[Sorrit]

Path-Shaper, on 10 February 2017 - 05:57 PM, said:

The leader of the Bridgeburners makes an announcement:

Quote

Sorrit has a spell called Haste which will allow him 2 night actions. I think that we can collectively say that we do not want him to have that ability. He is either Lionel or Cecil. I think the BHs and the 5th know who their leaders are and can decide which. I suggest a temporary alliance to eliminate this threat.

It's actually an additional basic attack Iparth, right Lock? Not like I'd expect much honesty from Lock, gotta support his leader. You have to be the BBs' leader, because of this announcement:

Path-Shaper, on 10 February 2017 - 04:04 PM, said:

The leader of the Bonehunters makes an announcement:

Quote

Iparth Erule is the leader of the Bridgeburners.

You don't actually have any info regarding my class, rank or alignment. Why not just lynch the confirmed leader instead?

[Sorrit]

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 06:20 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 10 February 2017 - 05:57 PM, said:

The leader of the Bridgeburners makes an announcement:

Quote

Sorrit has a spell called Haste which will allow him 2 night actions. I think that we can collectively say that we do not want him to have that ability. He is either Lionel or Cecil. I think the BHs and the 5th know who their leaders are and can decide which. I suggest a temporary alliance to eliminate this threat.

It's actually an additional basic attack Iparth, right Lock? Not like I'd expect much honesty from Lock, gotta support his leader. You have to be the BBs' leader, because of this announcement:

Path-Shaper, on 10 February 2017 - 04:04 PM, said:

The leader of the Bonehunters makes an announcement:

Quote

Iparth Erule is the leader of the Bridgeburners.

You can't possibly be any other player, and you ain't a puppet neither

edit: grammar

This post has been edited by Sorrit: 10 February 2017 - 06:24 PM

[Alkend]

Can we wait for Night to be resolved first, it may not even be an issue.

Also, just like to point out that the "announcements" even from the same Leader have been inconsistent and contrary.

[Sorrit]

Alkend, on 10 February 2017 - 06:33 PM, said:

Can we wait for Night to be resolved first, it may not even be an issue.

Also, just like to point out that the "announcements" even from the same Leader have been inconsistent and contrary.

All that I really base on that announcement is that it means Iparth is not BHs' leader.

[Iparth Erule]

Well, I'm not.
But I'll admit that I've been having some lovely conversations and got some great dirt.

Haste (Day Action) Cost - 4 AP: Target player will be able to perform an additional basic attack during the next night cycle, but will be unable to vote during the next day cycle.

Only an heir or leader would spend 4 AP on this no?

[Sorrit]

Iparth Erule, on 10 February 2017 - 06:35 PM, said:

Well, I'm not.
But I'll admit that I've been having some lovely conversations and got some great dirt.

Haste (Day Action) Cost - 4 AP: Target player will be able to perform an additional basic attack during the next night cycle, but will be unable to vote during the next day cycle.

Only an heir or leader would spend 4 AP on this no?

Not necessarily...? There are some abilities that give you additional APs too

So, you lied in the announcement btw.

[Path-Shaper]

A loud booming noise emanates from Kessobahn.

[Iparth Erule]

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 06:40 PM, said:

Iparth Erule, on 10 February 2017 - 06:35 PM, said:

Well, I'm not.
But I'll admit that I've been having some lovely conversations and got some great dirt.

Haste (Day Action) Cost - 4 AP: Target player will be able to perform an additional basic attack during the next night cycle, but will be unable to vote during the next day cycle.

Only an heir or leader would spend 4 AP on this no?

Not necessarily...? There are some abilities that give you additional APs too

So, you lied in the announcement btw.

I can't control what my leader says. I just told him my finds. Since the 5ths leader is dead Lionel would be the new leader of the 5th right?

[Path-Shaper]

Sorrit has been killed. He was Globberfaced Mccunty the Stout Halfling Druid.


It is Day 7. Timer is frozen with 47 hours and 59 minutes remaining

6 Players still alive: Alkend, Fanderay, Iparth Erule, Kessobahn, Lock, Tulas Shorn

3 votes to lynch, 3 votes to go to night.


Players not voted: Alkend, Fanderay, Iparth Erule, Kessobahn, Lock, Tulas Shorn

This post has been edited by Path-Shaper: 10 February 2017 - 06:55 PM

[Iparth Erule]

Good spell for a Druid.

[Alkend]

Iparth Erule, on 10 February 2017 - 06:59 PM, said:

Good spell for a Druid.

Seriously shitty for a Leader though - it reads to me like you give *someone else* the extra attack but prevent them from voting.

[Alkend]

Someone please correct me if I'm wrong but there are 4 player left alive but still 6 alts? How have we let 2 fakes live this long?

[Alkend]

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 06:20 PM, said:

Path-Shaper, on 10 February 2017 - 05:57 PM, said:

The leader of the Bridgeburners makes an announcement:

Quote

Sorrit has a spell called Haste which will allow him 2 night actions. I think that we can collectively say that we do not want him to have that ability. He is either Lionel or Cecil. I think the BHs and the 5th know who their leaders are and can decide which. I suggest a temporary alliance to eliminate this threat.

It's actually an additional basic attack Iparth, right Lock? Not like I'd expect much honesty from Lock, gotta support his leader. You have to be the BBs' leader, because of this announcement:

Path-Shaper, on 10 February 2017 - 04:04 PM, said:

The leader of the Bonehunters makes an announcement:

Quote

Iparth Erule is the leader of the Bridgeburners.

You don't actually have any info regarding my class, rank or alignment. Why not just lynch the confirmed leader instead?

Sorrit, on 10 February 2017 - 06:34 PM, said:

Alkend, on 10 February 2017 - 06:33 PM, said:

Can we wait for Night to be resolved first, it may not even be an issue.Also, just like to point out that the "announcements" even from the same Leader have been inconsistent and contrary.

All that I really base on that announcement is that it means Iparth is not BHs' leader.

This seems pretty clear to me

Vote Lock

[Alkend]

Actually,

Remove Vote

No need to rush this, we've got all weekend.

[Alkend]

Anyone else around?

[Iparth Erule]

I am. So who do you think is a real alt? In guessing Tulas?

[Alkend]

Iparth Erule, on 10 February 2017 - 07:36 PM, said:

I am. So who do you think is a real alt? In guessing Tulas?

If Tulas is a real player I'm going to be very pissed off. They've contributed nothing. No way would they deserve a win. Hell they don't deserve to be this far along.

Pretty sure Fanderay is real, those two booms (and the fact that one happened on someone else) verifies the claim of someone attacking them and a BP would have been stripped by the first attack. Unless it is a Paladin ability thing and they're both Paladins.

[Alkend]

Interestingly, Lock and Kessobahn have been either on or off each lynch train together. I'm pretty sure one of their votes counts and one doesn't. Master and fake perhaps.

[Iparth Erule]

Alkend, on 10 February 2017 - 07:40 PM, said:

Iparth Erule, on 10 February 2017 - 07:36 PM, said:

I am. So who do you think is a real alt? In guessing Tulas?

If Tulas is a real player I'm going to be very pissed off. They've contributed nothing. No way would they deserve a win. Hell they don't deserve to be this far along.

Pretty sure Fanderay is real, those two booms (and the fact that one happened on someone else) verifies the claim of someone attacking them and a BP would have been stripped by the first attack. Unless it is a Paladin ability thing and they're both Paladins.

Then by that logic Kesso must be real. He had the same booms.

[Alkend]

Iparth Erule, on 10 February 2017 - 08:52 PM, said:

Alkend, on 10 February 2017 - 07:40 PM, said:

Iparth Erule, on 10 February 2017 - 07:36 PM, said:

I am. So who do you think is a real alt? In guessing Tulas?

If Tulas is a real player I'm going to be very pissed off. They've contributed nothing. No way would they deserve a win. Hell they don't deserve to be this far along.

Pretty sure Fanderay is real, those two booms (and the fact that one happened on someone else) verifies the claim of someone attacking them and a BP would have been stripped by the first attack. Unless it is a Paladin ability thing and they're both Paladins.

Then by that logic Kesso must be real. He had the same booms.

Back that up with a quote. I've only noticed one boom, this night just gone. That could be a BP going off of a fake.