Gait, on 21 October 2016 - 08:37 AM, said:
Both vote elsewhere with questionable reasons
Although reading the back and forth between Mockra and Arrivenatha it doesn't much look like they were partners
Mockra, on 19 October 2016 - 10:56 PM, said:
Gait got 2 votes
Aranatha is voting Telas, b/c Telas is voting Aranatha
Telas appears to be voting based on gut again. Keeping in mind how that worked out last game, I'd rather not follow his gut.
Aranatha is all over the place, and his vote is OMGUS everyone I talking about him, so i'm pencillin him as "symp at worst" column, but IGMEOY
Now, Gait vote is based on a case. One that implicates me, as it happens. I obviously don't agree with suggestion that I'm symp, but Bendal ties too many people together in that post for us to simply ignore.
So I'll
vote Gait
And if he CFs inno, i'll be taking a long hard look at Liosan (again)
Bendal Home, on 20 October 2016 - 08:24 AM, said:
Mockra, on 19 October 2016 - 01:52 PM, said:
having re-read the whole of 3 pages we have, really not liking Lio atm. He's posted 3 quotes by Aranatha,presenting them as "consecutive", omitting at least as many in his back and forth with Kesso. If that's not strawmanning, I don't know what is.
Couple that with his "signal-fishing" yesterday against me (pet peeve: I hate the "well, X feels scummy, but I don't know why" posts. In my experience, people tend to make those accusations for a few days, and then start screaming bloody murder that X is scum because they're too "smooth under all that pressure".), and he's looking quite shady in my books.
Mockra, on 19 October 2016 - 08:19 PM, said:
Gait, on 19 October 2016 - 07:19 PM, said:
There's not much to Liosan for me. Mockra is there anything else aside from the signalling prod you don't like about them? Bendal, what did you not like about them and how did it change on reread?
Also I think you're leaning towards Telas being town too quickly. But it seems to be an error in my thinking too.
I already mentioned, his cherry-picking of Aranatha's quotes without context stinks of strawmanning.
Mockra, on 19 October 2016 - 08:36 PM, said:
Kessobahn, on 18 October 2016 - 11:53 PM, said:
And their very next post:
Kessobahn, on 19 October 2016 - 12:15 AM, said:
Vote Omtose
Mockra, on 19 October 2016 - 10:56 PM, said:
Gait got 2 votes
Aranatha is voting Telas, b/c Telas is voting Aranatha
Telas appears to be voting based on gut again. Keeping in mind how that worked out last game, I'd rather not follow his gut.
Aranatha is all over the place, and his vote is OMGUS everyone I talking about him, so i'm pencillin him as "symp at worst" column, but IGMEOY
Now, Gait vote is based on a case. One that implicates me, as it happens. I obviously don't agree with suggestion that I'm symp, but Bendal ties too many people together in that post for us to simply ignore.
So I'll
vote Gait
And if he CFs inno, i'll be taking a long hard look at Liosan (again)
Er, what the actual fuck.
All day pointing his finger at Liosan and then votes Gait even though the case involves him signalling Gait. This to show or "prove" that Gait is not his master? Fuck, I really wanted to move away from Gait but I do not think I can or should.
Vote Gait
Mockra says he doesn't want to follow Tela's gut but Tela's vote had little to do with gut and Mockra later calls it a vote based on his proven scum "tell", that seems to be contradicting
Edit: posted first quote twice
I am just up to that part now, I won't over quote you, seem as you found it first.

Help














