Itwæs Nom, on 27 February 2018 - 08:20 PM, said:
Dolmen 2.0, on 27 February 2018 - 08:13 PM, said:
Itwæs Nom, on 27 February 2018 - 08:11 PM, said:
Dolmen 2.0, on 27 February 2018 - 08:10 PM, said:
Itwæs Nom, on 27 February 2018 - 08:08 PM, said:
Dolmen 2.0, on 27 February 2018 - 07:58 PM, said:
Itwæs Nom, on 27 February 2018 - 07:37 PM, said:
D, on 27 February 2018 - 06:46 PM, said:
Itwæs Nom, on 27 February 2018 - 06:40 PM, said:
D, on 27 February 2018 - 06:37 PM, said:
Itwæs Nom, on 27 February 2018 - 06:34 PM, said:
"if messremb is Hitler then we are well and truly screwed"
You're okay with like 33% chance that we lose and are unwilling to do anything about it, that's the spirit
If Messremb were Hitler then how the fuck did we end up in the current situation?
How would Mess being Hitler prevent this situation? He hasn't been appointed chancellor after the 3 fascist policies had been enacted was he?
I want you to do a thorough analysis of the chancellor picks, votes, policies enacted, and non-Liberal behaviour demonstrated so far, and show how - based on all of that actual evidence - you can reach a conclusion where there is only 3 fascists and one of them is Messremb.
Can't be bothered but
One fascist is Nevyn
One fascist is you/Tatts, the other is liberal
Cause is almost certainly liberal
That leaves Venge,/Dolmen/Mess as most likely Hitler
Mess so far has been involved with 2l 1f policies?
Venge 1l 1f?
Dolmen I'm not sure, 1-2l?
I'm open to hearing your point if you care to share it
I was part of 2 liberal policies and no fascist policies.
One as president with Mess as VP where I got 2F 1L and handed down 1F 1L
Then as Chancellor to Venge, I was handed 2L.
The devils in the details and you're leaping over the bugger.
If you wen
How am I to know you didn't get 2F 1L?
And what exactly does that prove anyway?
Thats what I got so not sure what you mean??
Yeah I meant 1F 2L
Oh well, it means nothing, just stating FACTs. You know how useful those can be when you're making an assessment.
Facts you tend to overlook. a lot.
There are clearly certain things you're looking for and the things that look Liberal aren't it.
Well sorry that I'm more concerned about who's Hitler rather than who's liberal
And what do these facts change about one of you three being Hitler again?
Problem is such concerns turn everyone into Hitler apart from your appointed person, Cause becomes perfect because you fail to believe the three things against him but doubt the one (or none ) things against everyone else.
These facts weigh in on probability. The less probable someone is playing fascist the more likely they will continue to do so.
Remember, only one of us can be Hitler, working out who that cant be plays a part in working out who it might be and so far the best you guys can do is point at all three of us as though we are all equally likely and all less likely than Cause who has little on thread trust, activity and informational history.
Its not a rational fear you’re selling.
The reasoning doesn’t help Liberals it helps fascists.