[Blend]

Itwæs Nom, on 21 February 2017 - 06:33 PM, said:

You can't expect me find people scummy based on the fact itself that they're doing what I find absolutely reasonable.

What does this even mean?

You don't find it mildly suspicious that there is so much opposition to a Khell lynch? It's a Day 1 lynch, it's not like it's DDay and I'm trying to convince you to lynch him with a case you don't like, it's fucking Day 1, and I think that I've created a situation where it's pretty obvious that there are a few people who absolutely do not want Khell lynched, there's a couple of you who just don't like the way I'm playing, and then there are some that agree with me that a Khell lynch is reasonable - whether that be for reasons they haven't said, for the simple reason of putting this Day 1 stuff behind us so we can move on, or because they actually believe that Khell might be scum. Yes, the case started out as a vendetta, but I think that there has been enough push-back on a Khell lynch with no good reason besides "I don't like the way Blend's playing," which is an easy answer, for Khell not to at least have some kind of behind the scenes connection. No one can or has pointed out a reason that Khell might NOT be scum. You're all just saying that just because I'm so deadset on Khell, he's obviously not a good lynch - which is an utter bullshit reason, and exactly the type of reasoning that scum love to hide behind.

[Itwæs Nom]

Khellendros, on 21 February 2017 - 06:26 PM, said:

I've looked over the Nom thing. It's something which is worth coming back to perhaps, I certainly wouldn't dismiss it out of hand because that is a very interesting final line - the kind of get-out clause a scum might feel is necessary.

However, this day for better or worse needs to end with a me or JPK lynch. By which I mean a JPK lynch.

And then people need to find the energy to sift back through all this

And as the pressure starts to diminish you fade into background again?


But yeah thinking about Blend, I still prefer my Kitsu vote over that, I'm way more curious about Kitsu's CF than Blend's.

[Tattersail_]

remove vote

Vote JPK

Fuck your rambles Blend.

[Macros]

Blend.

Honestly.
if you ha went out, and tracked khell normally and made a case, there wouldn't be resistance. you have a totally baseless platform.
as has been mentioned, you have just been screaming khell must die hes evil! then as people have poo poo'd your screams, yu've turned it on them.
its utter nonsense.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 1. 8 hours 9 minutes remaining

Players still alive: (JPK, Nom, Ment, Tatts, Khell, HD, Blend, Ando, Messremb, SiergieJ, Mac, Bubba)

12 players alive. 7 votes to lynch, 6 to go night.

5 votes Khell (Blend, Bubba, Messremb, JPK, HD)
6 votes JPK (Khell, Mac, Nom, Ment, Ando, Tatts)
1 votes Blend (SiergieJ)




Players not voted: ()

[Blend]

Macros, on 21 February 2017 - 06:50 PM, said:

Blend.

Honestly.
if you ha went out, and tracked khell normally and made a case, there wouldn't be resistance. you have a totally baseless platform.
as has been mentioned, you have just been screaming khell must die hes evil! then as people have poo poo'd your screams, yu've turned it on them.
its utter nonsense.

Cause bitching and complaining about the way that I'm playing instead of actually playing the game and, I don't know, making a case other than "I don't like the way Blend is playing so I'll vote the opposite way" is NOT utter nonsense? Seriously, show me some actual gameplay Macros.

[Tattersail_]

Putting baby to bed grabbing food etc. I'll be around if people want to serve Blend instead.

[Blend]

Tattersail_, on 21 February 2017 - 06:48 PM, said:

remove vote

Vote JPK

Fuck your rambles Blend.

Gods forbid I should actually play the game eh?

[Mentalist]

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 06:52 PM, said:

Macros, on 21 February 2017 - 06:50 PM, said:

Blend.

Honestly.
if you ha went out, and tracked khell normally and made a case, there wouldn't be resistance. you have a totally baseless platform.
as has been mentioned, you have just been screaming khell must die hes evil! then as people have poo poo'd your screams, yu've turned it on them.
its utter nonsense.

Cause bitching and complaining about the way that I'm playing instead of actually playing the game and, I don't know, making a case other than "I don't like the way Blend is playing so I'll vote the opposite way" is NOT utter nonsense? Seriously, show me some actual gameplay Macros.

Except, y'know, there is an actual case out there. And you are only dismissing it because it was started by Khell.

Whom you "originally" labelled as scum for... "arbitrary" reasons.

[JPK]

Itwæs Nom, on 21 February 2017 - 06:48 PM, said:

Khellendros, on 21 February 2017 - 06:26 PM, said:

I've looked over the Nom thing. It's something which is worth coming back to perhaps, I certainly wouldn't dismiss it out of hand because that is a very interesting final line - the kind of get-out clause a scum might feel is necessary.

However, this day for better or worse needs to end with a me or JPK lynch. By which I mean a JPK lynch.

And then people need to find the energy to sift back through all this

And as the pressure starts to diminish you fade into background again?


But yeah thinking about Blend, I still prefer my Kitsu vote over that, I'm way more curious about Kitsu's CF than Blend's.

Here's hoping you finally learn that you have bad scumdar on me Nom.

Remove Vote


Vote JPK

[Blend]

Mentalist, on 21 February 2017 - 06:56 PM, said:

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 06:52 PM, said:

Macros, on 21 February 2017 - 06:50 PM, said:

Blend.

Honestly.
if you ha went out, and tracked khell normally and made a case, there wouldn't be resistance. you have a totally baseless platform.
as has been mentioned, you have just been screaming khell must die hes evil! then as people have poo poo'd your screams, yu've turned it on them.
its utter nonsense.

Cause bitching and complaining about the way that I'm playing instead of actually playing the game and, I don't know, making a case other than "I don't like the way Blend is playing so I'll vote the opposite way" is NOT utter nonsense? Seriously, show me some actual gameplay Macros.

Except, y'know, there is an actual case out there. And you are only dismissing it because it was started by Khell.

Whom you "originally" labelled as scum for... "arbitrary" reasons.

No, I am dismissing it because it's a fucking stupid case.

Let's look at what the main detractors have done all day...

Macros spent all of Day 1 either:

Voting for me...

Macros, on 20 February 2017 - 03:36 PM, said:

I actually really like nickelback, hating them is just something that has become internet cool to do.
They play their own instruments, write their own songs and don't mime live.
This puts them ahead of 90% of the shite played on "popular" radio.

that aside. I'm coming out swinging

vote blend

Voting for Khell's target...

Macros, on 20 February 2017 - 06:20 PM, said:

fuck it

I feel dirty for saying this but I want to test Khells theory

vote JPK

Then trying to discredit me (to protect his master Khell mayhaps?), or outright bitching about the fact that he doesn't like how I'm playing.

Macros, on 20 February 2017 - 10:33 PM, said:

Your votes have been nothing other than OMG WE MUST LYNCH KHELL DERP DERP DERP

Khell has put forth at least a modicum of reasoning to his vote to you, which has seemingly pushed people into further frothing at the mouth absurdism.
We get it, khell is sneaky.
So the fuck what, he has done nothing scummy so far and this deluded rhetoric of blends is quite frankly iritating. Always lynch khell, even if he's town we have to lynch him.
What if he's a guard, a healer or a cop?
How in under fuck would lynching him be beficial for the town?
The nonsense has passed, we have real stuff to play with now and blindly lynching khell because of previous games, without even comparing his play to town or scum performances is fucking retarded.

Macros, on 21 February 2017 - 09:41 AM, said:

morning.

Im going to say something massively contraversial.

I feel sorry for Khell, he can't do anything without being screamed at and jumped on, why? because he has the temerity to be a good player? to have the sheer gall to win some games as a killer? heaven forfend, the man played mafia! how dare he!

how often are we hamstrung by bad town play (myself very much included here) most times scum win because we fuck up.

Tatts says his logical vote is JPK, the says he wants to lynch khell just because. keep your grudges until you are a killer. and shoot them in the face.

Town play is trying to make logical moves to benefit us all. Not crying, B b b b but khells so sneaky he set me up for a fall one time he was a killer.
so the fuck what, if that's the case everyone here is probably candidate for a petty vengeance lynch. unless you are copping a direct correlation between a players actions in this game, and how they played in another game, the past is fucking irrelevant.

grow up and play the game

Everything he has done has been to try to steer the vote away from Khell. But he's not protecting Khell?

[HoosierDaddy]

Whelp, I guess we'll find out something now.

[Itwæs Nom]

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 06:47 PM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 21 February 2017 - 06:33 PM, said:

You can't expect me find people scummy based on the fact itself that they're doing what I find absolutely reasonable.

What does this even mean?

You don't find it mildly suspicious that there is so much opposition to a Khell lynch? It's a Day 1 lynch, it's not like it's DDay and I'm trying to convince you to lynch him with a case you don't like, it's fucking Day 1, and I think that I've created a situation where it's pretty obvious that there are a few people who absolutely do not want Khell lynched, there's a couple of you who just don't like the way I'm playing, and then there are some that agree with me that a Khell lynch is reasonable - whether that be for reasons they haven't said, for the simple reason of putting this Day 1 stuff behind us so we can move on, or because they actually believe that Khell might be scum. Yes, the case started out as a vendetta, but I think that there has been enough push-back on a Khell lynch with no good reason besides "I don't like the way Blend's playing," which is an easy answer, for Khell not to at least have some kind of behind the scenes connection. No one can or has pointed out a reason that Khell might NOT be scum. You're all just saying that just because I'm so deadset on Khell, he's obviously not a good lynch - which is an utter bullshit reason, and exactly the type of reasoning that scum love to hide behind.

I can't find the resistance suspicious because everyone in the resistance is doing the very same thing as me. Or they're pretending to, but the situation you've created doesn't allow anyone to tell these two apart. If Khell is scum you've created the situation where all that his fellas gotta do is point out that there's no real reason for the lynch, and they'd be right! There is no situation that makes it easier to hide for scum that want to defend their fellow. Hell this couldn't even be called hiding, they'd still be more reasonable than you.

[Mentalist]

Itwæs Nom, on 21 February 2017 - 07:08 PM, said:

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 06:47 PM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 21 February 2017 - 06:33 PM, said:

You can't expect me find people scummy based on the fact itself that they're doing what I find absolutely reasonable.

What does this even mean?

You don't find it mildly suspicious that there is so much opposition to a Khell lynch? It's a Day 1 lynch, it's not like it's DDay and I'm trying to convince you to lynch him with a case you don't like, it's fucking Day 1, and I think that I've created a situation where it's pretty obvious that there are a few people who absolutely do not want Khell lynched, there's a couple of you who just don't like the way I'm playing, and then there are some that agree with me that a Khell lynch is reasonable - whether that be for reasons they haven't said, for the simple reason of putting this Day 1 stuff behind us so we can move on, or because they actually believe that Khell might be scum. Yes, the case started out as a vendetta, but I think that there has been enough push-back on a Khell lynch with no good reason besides "I don't like the way Blend's playing," which is an easy answer, for Khell not to at least have some kind of behind the scenes connection. No one can or has pointed out a reason that Khell might NOT be scum. You're all just saying that just because I'm so deadset on Khell, he's obviously not a good lynch - which is an utter bullshit reason, and exactly the type of reasoning that scum love to hide behind.

I can't find the resistance suspicious because everyone in the resistance is doing the very same thing as me. Or they're pretending to, but the situation you've created doesn't allow anyone to tell these two apart. If Khell is scum you've created the situation where all that his fellas gotta do is point out that there's no real reason for the lynch, and they'd be right! There is no situation that makes it easier to hide for scum that want to defend their fellow. Hell this couldn't even be called hiding, they'd still be more reasonable than you.

This makes it more likely that Blend is a symp, tbh.

[Siergiej]

Blend, you seem to think there is a train on Khell and a train of people who are opposed to lynching Khell. This is not the case. There is (was, because we're in the Night already) a train on Khell and a train of people who would rather lynch based on cases than on who you tell them to lynch.

This has been a great D1 up to a point. Yes, your train got people talking and that's a good thing. But that train was still nonsense (come on, you started riding Khell way before he even checked in). That's okay, most D1 trains are. But you know it and yet you refuse to even acknowledge we could focus our attention elsewhere. Whoever the killers are, you're doing them a favor. That's why I was perfectly okay with lynching you - you're unwillingness to do anything other than point fingers at one person for no reason other than meta has us running in circles and will have us driving off the cliff.

[Macros]

Itwæs Nom, on 21 February 2017 - 07:08 PM, said:

Blend, on 21 February 2017 - 06:47 PM, said:

Itwæs Nom, on 21 February 2017 - 06:33 PM, said:

You can't expect me find people scummy based on the fact itself that they're doing what I find absolutely reasonable.

What does this even mean?

You don't find it mildly suspicious that there is so much opposition to a Khell lynch? It's a Day 1 lynch, it's not like it's DDay and I'm trying to convince you to lynch him with a case you don't like, it's fucking Day 1, and I think that I've created a situation where it's pretty obvious that there are a few people who absolutely do not want Khell lynched, there's a couple of you who just don't like the way I'm playing, and then there are some that agree with me that a Khell lynch is reasonable - whether that be for reasons they haven't said, for the simple reason of putting this Day 1 stuff behind us so we can move on, or because they actually believe that Khell might be scum. Yes, the case started out as a vendetta, but I think that there has been enough push-back on a Khell lynch with no good reason besides "I don't like the way Blend's playing," which is an easy answer, for Khell not to at least have some kind of behind the scenes connection. No one can or has pointed out a reason that Khell might NOT be scum. You're all just saying that just because I'm so deadset on Khell, he's obviously not a good lynch - which is an utter bullshit reason, and exactly the type of reasoning that scum love to hide behind.

I can't find the resistance suspicious because everyone in the resistance is doing the very same thing as me. Or they're pretending to, but the situation you've created doesn't allow anyone to tell these two apart. If Khell is scum you've created the situation where all that his fellas gotta do is point out that there's no real reason for the lynch, and they'd be right! There is no situation that makes it easier to hide for scum that want to defend their fellow. Hell this couldn't even be called hiding, they'd still be more reasonable than you.

this, again.
blegh, I'm not defending Khell, I would be arguing against the bullshit approach no matter who your target was, unless THEY HAD DONE SOMETHING SCUMMY ON DAY ONE to jump on. which as far as I can see Khell hasn't.

whatever, I'm genuinely fucked off that Blend is just trying to wipe my arguements off as "waa waa waa I dont like the way blend plays"
my argument is your approach, regardless of your logic on the khell vote has been so ridiculous it has been detrimental, not only to the town, but ironically, to your own personal anti khell crusade, it has become such a pastiche now that players are thinking about voting YOU off because of it.
theres been 14 pages of day one, I wont be rereading most of it becuase of this shit storm that YOU created.
ments probably right

[Khellendros]

Well whatever happens, that was the right decision.

[Siergiej]

Are you still so sure JPK will flip scum?

[Khellendros]

Siergiej, on 21 February 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Are you still so sure JPK will flip scum?

Probability says he's town, but better him than me, you know?

[Siergiej]

Khellendros, on 21 February 2017 - 07:29 PM, said:

Siergiej, on 21 February 2017 - 07:27 PM, said:

Are you still so sure JPK will flip scum?

Probability says he's town, but better him than me, you know?

I guess we'll find out soon enough