Malazan Empire: Twilight Imperium (Game 3) - Chat Thread - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 242 Pages +
  • « First
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Twilight Imperium (Game 3) - Chat Thread

#981 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:11 PM

View PostGnaw, on 12 February 2019 - 04:09 PM, said:

I’m curious why we’re having this argument now. I bet I can go back and find ten examples of this secondary being moved offensively to move fighters and or infantry.



I bet you can't :)
0

#982 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:14 PM

In other news, Reactor Meltdown has been sabotaged.
0

#983 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:15 PM

View PostGnaw, on 12 February 2019 - 04:07 PM, said:

We are not happy with fighters but not infantry considering our flagship’s ability.


I am definitely not going to allow infantry to be picked up off of planets before moving.
0

#984 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,245
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:17 PM

View PostGalactic Council, on 12 February 2019 - 04:14 PM, said:

In other news, Reactor Meltdown has been sabotaged.


Does this mean it is still D'rek's turn?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#985 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:20 PM

View PostTattersail_, on 12 February 2019 - 04:17 PM, said:

View PostGalactic Council, on 12 February 2019 - 04:14 PM, said:

In other news, Reactor Meltdown has been sabotaged.


Does this mean it is still D'rek's turn?


Nope, Macaw's turn.
0

#986 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:20 PM

View PostTattersail_, on 12 February 2019 - 04:17 PM, said:

View PostGalactic Council, on 12 February 2019 - 04:14 PM, said:

In other news, Reactor Meltdown has been sabotaged.


Does this mean it is still D'rek's turn?


Yep
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#987 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,245
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:24 PM

View PostGalactic Council, on 12 February 2019 - 04:20 PM, said:

View PostTattersail_, on 12 February 2019 - 04:17 PM, said:

View PostGalactic Council, on 12 February 2019 - 04:14 PM, said:

In other news, Reactor Meltdown has been sabotaged.


Does this mean it is still D'rek's turn?


Nope, Macaw's turn.


Her card was sabotaged so she never did an action...
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#988 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:26 PM

Ugh, doesn't it just cancel the effect? I mean, that AC is now gone from her hand, so she played it, so it was an action, it just didn't have the desired effect?
0

#989 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:28 PM

Ah sorry, if a COMPONENT ACTION is cancelled, then that player goes again.

So yes, D'rek's turn again.

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 12 February 2019 - 04:28 PM

0

#990 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,245
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:28 PM

View PostGalactic Council, on 12 February 2019 - 04:26 PM, said:

Ugh, doesn't it just cancel the effect? I mean, that AC is now gone from her hand, so she played it, so it was an action, it just didn't have the desired effect?


Because it was sabotaged she never played an action, it's what we've been playing. Happened last game I think.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#991 User is offline   Gnaw 

  • Recovering eating disordered addict of HHM
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 5,966
  • Joined: 16-June 12

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:29 PM

View PostGalactic Council, on 12 February 2019 - 04:26 PM, said:

Ugh, doesn't it just cancel the effect? I mean, that AC is now gone from her hand, so she played it, so it was an action, it just didn't have the desired effect?


Now there I agree with you. And the way we’ve been playing is that a sabotaged component action cancels the actionnot just the effect. So, still her turn.
"Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom." - Viktor Frankl
0

#992 User is offline   twelve 

  • Master of the Deck
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 9,149
  • Joined: 27-March 09
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:43 PM

View PostGalactic Council, on 12 February 2019 - 04:26 PM, said:

Ugh, doesn't it just cancel the effect? I mean, that AC is now gone from her hand, so she played it, so it was an action, it just didn't have the desired effect?

It should but I had this same issue come up in game one. It does require D'rek to post another action.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
0

#993 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:47 PM

It seems odd to me that you get another go if a component action AC is cancelled, but if you use it as part of a tactical action (say, Flank Speed), it is not, even if it means you can no longer do that action (e.g. reach a certain system) and you lose your CT. One seems way more punishing than the other. Perhaps someone knows the answer to why this is?
0

#994 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,600
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:51 PM

I request to know who has sabotaged it, not just "it has been sabotaged" nvm

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#995 User is offline   Blend 

  • Gentleman of High House Mafia
  • View gallery
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 4,579
  • Joined: 28-March 03
  • Location:Ottawa

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:52 PM

View PostD, on 12 February 2019 - 04:51 PM, said:

I request to know who has sabotaged it, not just "it has been sabotaged"


I mean, it's probably Macaw.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
0

#996 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,600
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:53 PM

View PostBlend, on 12 February 2019 - 04:52 PM, said:

View PostD, on 12 February 2019 - 04:51 PM, said:

I request to know who has sabotaged it, not just "it has been sabotaged"


I mean, it's probably Macaw.


Yes, but I wanted to be sure. Anyways, I see it now says above the quote.

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

#997 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,245
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 12 February 2019 - 04:57 PM

Now it is Gnaw's turn. Lucky to have a sabotage so early in the game.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#998 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 12 February 2019 - 05:13 PM

View PostD, on 12 February 2019 - 04:53 PM, said:

View PostBlend, on 12 February 2019 - 04:52 PM, said:

View PostD, on 12 February 2019 - 04:51 PM, said:

I request to know who has sabotaged it, not just "it has been sabotaged"


I mean, it's probably Macaw.


Yes, but I wanted to be sure. Anyways, I see it now says above the quote.


It always did :)
0

#999 User is offline   Galactic Council 

  • God
  • Group: Game Mod
  • Posts: 4,983
  • Joined: 30-April 13

Posted 12 February 2019 - 05:14 PM

Just approximately ten more games and I reckon I'm gonna have the rules down like nobody's business!
0

#1000 User is offline   D'rek 

  • Consort of High House Mafia
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 14,600
  • Joined: 08-August 07
  • Location::

Posted 12 February 2019 - 05:17 PM

View PostGalactic Council, on 12 February 2019 - 05:13 PM, said:

View PostD, on 12 February 2019 - 04:53 PM, said:

View PostBlend, on 12 February 2019 - 04:52 PM, said:

View PostD, on 12 February 2019 - 04:51 PM, said:

I request to know who has sabotaged it, not just "it has been sabotaged"


I mean, it's probably Macaw.


Yes, but I wanted to be sure. Anyways, I see it now says above the quote.


It always did :)


The wording below it mislead me okaaaaaay

View Postworrywort, on 14 September 2012 - 08:07 PM, said:

I kinda love it when D'rek unleashes her nerd wrath, as I knew she would here. Sorry innocent bystanders, but someone's gotta be the kindling.
0

Share this topic:


  • 242 Pages +
  • « First
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users