusty?...or projecting?

Erm, but they did vote for the person ‘being signalled.’

[Sheltatha Lore]

Merrid, on 12 May 2020 - 08:18 AM, said:

Sheltatha Lore, on 12 May 2020 - 08:15 AM, said:

Kalse, on 12 May 2020 - 05:47 AM, said:

Okral Lom, on 12 May 2020 - 03:54 AM, said:

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 02:16 AM, said:

Sometimes being the bear minimum is enough. (sorry,not sorry)

No matter what happens, you've already won.

vote Galt

That joke is not good enough, revealing the obvious symp-signaling

remove vote


Vote Kalse


Voting the symp for suspected "symp-signaling" would be pointless. If he is symping you should be voting for the person he is symping... not the symp.

Rookie mistake?...rusty?...or projecting?

Erm, but they did vote for the person 'being signalled.'

oops, I read that interaction wrong.

remove vote

[Sheltatha Lore]

Ill stick my vote back to

Vote Thyrllan


his opening post still seemed a bit "trying very hard to be normal" to me.

[Gait]

Kalse, on 12 May 2020 - 06:55 AM, said:

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 06:19 AM, said:

Kalse, on 12 May 2020 - 05:47 AM, said:

Okral Lom, on 12 May 2020 - 03:54 AM, said:

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 02:16 AM, said:

Sometimes being the bear minimum is enough. (sorry,not sorry)

No matter what happens, you've already won.

vote Galt

That joke is not good enough, revealing the obvious symp-signaling

WIFOMisms aside I appreciate your eagerness.

[rebuttal]
I am not signaling. I just like puns.
[/rebuttal]

I was referring to Okral's post

Oh I see. I'd suggest he/she/they might just like puns also?

Don't take my word for it. Do as you like.

Shelly seems a bit all over the place, too eager imho.

[Tennes]

Speaking of eager:

Skintick, on 12 May 2020 - 01:38 AM, said:

Aranatha, on 12 May 2020 - 01:33 AM, said:

Skintick, on 12 May 2020 - 12:43 AM, said:

Thyrllan, on 11 May 2020 - 11:47 PM, said:

Prazec looks like he's really getting it on with that rock. Sheltatha looks like he's hiding something naughty under his rock.

Shelly is a girl. You, sir/ma'am/warren-thing are an imposter!




Vote Thyrllan

Did you just assume their gender? I'm shocked I tell ya, Shocked!

Malazan canon sez Sheltaha Lore is female.
When we are referring to avatars that correspond to book characters, I expect people on the book forum to use the appropriate pronouns, unless the player has been alted.

Kinda weird how after a completely benign joke Skintick feels the need to explain themselves all seriously. Let's throw it at the wall and see if it sticks.

Vote Skintick

[Barghast]

Merrid, on 12 May 2020 - 08:18 AM, said:

Sheltatha Lore, on 12 May 2020 - 08:15 AM, said:

Kalse, on 12 May 2020 - 05:47 AM, said:

Okral Lom, on 12 May 2020 - 03:54 AM, said:

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 02:16 AM, said:

Sometimes being the bear minimum is enough. (sorry,not sorry)

No matter what happens, you've already won.

vote Galt

That joke is not good enough, revealing the obvious symp-signaling

remove vote


Vote Kalse


Voting the symp for suspected "symp-signaling" would be pointless. If he is symping you should be voting for the person he is symping... not the symp.

Rookie mistake?...rusty?...or projecting?

Erm, but they did vote for the person ‘being signalled.’

Also interesting that the person voted for 'being signalled' made the same mistake, eager to rebute a misunderstood claim while completely overlooking the nonsensity of the act of voting an imagined symp

[Gait]

Barghast, on 12 May 2020 - 10:05 AM, said:

Merrid, on 12 May 2020 - 08:18 AM, said:

Sheltatha Lore, on 12 May 2020 - 08:15 AM, said:

Kalse, on 12 May 2020 - 05:47 AM, said:

Okral Lom, on 12 May 2020 - 03:54 AM, said:

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 02:16 AM, said:

Sometimes being the bear minimum is enough. (sorry,not sorry)

No matter what happens, you've already won.

vote Galt

That joke is not good enough, revealing the obvious symp-signaling

remove vote


Vote Kalse


Voting the symp for suspected "symp-signaling" would be pointless. If he is symping you should be voting for the person he is symping... not the symp.

Rookie mistake?...rusty?...or projecting?

Erm, but they did vote for the person ‘being signalled.’

Also interesting that the person voted for 'being signalled' made the same mistake, eager to rebute a misunderstood claim while completely overlooking the nonsensity of the act of voting an imagined symp

Well I personally didn't understand Kalses wording, at that point a joke was a joke was a joke. I didn't actively "overlook" anything as you put it there. Just felt it was piling speculation on top of speculation.

Kalse was kind enough to explain his/her meaning. I can see why the vote was made.

[Barghast]

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 10:31 AM, said:

I didn't actively "overlook" anything as you put it there.

I didn't say it was active or intentional

[Rikkter]

Definitely not first. Hey-o all.

[Osseric]

I had family over all day on Monday. I'm checking in.

[Kalse]

Barghast, on 12 May 2020 - 11:06 AM, said:

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 10:31 AM, said:

I didn't actively "overlook" anything as you put it there.

I didn't say it was active or intentional

Lots of awkward knee-jerkiness around my semi-joke vote. I'll keep it there for now, while other are checking in (and hopefully doing more than that, unlike the last two posts)

[Skintick]

Morning everyone!

[Sheltatha Lore]

Kalse, on 12 May 2020 - 12:57 PM, said:

Barghast, on 12 May 2020 - 11:06 AM, said:

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 10:31 AM, said:

I didn't actively "overlook" anything as you put it there.

I didn't say it was active or intentional

Lots of awkward knee-jerkiness around my semi-joke vote. I'll keep it there for now, while other are checking in (and hopefully doing more than that, unlike the last two posts)

Agreed, but its more "needlessly defensive" than knee-jerky if you ask me.

Could be something there I guess.

[Kalse]

Sheltatha Lore, on 12 May 2020 - 01:09 PM, said:

Kalse, on 12 May 2020 - 12:57 PM, said:

Barghast, on 12 May 2020 - 11:06 AM, said:

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 10:31 AM, said:

I didn't actively "overlook" anything as you put it there.

I didn't say it was active or intentional

Lots of awkward knee-jerkiness around my semi-joke vote. I'll keep it there for now, while other are checking in (and hopefully doing more than that, unlike the last two posts)

Agreed, but its more "needlessly defensive" than knee-jerky if you ask me.

Could be something there I guess.

You're included in my statement

[Skintick]

Hanas, on 12 May 2020 - 06:24 AM, said:

Skintick, on 12 May 2020 - 01:38 AM, said:

Aranatha, on 12 May 2020 - 01:33 AM, said:

Skintick, on 12 May 2020 - 12:43 AM, said:

Thyrllan, on 11 May 2020 - 11:47 PM, said:

Prazec looks like he's really getting it on with that rock. Sheltatha looks like he's hiding something naughty under his rock.

Shelly is a girl. You, sir/ma'am/warren-thing are an imposter!




Vote Thyrllan

Did you just assume their gender? I'm shocked I tell ya, Shocked!

Malazan canon sez Sheltaha Lore is female.
When we are referring to avatars that correspond to book characters, I expect people on the book forum to use the appropriate pronouns, unless the player has been alted.

Tell that to Orfantal

I don't think we have an Orfanal mafia alt (there also used to be a member with that username, way back when), so we don't have to worry about them.

[Skintick]

Osseric, on 12 May 2020 - 12:05 PM, said:

I had family over all day on Monday. I'm checking in.

errr.... isn't that, like, violation of lockdown?

[Gait]

Sheltatha Lore, on 12 May 2020 - 01:09 PM, said:

Kalse, on 12 May 2020 - 12:57 PM, said:

Barghast, on 12 May 2020 - 11:06 AM, said:

Gait, on 12 May 2020 - 10:31 AM, said:

I didn't actively "overlook" anything as you put it there.

I didn't say it was active or intentional

Lots of awkward knee-jerkiness around my semi-joke vote. I'll keep it there for now, while other are checking in (and hopefully doing more than that, unlike the last two posts)

Agreed, but its more "needlessly defensive" than knee-jerky if you ask me.

Could be something there I guess.

Could you explain what you mean by "needlessly defensive"?

Also hello latecomers, welcome to the game.