[Imperial Historian]

Tattersail_, on 20 February 2019 - 09:14 AM, said:

Morgoth, on 20 February 2019 - 09:09 AM, said:

Tattersail_, on 20 February 2019 - 09:05 AM, said:

Imperial Historian, on 20 February 2019 - 08:55 AM, said:

You are misunderstanding, I was offering the option to play that card for you on my first turn and stop d'rek moving into bereg, you don't have to play it yourself, with the added benefit of delaying construction a turn. I know you probably wouldn't be able to pay for it with TG, or use it yourself but you have PNs.

2TG for your sftt, and no blocking the wormhole I will accept. I will not pillage this trade.

Okay that's a deal.

In terms of Bereg, I have nothing to offer you to do that right now.

If D'rek attacks Arnor/Lor on her first turn then I'd pay you to use that action card. If she doesn't then i'll move my ships from Bereg back towards my territory through the rift.

Hopefully I can negotiate some sort of peace with the Universities as we Sol are all for the education.

Why would you need to negotiate anything? You are Sol. You are all but impossible to dislodge from a planet if you decide to hold it.

I know I can be aggressive but that'd affect my VP gathering and chances of winning. No point in me attacking her if it does not gain me anything.

I think perhaps we are playing a different game but okay. I fully expect d'reks first move to be to retake bereg and build.

And tatts, in my view the sol gather VP by being aggressive.

[Galactic Council]

@ Morgoth:

I have your CTs at 1/1/2, but you have 0/1/1 listed in your post?

This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 20 February 2019 - 09:48 AM

[Morgoth]

Galactic Council, on 20 February 2019 - 09:48 AM, said:

@ Morgoth:

I have your CTs at 1/1/2, but you have 0/1/1 listed in your post?

I saw it too and fixed it. I had forgotten to update in the status update.

[Galactic Council]

Morgoth, on 20 February 2019 - 09:50 AM, said:

Galactic Council, on 20 February 2019 - 09:48 AM, said:

@ Morgoth:

I have your CTs at 1/1/2, but you have 0/1/1 listed in your post?

I saw it too and fixed it. I had forgotten to update in the status update.

Coolio.

[Morgoth]

I am very fond of that fleet supply power of the Letnev I have to say.

[Tattersail_]

D'rek if you give me a free refresh I will return the favour when I get trade

[Tattersail_]

Morgoth, on 20 February 2019 - 10:03 AM, said:

I am very fond of that fleet supply power of the Letnev I have to say.

It does look great

[Imperial Historian]

Tattersail_, on 20 February 2019 - 10:20 AM, said:

D'rek if you give me a free refresh I will return the favour when I get trade

I think you might be flogging a dead horse there Tatts

[Tattersail_]

Imperial Historian, on 20 February 2019 - 11:21 AM, said:

Tattersail_, on 20 February 2019 - 10:20 AM, said:

D'rek if you give me a free refresh I will return the favour when I get trade

I think you might be flogging a dead horse there Tatts

Haha, if you don't ask you don't get.

[D'rek]

Action posted. No time to read the chat thread in full, sorry.

[Gnaw]

Tapper, you still ok with using technology this turn?

[Gnaw]

Tapper is up.

Oh. First flagship is worth a VP right?

This post has been edited by Gnaw: 20 February 2019 - 06:28 PM

[Gnaw]

Morgoth, any chance you'd consider sending that Speaker token this far back in the line. I'm perfectly willing to give you your choice of card and willing to wager that Tapper and Nom would also.

Edit: btw, I thought you were going to give me a TG? 😁

This post has been edited by Gnaw: 20 February 2019 - 08:26 PM

[twelve]

Gnaw what do you have planned with that flagship of yours?

[Gnaw]

twelve, on 20 February 2019 - 08:05 PM, said:

Gnaw what do you have planned with that flagship of yours?

For this round it seemed like the best way to defend my forward base. I'm not going to make the mistake of having Everra be that position.

This round for me looks a lot like simply consolidating what I already hold. Future rounds? Don't know. Gravity drive and Light/Wave Deflector would help a lot with that decision. Do I have my eye on MR? Maybe. I've already got a big enough target on my back however and you sitting on MR allows you to share that target.


Edit: damn. GC spent some time online. Wonder if he noticed that he had a combat to resolve?

This post has been edited by Gnaw: 20 February 2019 - 08:23 PM

[Gnaw]

IH I’m sure this is a case of “if I have to ask I can’t afford it”: what would it cost me for you to attack Gwynan with that cruiser from Tar’mann?

[D'rek]

Gnaw, on 20 February 2019 - 08:19 PM, said:

Edit: damn. GC spent some time online. Wonder if he noticed that he had a combat to resolve?

And a PDS pot shot at some Nekro ships

[Gnaw]

D, on 20 February 2019 - 08:28 PM, said:

Gnaw, on 20 February 2019 - 08:19 PM, said:

Edit: damn. GC spent some time online. Wonder if he noticed that he had a combat to resolve?

And a PDS pot shot at some Nekro ships

Just another reason why I wish Morgy or Twelve would make you go away.

This post has been edited by Gnaw: 20 February 2019 - 08:31 PM

[D'rek]

Gnaw, on 20 February 2019 - 08:30 PM, said:

D, on 20 February 2019 - 08:28 PM, said:

Gnaw, on 20 February 2019 - 08:19 PM, said:

Edit: damn. GC spent some time online. Wonder if he noticed that he had a combat to resolve?

And a PDS pot shot at some Nekro ships

Just another reason why I wish Morgy or Twelve would make you go away.

You can still pay me not to do it. Standard fees apply

[Galactic Council]

D, on 20 February 2019 - 08:28 PM, said:

Gnaw, on 20 February 2019 - 08:19 PM, said:

Edit: damn. GC spent some time online. Wonder if he noticed that he had a combat to resolve?

And a PDS pot shot at some Nekro ships

Stop spying on me! Yes, I did notice, but I was actually stuck in traffic and surreptitiously checking my phone. I’m still out so will be a while. I also have Tapper’s provisional so will post that too when I get back.