[Itwæs Nom]

JPK, on 21 February 2017 - 04:48 PM, said:

Andorion, on 21 February 2017 - 04:39 PM, said:

Now I want to vote JPK. For no other reason than lynching Khell will be doing exactly what Blend wants. And I don't like being told what to do

FFS Ando. I'm willing to go down today to help town. I've made that clear. But at least have a real fucking reason to vote me besides "it will irritate Blend." If you want to place a protest vote based off Blend's play, then vote for Blend.

But you have no problem with people voting Khell for no real reason?

[Tattersail_]

Path-Shaper, on 21 February 2017 - 04:50 PM, said:

It is Day 1. 10 hours 10 minutes remaining

Players still alive: (JPK, Nom, Ment, Tatts, Khell, HD, Blend, Ando, Messremb, SiergieJ, Mac, Bubba)

12 players alive. 7 votes to lynch, 6 to go night.

5 votes Khell (Blend, Bubba, Messremb, JPK, HD)
6 votes JPK (Khell, Mac, Nom, Ment, SiergieJ, JPK)




Players not voted: (Ando, Tatts)

SiergiejremovedtoNom

[JPK]

Itwæs Nom, on 21 February 2017 - 04:50 PM, said:

JPK, on 21 February 2017 - 04:48 PM, said:

Andorion, on 21 February 2017 - 04:39 PM, said:

Now I want to vote JPK. For no other reason than lynching Khell will be doing exactly what Blend wants. And I don't like being told what to do

FFS Ando. I'm willing to go down today to help town. I've made that clear. But at least have a real fucking reason to vote me besides "it will irritate Blend." If you want to place a protest vote based off Blend's play, then vote for Blend.

But you have no problem with people voting Khell for no real reason?

I believe Khell to be scum or RI. I've already explained that as well as why. People are voting for Khell due to a combination of his current play and previous behavior.

That's a huge difference than voting me because of Blend's play today.

[Blend]

Mentalist, on 21 February 2017 - 04:31 PM, said:

So you agree that there's no merit to lynching khell over anyone else, beyond stroking your ego.

Whereas the alternative train has a case and some decently dodgy behaviour by JPK, including a self-vote that I really don't like.

I mean, if you want to ignore the fact that I mentioned that the amount of pushback on a Khell vote is suspicious, then yeah, I guess you're right. Truth remains, however, that I *did* say that, and it *does* support a Khell lynch. If Khell wasn't scum, why would it be so hard to lynch him? Why are a few people standing up for him? Almost as if they don't want to lose their scum partner or their master?

[Mentalist]

Tattersail_, on 21 February 2017 - 04:49 PM, said:

I'd propose we all lynch Blend

That could be brilliant,

[Tattersail_]

Vote JPK


Happy with that vote.

[Tattersail_]

Mentalist, on 21 February 2017 - 04:58 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 21 February 2017 - 04:49 PM, said:

I'd propose we all lynch Blend

That could be brilliant,

Yes, if we have the numbers.

[Blend]

Tattersail_, on 21 February 2017 - 04:58 PM, said:

Vote JPK


Happy with that vote.

Oh my gosh, shocker, Tatts won't vote out his partner!

[Path-Shaper]

Tattersail_, on 21 February 2017 - 04:55 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 21 February 2017 - 04:50 PM, said:

It is Day 1. 10 hours 10 minutes remaining

Players still alive: (JPK, Nom, Ment, Tatts, Khell, HD, Blend, Ando, Messremb, SiergieJ, Mac, Bubba)

12 players alive. 7 votes to lynch, 6 to go night.

5 votes Khell (Blend, Bubba, Messremb, JPK, HD)
5 votes JPK (Khell, Mac, Nom, Ment, JPK)
1 vote Nom (SiergieJ)




Players not voted: (Ando, Tatts)

Of course he did. What are you talking about?

SiergiejremovedtoNom

[JPK]

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 04:57 PM, said:

Mentalist, on 21 February 2017 - 04:31 PM, said:

So you agree that there's no merit to lynching khell over anyone else, beyond stroking your ego.

Whereas the alternative train has a case and some decently dodgy behaviour by JPK, including a self-vote that I really don't like.

I mean, if you want to ignore the fact that I mentioned that the amount of pushback on a Khell vote is suspicious, then yeah, I guess you're right. Truth remains, however, that I *did* say that, and it *does* support a Khell lynch. If Khell wasn't scum, why would it be so hard to lynch him? Why are a few people standing up for him? Almost as if they don't want to lose their scum partner or their master?

Whereas for me there is a distinct lack of players coming out of the woodwork to defend me. Sierg is the closest south his alternative suggestion of a Nom lynch.

[Tattersail_]

JPK, on 21 February 2017 - 04:59 PM, said:

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 04:57 PM, said:

Mentalist, on 21 February 2017 - 04:31 PM, said:

So you agree that there's no merit to lynching khell over anyone else, beyond stroking your ego.

Whereas the alternative train has a case and some decently dodgy behaviour by JPK, including a self-vote that I really don't like.

I mean, if you want to ignore the fact that I mentioned that the amount of pushback on a Khell vote is suspicious, then yeah, I guess you're right. Truth remains, however, that I *did* say that, and it *does* support a Khell lynch. If Khell wasn't scum, why would it be so hard to lynch him? Why are a few people standing up for him? Almost as if they don't want to lose their scum partner or their master?

Whereas for me there is a distinct lack of players coming out of the woodwork to defend me. Sierg is the closest south his alternative suggestion of a Nom lynch.

Blend is pushing the other way, there are people voting Khell not you and some seeing how this plays out.

[Tattersail_]

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 04:59 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 21 February 2017 - 04:58 PM, said:

Vote JPK


Happy with that vote.

Oh my gosh, shocker, Tatts won't vote out his partner!

How is that a shocker when I voted him earlier?

So now I am Khell's partner?

remove vote


vote Blend


If we do not lynch you or Khell, this will be you again tomorrow.

[Tattersail_]

How funny would it be if you were the one lynched over him hey? That'd be hilarious.

[Blend]

Tattersail_, on 21 February 2017 - 05:01 PM, said:

JPK, on 21 February 2017 - 04:59 PM, said:

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 04:57 PM, said:

Mentalist, on 21 February 2017 - 04:31 PM, said:

So you agree that there's no merit to lynching khell over anyone else, beyond stroking your ego.

Whereas the alternative train has a case and some decently dodgy behaviour by JPK, including a self-vote that I really don't like.

I mean, if you want to ignore the fact that I mentioned that the amount of pushback on a Khell vote is suspicious, then yeah, I guess you're right. Truth remains, however, that I *did* say that, and it *does* support a Khell lynch. If Khell wasn't scum, why would it be so hard to lynch him? Why are a few people standing up for him? Almost as if they don't want to lose their scum partner or their master?

Whereas for me there is a distinct lack of players coming out of the woodwork to defend me. Sierg is the closest south his alternative suggestion of a Nom lynch.

Blend is pushing the other way, there are people voting Khell not you and some seeing how this plays out.

I'd say that I've been pulling, nay, dragging the other way. I don't care if JPK is lynched, I think it's doubtful he's scum if Khell is, but I've been pulling for a Khell lynch from the first minute of Day 1. There'd certainly be more information to parse from a JPK lynch than a Nom lynch at the very least.

[JPK]

Tattersail_, on 21 February 2017 - 05:01 PM, said:

JPK, on 21 February 2017 - 04:59 PM, said:

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 04:57 PM, said:

Mentalist, on 21 February 2017 - 04:31 PM, said:

So you agree that there's no merit to lynching khell over anyone else, beyond stroking your ego.

Whereas the alternative train has a case and some decently dodgy behaviour by JPK, including a self-vote that I really don't like.

I mean, if you want to ignore the fact that I mentioned that the amount of pushback on a Khell vote is suspicious, then yeah, I guess you're right. Truth remains, however, that I *did* say that, and it *does* support a Khell lynch. If Khell wasn't scum, why would it be so hard to lynch him? Why are a few people standing up for him? Almost as if they don't want to lose their scum partner or their master?

Whereas for me there is a distinct lack of players coming out of the woodwork to defend me. Sierg is the closest south his alternative suggestion of a Nom lynch.

Blend is pushing the other way, there are people voting Khell not you and some seeing how this plays out.

Which is a far cry from the number of people popping up with a straight-up "no, don't lynch Khell. There's no reason. " and you fucking know it Tatts.

[Mentalist]

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 04:57 PM, said:

Mentalist, on 21 February 2017 - 04:31 PM, said:

So you agree that there's no merit to lynching khell over anyone else, beyond stroking your ego.

Whereas the alternative train has a case and some decently dodgy behaviour by JPK, including a self-vote that I really don't like.

I mean, if you want to ignore the fact that I mentioned that the amount of pushback on a Khell vote is suspicious, then yeah, I guess you're right. Truth remains, however, that I *did* say that, and it *does* support a Khell lynch. If Khell wasn't scum, why would it be so hard to lynch him? Why are a few people standing up for him? Almost as if they don't want to lose their scum partner or their master?

Let's see here:

You, mess and bubba start the khell train with "it's Khell, lynch him!" votes.

A few people call you out for it.

JPK does his whole "entrapment of Khell" thing, and gets voted, then he does the "I'm not smart enough for complex plays, but you should vote khell, because he fell for this complex play I just made" thing.

And then people vote JPK for trying to deeptroat his toes, and all they hear is "they must be linked to Khell, who is scum because I said so"

And then JPK self-votes to L-1 with almost an RL day to go.

[Tattersail_]

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 05:03 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 21 February 2017 - 05:01 PM, said:

JPK, on 21 February 2017 - 04:59 PM, said:

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 04:57 PM, said:

Mentalist, on 21 February 2017 - 04:31 PM, said:

So you agree that there's no merit to lynching khell over anyone else, beyond stroking your ego.

Whereas the alternative train has a case and some decently dodgy behaviour by JPK, including a self-vote that I really don't like.

I mean, if you want to ignore the fact that I mentioned that the amount of pushback on a Khell vote is suspicious, then yeah, I guess you're right. Truth remains, however, that I *did* say that, and it *does* support a Khell lynch. If Khell wasn't scum, why would it be so hard to lynch him? Why are a few people standing up for him? Almost as if they don't want to lose their scum partner or their master?

Whereas for me there is a distinct lack of players coming out of the woodwork to defend me. Sierg is the closest south his alternative suggestion of a Nom lynch.

Blend is pushing the other way, there are people voting Khell not you and some seeing how this plays out.

I'd say that I've been pulling, nay, dragging the other way. I don't care if JPK is lynched, I think it's doubtful he's scum if Khell is, but I've been pulling for a Khell lynch from the first minute of Day 1. There'd certainly be more information to parse from a JPK lynch than a Nom lynch at the very least.

You are voting for Khell because he is Khell not because you believe him to be scum

[Blend]

Tattersail_, on 21 February 2017 - 05:02 PM, said:

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 04:59 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 21 February 2017 - 04:58 PM, said:

Vote JPK


Happy with that vote.

Oh my gosh, shocker, Tatts won't vote out his partner!

How is that a shocker when I voted him earlier?

So now I am Khell's partner?

remove vote


vote Blend


If we do not lynch you or Khell, this will be you again tomorrow.

Please, your vote was on him for what, like 2 minutes? Nah, you've been doing anything you can to try to stall the Khell lynch, you've tried offering alternatives. The problem is no one believes you Tatts. You're acting scummy and everyone knows it. This OMGUS vote is just more of the same.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 1. 9 hours 55 minutes remaining

Players still alive: (JPK, Nom, Ment, Tatts, Khell, HD, Blend, Ando, Messremb, SiergieJ, Mac, Bubba)

12 players alive. 7 votes to lynch, 6 to go night.

5 votes Khell (Blend, Bubba, Messremb, JPK, HD)
5 votes JPK (Khell, Mac, Nom, Ment, JPK)
1 vote Nom (SiergieJ)
1 vote Blend (Tatts)




Players not voted: (Ando)

[Tattersail_]

JPK, on 21 February 2017 - 05:03 PM, said:

Tattersail_, on 21 February 2017 - 05:01 PM, said:

JPK, on 21 February 2017 - 04:59 PM, said:

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 04:57 PM, said:

Mentalist, on 21 February 2017 - 04:31 PM, said:

So you agree that there's no merit to lynching khell over anyone else, beyond stroking your ego.

Whereas the alternative train has a case and some decently dodgy behaviour by JPK, including a self-vote that I really don't like.

I mean, if you want to ignore the fact that I mentioned that the amount of pushback on a Khell vote is suspicious, then yeah, I guess you're right. Truth remains, however, that I *did* say that, and it *does* support a Khell lynch. If Khell wasn't scum, why would it be so hard to lynch him? Why are a few people standing up for him? Almost as if they don't want to lose their scum partner or their master?

Whereas for me there is a distinct lack of players coming out of the woodwork to defend me. Sierg is the closest south his alternative suggestion of a Nom lynch.

Blend is pushing the other way, there are people voting Khell not you and some seeing how this plays out.

Which is a far cry from the number of people popping up with a straight-up "no, don't lynch Khell. There's no reason. " and you fucking know it Tatts.

No one is saying don't lynch Khell, they are saying lynch for the right reasons.