[Kessobahn]

So any thoughts today Lock?

[Iparth Erule]

remove vote

I'd like to hold off a bit.

[Fanderay]

Right, I've been out of it for the last few days. Going to go and do a recap as I think I'm a little bit behind.

[Fanderay]

Something that stands out to me are the following two posts:

Iparth Erule, on 10 February 2017 - 06:35 PM, said:

Well, I'm not.
But I'll admit that I've been having some lovely conversations and got some great dirt.

Haste (Day Action) Cost - 4 AP: Target player will be able to perform an additional basic attack during the next night cycle, but will be unable to vote during the next day cycle.

Only an heir or leader would spend 4 AP on this no?

Lock, on 11 February 2017 - 12:07 PM, said:

Well that's ironic. I was informed yesterday that I was given Haste and had to use it, so I used it on Sorrit.

Both players have gathered information about the Haste spell on the same night. Seems like a bit of a coincidence to me. Perhaps they are able to communicate with each other (or even are the same player?). I think that would fit with how they've played so far. Maybe it's worth lynching one to find out?

Not feeling a Tulas Shorn lynch. To me that smells like a spare alt that someone doesn't have time to play with. Hence the coasting.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 7. 47 hours and 59 minutes remaining

6 Players still alive: Alkend, Fanderay, Iparth Erule, Kessobahn, Lock, Tulas Shorn

3 votes to lynch, 3 votes to go to night.


Players not voted: Alkend, Fanderay, Iparth Erule, Kessobahn, Lock, Tulas Shorn

This post has been edited by Path-Shaper: 13 February 2017 - 08:50 PM

[Path-Shaper]

The leader of the Fifth makes the following announcement:

Quote

Bridgeburners win unless we lynch one of them today. Bonehunter leader (whoever you are), I think we need to ally to stand a chance. Are you with me?

[Path-Shaper]

The leader of the Bonehunters makes the following announcement:

Quote

To the remaining Fifth. Don't bother voting. That way no possibility we help lynch each other and hand victory to BBs. And if you have any way to defend yourself at night, do it the next two nights.

[Iparth Erule]

So, I think we are better off getting rid of the bonehunters leader since he could possibly bring a teammate back from the dead. There hasn't been an announcement saying that is no longer possible, so it is still out on the table.

I'll let you all in on what I know, and have figured out.

First of all, Fanderay is a real boy. I read part of his pm and he has an Entropic ward that ensures that any player targeting him with a night action will take 1 additional damage from all sources during the same night cycle.

Second, I reread the thread, and Tulas has never voted. I'm pretty sure he is the clockwork toy since his votes don't count. When I reread, I saw a lot of similarities between Fanderay's and Tulas's posts which convince me they are the same person.

vote Fanderay

[Iparth Erule]

So if you get what I'm saying, targeting Fanderay will only hurt you.

[Lock]

I can't vote today because of the Haste thing cast on me.

[Iparth Erule]

Lock, on 13 February 2017 - 05:45 PM, said:

I can't vote today because of the Haste thing cast on me.

Well that sucks. I guess we are stuck waiting for night. Have you sorted out who is who?

[Fanderay]

Huh, I guess Lock and Iparth Erule can't be the same player then (otherwise why would they have that conversation out loud on thread?)

[Kessobahn]

So Fanderay, why did you tell Alkend to defend himself tonight? Are you worried he'll use an action that would prevent you from bringing back someone from the dead?

[Alkend]

Quote

Haste (Day Action) Cost - 4 AP: Target player will be able to perform an additional basic attack during the next night cycle, but will be unable to vote during the next day cycle.

Lock, on 11 February 2017 - 12:07 PM, said:

Well that's ironic. I was informed yesterday that I was given Haste and had to use it, so I used it on Sorrit.

Lock, on 13 February 2017 - 05:45 PM, said:

I can't vote today because of the Haste thing cast on me.

Does anyone else see the issue here?

[Alkend]

Path-Shaper, on 10 February 2017 - 06:54 PM, said:

Sorrit has been killed. He was Globberfaced Mccunty the Stout Halfling Druid.


It is Day 7. Timer is frozen with 47 hours and 59 minutes remaining

6 Players still alive: Alkend, Fanderay, Iparth Erule, Kessobahn, Lock, Tulas Shorn

3 votes to lynch, 3 votes to go to night.


Players not voted: Alkend, Fanderay, Iparth Erule, Kessobahn, Lock, Tulas Shorn

Path-Shaper, on 13 February 2017 - 02:41 PM, said:

It is Day 7. 47 hours and 59 minutes remaining

6 Players still alive: Alkend, Fanderay, Iparth Erule, Kessobahn, Lock, Tulas Shorn

4 votes to lynch, 3 votes to go to night.


Players not voted: Alkend, Fanderay, Iparth Erule, Kessobahn, Lock, Tulas Shorn

Some clarification would be useful PS

[Path-Shaper]

Forgot to update the numbers as MM doesn't have a way to recognize whether or not people affect votes, so I have to manually update each time.

It should be 3 to lynch, 3 to go to night.

[Alkend]

Fanderay, on 12 February 2017 - 04:30 PM, said:

Not feeling a Tulas Shorn lynch. To me that smells like a spare alt that someone doesn't have time to play with. Hence the coasting.

I'm torn right now between night and TS because I don't think we'll get much else. TS I could get behind simply on the basis that they may be the fake alt that means we need 3 votes to go to night and not 2 when there are 4 players alive. As things stand if the BBs don't want to go to night we sit here with our thumbs up our asses hoping that everyone not BB agrees. Also leaving game resolution purely to NAs sucks.

[Alkend]

Iparth Erule, on 13 February 2017 - 05:11 PM, said:

Second, I reread the thread, and Tulas has never voted. I'm pretty sure he is the clockwork toy since his votes don't count. When I reread, I saw a lot of similarities between Fanderay's and Tulas's posts which convince me they are the same person.

vote Fanderay

Uhh...

Tulas Shorn, on 03 February 2017 - 01:50 AM, said:

This has turned into an interesting day hasn't it. In any case, out of the two options on the table I choose

Vote Mockra

[Iparth Erule]

Alkend, on 13 February 2017 - 09:17 PM, said:

Iparth Erule, on 13 February 2017 - 05:11 PM, said:

Second, I reread the thread, and Tulas has never voted. I'm pretty sure he is the clockwork toy since his votes don't count. When I reread, I saw a lot of similarities between Fanderay's and Tulas's posts which convince me they are the same person.

vote Fanderay

Uhh...

Tulas Shorn, on 03 February 2017 - 01:50 AM, said:

This has turned into an interesting day hasn't it. In any case, out of the two options on the table I choose

Vote Mockra

I missed that, but Gamelon was on that train and based on previous games, an elemental's vote may have counted.

[Iparth Erule]

Alkend, on 13 February 2017 - 09:13 PM, said:

Fanderay, on 12 February 2017 - 04:30 PM, said:

Not feeling a Tulas Shorn lynch. To me that smells like a spare alt that someone doesn't have time to play with. Hence the coasting.

I'm torn right now between night and TS because I don't think we'll get much else. TS I could get behind simply on the basis that they may be the fake alt that means we need 3 votes to go to night and not 2 when there are 4 players alive. As things stand if the BBs don't want to go to night we sit here with our thumbs up our asses hoping that everyone not BB agrees. Also leaving game resolution purely to NAs sucks.

A Tulas vote may as well be a vote for night. Fanderay will still be able to resurrect a team member.