[Tattersail_]

I'm going to pass when it comes round to me.

[Tattersail_]

Tapper, on 18 July 2018 - 03:58 AM, said:

Owww fuck. I didn't see Tatts played Construction.

Gnaw, on 18 July 2018 - 04:56 AM, said:

Tapper, on 18 July 2018 - 03:58 AM, said:

Owww fuck. I didn't see Tatts played Construction.

I suspected someone missed that. He didn't separate his secondaries from his action very well. Accident or purposeful? Hmm. We'll never know...

I put all my actions on separate lines. What could/should I have done differently?

[Khellendros]

Tattersail_, on 18 July 2018 - 07:44 AM, said:

Tapper, on 18 July 2018 - 03:58 AM, said:

Owww fuck. I didn't see Tatts played Construction.

Gnaw, on 18 July 2018 - 04:56 AM, said:

Tapper, on 18 July 2018 - 03:58 AM, said:

Owww fuck. I didn't see Tatts played Construction.

I suspected someone missed that. He didn't separate his secondaries from his action very well. Accident or purposeful? Hmm. We'll never know...

I put all my actions on separate lines. What could/should I have done differently?

Copy my style, it's the best

I was actually looking out for construction too as I was considering building a second factory, but decided not to in the end. However, when I posted my move I did actually forget you had used construction (and went back and edited my post to reflect I wouldn't be using it after I realised), so there was something about your post that made it forgettable.

[Tapper]

Tattersail_, on 18 July 2018 - 07:44 AM, said:

Tapper, on 18 July 2018 - 03:58 AM, said:

Owww fuck. I didn't see Tatts played Construction.

Gnaw, on 18 July 2018 - 04:56 AM, said:

Tapper, on 18 July 2018 - 03:58 AM, said:

Owww fuck. I didn't see Tatts played Construction.

I suspected someone missed that. He didn't separate his secondaries from his action very well. Accident or purposeful? Hmm. We'll never know...

I put all my actions on separate lines. What could/should I have done differently?

It's sort of under the header Secondaries in your post.

Putting the main action of a turn between hard breaks and/or prefacing it with bold/ all caps STRATEGIC would give it a bit more oomph

Don't worry, not too much harm done. I would have liked a Dock on T/T this turn but I can always do that later and it's my fault I missed it.

[Tattersail_]

Khellendros, on 18 July 2018 - 07:56 AM, said:

Tattersail_, on 18 July 2018 - 07:44 AM, said:

Tapper, on 18 July 2018 - 03:58 AM, said:

Owww fuck. I didn't see Tatts played Construction.

Gnaw, on 18 July 2018 - 04:56 AM, said:

Tapper, on 18 July 2018 - 03:58 AM, said:

Owww fuck. I didn't see Tatts played Construction.

I suspected someone missed that. He didn't separate his secondaries from his action very well. Accident or purposeful? Hmm. We'll never know...

I put all my actions on separate lines. What could/should I have done differently?

Copy my style, it's the best

I was actually looking out for construction too as I was considering building a second factory, but decided not to in the end. However, when I posted my move I did actually forget you had used construction (and went back and edited my post to reflect I wouldn't be using it after I realised), so there was something about your post that made it forgettable.

When I come to my turn I'll have what I want to do drafted up in my inbox then i'll read through everyone's actions to see who has done what even though I am reading up on them as they post them anyway. No surprises then, but I understand people may not have the time to do that.

[Tattersail_]

Tapper, on 18 July 2018 - 08:02 AM, said:

Tattersail_, on 18 July 2018 - 07:44 AM, said:

Tapper, on 18 July 2018 - 03:58 AM, said:

Owww fuck. I didn't see Tatts played Construction.

Gnaw, on 18 July 2018 - 04:56 AM, said:

Tapper, on 18 July 2018 - 03:58 AM, said:

Owww fuck. I didn't see Tatts played Construction.

I suspected someone missed that. He didn't separate his secondaries from his action very well. Accident or purposeful? Hmm. We'll never know...

I put all my actions on separate lines. What could/should I have done differently?

It's sort of under the header Secondaries in your post.

Putting the main action of a turn between hard breaks and/or prefacing it with bold/ all caps STRATEGIC would give it a bit more oomph

Don't worry, not too much harm done. I would have liked a Dock on T/T this turn but I can always do that later and it's my fault I missed it.

Gotcha, I'll do my best to emphasise in the future *Thumbsup*

[Tapper]

I usually reply to my previous action, to have the banner, numbers and formatting consistent. Especially on the phone that is the best way to make these complex posts for me, but looking up other posts is near impossible that way on the phone (like now )

[Tattersail_]

Anyone having problems opening the map in a new tab, or viewing image?

[Tapper]

Tatts, Gnaw, I have 1 spare commodity available, either now or at the start of next turn (before Trade is played). Keep it in mind.

[Itwæs Nom]

Itwæs Nom, on 18 July 2018 - 02:40 AM, said:

Guess this is what I get for complaining about negotiations

Talk about surprises

Well just found out where exactly the other alpha wormhole is, def makes your action more understandable
Still open to negotiations regarding the pity lives of my advance cruiser crews

[Tattersail_]

Tapper, on 18 July 2018 - 08:43 AM, said:

Tatts, Gnaw, I have 1 spare commodity available, either now or at the start of next turn (before Trade is played). Keep it in mind.

At present I do not have any until I refresh. I would've done you a 1 TG for 1 Commodity if you got there before Gnaw, by the looks of things he only needed 3 TG, the 1 TG destroyer was a bonus.

[Khellendros]

@ Tapper:

Okay, so: I'm going to invade Tequran-Torkan, destroy your ships and infantry and take the planets. Or on the other hand you pay me off. I would get 2TGs from the planets through scavenge, one of the planets is worth another two resources, and the other is worth a command token, or 3TGs. So I'm asking for 3TGs now (or your commodity and 2TGs), and your Trading Agreement PN, with a promise to refresh next round, even if you don't get a free refresh.

[Imperial Historian]

Ooh!

[Imperial Historian]

I will pass when it gets round to me

[Itwæs Nom]

Hacan should be at 1VP methinks

[Gnaw]

Khellendros, on 18 July 2018 - 09:28 AM, said:

@ Tapper:

Okay, so: I'm going to invade Tequran-Torkan, destroy your ships and infantry and take the planets. Or on the other hand you pay me off. I would get 2TGs from the planets through scavenge, one of the planets is worth another two resources, and the other is worth a command token, or 3TGs. So I'm asking for 3TGs now (or your commodity and 2TGs), and your Trading Agreement PN, with a promise to refresh next round, even if you don't get a free refresh.

As I said, lots more blood this game.

[Itwæs Nom]

Gnaw, on 18 July 2018 - 09:43 AM, said:

Khellendros, on 18 July 2018 - 09:28 AM, said:

@ Tapper:

Okay, so: I'm going to invade Tequran-Torkan, destroy your ships and infantry and take the planets. Or on the other hand you pay me off. I would get 2TGs from the planets through scavenge, one of the planets is worth another two resources, and the other is worth a command token, or 3TGs. So I'm asking for 3TGs now (or your commodity and 2TGs), and your Trading Agreement PN, with a promise to refresh next round, even if you don't get a free refresh.

As I said, lots more blood this game.

Speaking about blood...

[Tattersail_]

Itwæs Nom, on 18 July 2018 - 09:43 AM, said:

Hacan should be at 1VP methinks

Yes but I couldn't edit it in as Bend posted my provisional.

[Tattersail_]

Khellendros, on 18 July 2018 - 09:28 AM, said:

@ Tapper:

Okay, so: I'm going to invade Tequran-Torkan, destroy your ships and infantry and take the planets. Or on the other hand you pay me off. I would get 2TGs from the planets through scavenge, one of the planets is worth another two resources, and the other is worth a command token, or 3TGs. So I'm asking for 3TGs now (or your commodity and 2TGs), and your Trading Agreement PN, with a promise to refresh next round, even if you don't get a free refresh.

This is ruthless, as Tapper has no choice at all at this stage to give into your demands. Once he does, you'll be in a stronger position. You scary bastard.

[Tapper]

Khellendros, on 18 July 2018 - 09:28 AM, said:

@ Tapper:

Okay, so: I'm going to invade Tequran-Torkan, destroy your ships and infantry and take the planets. Or on the other hand you pay me off. I would get 2TGs from the planets through scavenge, one of the planets is worth another two resources, and the other is worth a command token, or 3TGs. So I'm asking for 3TGs now (or your commodity and 2TGs), and your Trading Agreement PN, with a promise to refresh next round, even if you don't get a free refresh.

And your guarantee if I do pay you off, is?